X-Ray Exposure in Cardiac Electrophysiology: A Retrospective Analysis in 8150 Patients Over 7 Years of Activity in a Modern, Large-Volume Laboratory.

BACKGROUND: Only a few studies have systematically evaluated fluoroscopy data of electrophysiological and device implantation procedures. Aims of this study were to quantify ionizing radiation exposure for electrophysiological/device implantation procedures in a large series of patients and to analyze the x-ray exposure trend over years and radiation exposure in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation considering different technical aspects. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a retrospective analysis of all electrophysiological/device implantation procedures performed during the past 7 years in a modern, large-volume laboratory. We reported complete fluoroscopy data on 8150 electrophysiological/device implantation procedures (6095 electrophysiological and 2055 device implantation procedures); for each type of procedure, effective dose and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence and mortality were calculated. Over the 7-year period, we observed a significant trend reduction in fluoroscopy time, dose area product, and effective dose for all electrophysiological procedures (P<0.001) and a not statistically significant trend reduction for device implantation procedures. Analyzing 2416 atrial fibrillation ablations, we observed a significant variability of fluoroscopy time, dose area product and effective dose among 7 different experienced operators (P<0.0001) and a significant reduction of fluoroscopy use over time (P<0.0001) for all of them. Considering atrial fibrillation ablation techniques, fluoroscopy time was not different (P = 0.74) for radiofrequency catheter ablation in comparison with cryoablation, though cryoablation was still associated with higher dose area product and effective dose values (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological procedures involve a nonnegligible x-ray use, leading to an increased risk of malignancy. Awareness of radiation-related risk, together with technological advances, can successfully optimize fluoroscopy use.

[New generation implantable loop recorders can be safely managed by certified nurses]. / I loop recorder impiantabili di nuova generazione possono essere gestiti in maniera sicura ed efficace da personale infermieristico formato.

. New generation implantable loop recorders can be safely managed by certified nurses. INTRODUCTION: Implantable loop recorders (ILR) are recommended for several cardiac disorders: the recent miniaturization processes eased their implant and management. AIM: To describe the advantages of the ILR implant, patients' education and remote control performed by expert certified nurses. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of consecutive ILR implants of our centre, preformed between May and December 2016: the complications occurred in patients implanted by doctors and nurses were described. Nurses were certified after a two days course and 3 implants assisted by a medical doctor. RESULTS: 157 patients were implanted with a ICM Reveal LINQ (Medtronic): 74 (47%) by physicians electrophysiologists and 83 (53%) out of the electrophysiology room, by certified nurses. The two groups of patients were not fully comparable because more complex patients were implanted by the physician. All the loop recorders were easily implanted adverse without events during the procedure and after 30 days. Two minor bleedings occurred 24 hours after the implant: 1 in a patient implanted by a physician and the other by a nurse. Both were rapidly solved by finger pressure. CONCLUSIONS: The ILR implants can be safely performed by trained nurses, out of the elettrophysiology room, with benefits for the patients and the hospital.

Risk of arrhythmias in myotonic dystrophy: trial design of the RAMYD study.

OBJECTIVE: Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) is the most frequent muscular dystrophy in adults. DM1 is a multisystem disorder also affecting the heart with an increased incidence of sudden death, which has been explained with the common impairment of the conduction system often requiring pacemaker implantation; however, the occurrence of sudden death despite pacemaker implantation and the observation of major ventricular arrhythmias generated the hypothesis that ventricular arrhythmias may play a causal role as well. The aim of the study was to assess the 2-year cumulative incidence and the value of noninvasive and invasive findings as predictive factors for sudden death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, ventricular fibrillation, sustained ventricular tachycardia and severe sinus dysfunction or high-degree atrioventricular block. METHODS/DESIGN: More than 500 DM1 patients will be evaluated at baseline with a clinical interview, 12-lead ECG, 24-h ECG and echocardiogram. Conventional and nonconventional indications to electrophysiological study, pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or loop recorder implantation have been developed. In the case of an indication to electrophysiological study, pacemaker, implantable cardioverter defibrillator or loop recorder implant at baseline or at follow-up, the patient will be referred for the procedure. At the end of 2-year follow-up, all candidate prognostic factors will be tested for their association with the endpoints. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov ID NCT00127582. CONCLUSION: The available evidence supports the hypothesis that both bradyarrhythmias and tachyarrhythmias may cause sudden death in DM1, but the course of cardiac disease in DM1 is still unclear. We expect that this large, prospective, multicenter study will provide evidence to improve diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in DM1.