Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Anticancer Res ; 43(1): 137-141, 2023 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36585163

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND/AIM: A well-known complication of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Khorana score is used as a tool to help determine the role of primary prophylaxis (PPx) in cancer patients with VTE. This study compared outcomes in PDAC patients who received primary PPx (anticoagulation) versus those who did not. PATIENTS AND METHODS: PDAC patients from 2017-2019 at Allegheny General Hospital were retrospectively reviewed. Descriptive statistics were presented via medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables and percentages for categorical variables. Predictors of VTE development were determined using univariable and multivariable logistic regression models. T-tests and Chi-square tests were used to compare means and percentages, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 102 patients with full VTE PPx data were reviewed. At least one VTE event was identified in 29 patients (28.2%). A total of 4 out of these 29 patients (13.8%) were on PPx anticoagulation. Death secondary to VTE occurred in one patient without PPx. Two (2.0%) patients experienced bleeding events of those prescribed VTE PPx. On univariable analysis, stage IV disease, planned surgery, and unresectable disease were predictors of VTE development. On multivariate analysis, total pancreatectomy was a predictor of VTE development. There was no difference in average time to progression amongst patients who had developed VTE versus those who did not. CONCLUSION: The Khorana score for VTE PPx in PDAC patients in underutilized.


Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Tromboembolia Venosa , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/complicaciones , Adenocarcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Tromboembolia Venosa/etiología , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevención & control , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Factores de Riesgo , Anticoagulantes/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
2.
Cancer Treat Res Commun ; 27: 100347, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33711636

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for non-metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal (SCCA) is concurrent chemoradiotherapy. It is postulated that chemotherapy could be omitted for the earliest stages without worsening outcomes. METHODS: We queried the NCDB from 2004-2016 for patients with cT1N0M0 SCCA treated non-operatively with radiation, with and without chemotherapy, and at least two months of follow-up. Of the 2,959 patients meeting eligibility, 92% received chemotherapy (n = 2722) and 8% (n = 237) did not. Most patients were white (n = 2676), female (n = 2019), had private insurance (n = 1507) and were treated in a comprehensive cancer center (n = 1389). Average age was 58.5 years. RESULTS: Predictors of chemotherapy omission were age > 58 years (OR 0.66, 95% CI [0.49-0.90], P = 0.0087), higher comorbidity score (OR 0.62, 95% CI [0.38-0.99], P = 0.0442), African American race (OR 0.57, 95% CI [0.36-0.90], P = 0.0156) and treatment at the start of the study period (OR 1 for years 2004-2006). HR for single-agent chemotherapy was 0.70 (95% CI [0.50-0.96], P = 0.0288) and 0.48 for multi-agent (95% CI [0.38-0.62], P <0.0001). Overall survival was 86% in those that received chemotherapy vs 65% in those who did not (P <0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, patients with early-stage squamous cell cancer of the anus who are treated with combination chemoradiation continue to demonstrate better overall survival than those who undergo radiotherapy alone.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Ano/terapia , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Canal Anal/patología , Neoplasias del Ano/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Ano/mortalidad , Neoplasias del Ano/patología , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/prevención & control , Estadificación de Neoplasias
3.
Clin Ther ; 39(11): 2146-2157, 2017 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29173655

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are heterogeneous tumors that arise from the neuroendocrine cells of the digestive tract and other organs, such as the lung, ovary, and thyroid glands. They can be well differentiated or poorly differentiated, and management of these tumors differs for each histologic subtype. We have performed a review of NETs and focused on management of well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) and carcinoid syndrome. METHODS: A PubMed search was performed to obtain articles on the management of well-differentiated NETs. Using the key words neuroendocrine tumors, carcinoid, pNET, octreotide, somatostatin analogues, and radiolabeled therapy, we reviewed Phase II and III trials that were published over the past 30 years. We also reviewed guidelines from the European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, North America Neuroendocrine Tumor Society, and National Comprehensive Cancer Network in our search. FINDINGS: NETs are usually slow-growing tumors that remain asymptomatic for a long duration and can be either nonfunctioning or functioning. Surgical resection is recommended for locoregional disease, impending obstruction, symptom control, and advanced disease. Nonsurgical treatment options include somatostatin analogues (SSAs), multikinase inhibitors, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and radiolabeled SSAs. Carcinoid syndrome is mainly treated with SSAs. IMPLICATIONS: Although GEPNETs are slow-growing tumors, most patients are diagnosed with metastatic disease, and therefore it is important that the management of each patient be discussed in a multidisciplinary setting to optimize the treatment strategy. Patients should be considered for clinical trials and refractory cases referred to a specialty center.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Intestinales/terapia , Síndrome Carcinoide Maligno/terapia , Tumores Neuroendocrinos/terapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Humanos , Síndrome Carcinoide Maligno/tratamiento farmacológico , Octreótido/administración & dosificación , Somatostatina/administración & dosificación , Somatostatina/análogos & derivados
4.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 13(8): 1021-34, 2006 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16897272

RESUMEN

Colon cancer is the fourth most common cancer worldwide. The role of systemic adjuvant chemotherapy in colorectal cancer patients with lymph node involvement has been established in a large number of clinical trials. However, its role in stage II colorectal cancer is less well established. 5-Fluorouracil has been the mainstay of therapy for the last four decades. With the development of novel chemotherapy and biological agents, we have entered into a new era for the treatment of colorectal cancer. The combination of adjuvant 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin has been shown to significantly improve disease-free survival and is now considered the standard of care for completely resected colon cancer in healthy patients. For rectal cancer patients with locally advanced tumors, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by adjuvant chemotherapy after surgery is the mainstay of treatment. The availability of oral chemotherapy agents has helped with the ease of administration and avoidance of indwelling catheters. A number of national clinical trials are under way to determine the role of targeted agents in combination with chemotherapy. The goal is to develop a regimen that would improve survival without excessive toxicity while maintaining quality of life. Patients should be encouraged to participate in clinical trials whenever feasible. Despite the advances, many patients will develop recurrent disease. It is of utmost importance to develop molecular markers that could predict which patients are at high risk for disease recurrence. Clinical trials are under way to address this issue. Thus, it will be advantageous to be able to tailor therapy individually, according to the risk of recurrence.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Capecitabina , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Neoplasias Colorrectales/patología , Terapia Combinada , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Leucovorina/administración & dosificación , Metástasis Linfática , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Compuestos Organoplatinos/administración & dosificación , Oxaliplatino , Radioterapia Adyuvante
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA