Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Medicinas Complementárias
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin J Sport Med ; 32(3): e251-e260, 2022 05 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33797477

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the effects of adding arch-support foot-orthoses (ASFO) to a multimodal therapeutic intervention on the perception of pain and improvement of recovery from medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) in recreational runners. DESIGN: A prospective randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Sport training and medical centers. PARTICIPANTS: Fifty female recreational runners with MTSS were randomized into 2 groups. INTERVENTIONS: Runners either received ASFO or sham flat noncontoured orthoses. Both groups received a multimodal therapeutic intervention, including ice massage, ankle muscle exercises, and extracorporeal shockwave therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain during bone pressure using a numerical Likert scale (0-10), MTSS severity using an MTSS scale, perceived treatment effect using the global rating of change scale, and quality of life using the short Form-36 questionnaire were determined at week 6, 12, and 18. RESULTS: Pain intensity and MTSS severity were lower, and the perceived treatment effect and physical function were better in the ASFO than in the sham flat noncontoured orthoses group at week 6 and week 12. Cohen's dz effect size for between-group differences showed a medium difference. However, arch-support foot-orthoses did not add to the benefits of multimodal therapeutic intervention on pain, MTSS severity and perceived treatment effect at week 18. CONCLUSIONS: Adding ASFO to a therapeutic intervention leads to an earlier diminishment of pain and MTSS severity, and improved PF and perceived therapeutic effects.


Asunto(s)
Ortesis del Pié , Síndrome de Estrés Medial de la Tibia , Femenino , Humanos , Hielo , Síndrome de Estrés Medial de la Tibia/terapia , Dolor , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida
2.
Sports Med ; 44(7): 943-56, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24723211

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Injection therapies are widely used for muscle injuries. As there is only limited evidence of their efficacy, physicians should be aware of the potential harmful effects of these injected preparations. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this review was to systematically review the literature on the myotoxic effects of intramuscular injection preparations commonly used for acute muscle injuries. DATA SOURCES: The databases of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and SportDiscus were searched in March 2013. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Studies reporting histological evaluation or creatine kinase activity after intramuscular injection with local anaesthetics, corticosteroids, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), Traumeel(®) and Actovegin(®), or combination preparations were eligible for inclusion. DATA ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened the search results and assessed the risk of bias. A best-evidence synthesis was used to identify the level of evidence. RESULTS: Forty-nine studies were included in this systematic review. There is strong to moderate evidence that intramuscularly injected local anaesthetics and NSAIDs are myotoxic, and there is conflicting evidence of the myotoxicity of PRP. There is limited evidence that single corticosteroid injections are not myotoxic but have a synergistic myotoxic effect when used together with local anaesthetics. There is no information to assess whether Actovegin(®) and Traumeel(®) are myotoxic. CONCLUSION: Local anaesthetics and NSAID injections are not recommended for the treatment of muscle injuries in athletes, as they are myotoxic. The possible myotoxic effects of corticosteroids, PRP, Traumeel(®) and Actovegin(®) should be assessed in future research.


Asunto(s)
Anestésicos Locales/efectos adversos , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/efectos adversos , Músculo Esquelético/efectos de los fármacos , Músculo Esquelético/lesiones , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Anestésicos Locales/administración & dosificación , Animales , Antiinflamatorios no Esteroideos/administración & dosificación , Creatina Quinasa/metabolismo , Hemo/administración & dosificación , Hemo/efectos adversos , Hemo/análogos & derivados , Homeopatía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Inyecciones Intramusculares , Minerales/administración & dosificación , Minerales/efectos adversos , Músculo Esquelético/enzimología , Extractos Vegetales/administración & dosificación , Extractos Vegetales/efectos adversos , Plasma Rico en Plaquetas
3.
Sports Med ; 43(12): 1315-33, 2013 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23979968

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Medial tibial stress syndrome (MTSS) is a common exercise-induced leg injury among athletes and military personnel. Several treatment options have been described in the literature, but it remains unclear which treatment is most effective. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to assess the effectiveness of any intervention in the treatment of MTSS. STUDY SELECTION: Published or non-published studies, reporting randomized or non-randomized controlled trials of any treatment in subjects with MTSS were eligible for inclusion. Treatments were assessed for effects on pain, time to recovery or global perceived effect. DATA SOURCES: Computerized bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, CENTRAL, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and SPORTDiscus) and trial registries were searched for relevant reports, from their inception to 1 June 2012. Grey literature was searched for additional relevant reports. STUDY APPRAISAL: The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used to appraise study quality of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) whereas the Newcastle Ottawa Scale was used to appraise non-randomized trials. The 'levels of evidence', according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, addressed the impact of the assessed trials. Two reviewers independently performed the search for articles, study selection, data extraction and appraised methodological quality. RESULTS: Eleven trials were included in this systematic review. All RCTs revealed a high risk of bias (Level 3 of evidence). Both non-randomized clinical trials were found to be of poor quality (Level 4 of evidence). RCTs, studying the effect of a lower leg brace versus no lower leg brace, and iontophoresis versus phonophoresis, were pooled using a fixed-effects model. No significant differences were found for lower leg braces (standardized mean difference [SMD] -0.06; 95 % CI -0.44 to 0.32, p = 0.76), or iontophoresis (SMD 0.09; 95 % CI -0.50 to 0.68, p = 0.76). Iontophoresis, phonophoresis, ice massage, ultrasound therapy, periosteal pecking and extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) could be effective in treating MTSS when compared with control (Level 3 to 4 of evidence). Low-energy laser treatment, stretching and strengthening exercises, sports compression stockings, lower leg braces and pulsed electromagnetic fields have not been proven to be effective in treating MTSS (level 3 of evidence). CONCLUSION: None of the studies are sufficiently free from methodological bias to recommend any of the treatments investigated. Of those examined, ESWT appears to have the most promise.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Síndrome de Estrés Medial de la Tibia/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Humanos , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA