Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Health Econ ; 8(2): 123-35, 2007 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17370096

RESUMEN

Our objective was to assess the 5-year cost effectiveness of bronchodilator therapy with tiotropium, salmeterol or ipratropium for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System (NHS). A probabilistic Markov model was designed wherein patients moved between moderate, severe or very severe COPD and had the risk of exacerbation and death. Probabilities were derived from clinical trials. Spanish healthcare utilisation, costs and utilities were estimated for each COPD and exacerbation state. Outcomes were exacerbations, exacerbation-free months, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and cost(-effectiveness). The mean (SE) 5-year number of exacerbations was 3.50 (0.14) for tiotropium, 4.16 (0.40) for salmeterol and 4.71 (0.54) for ipratropium. The mean (SE) number of QALYs was 3.15 (0.08), 3.02 (0.15) and 3.00 (0.20), respectively. Mean (SE) 5-year costs were 6,424 euro (305 euro) for tiotropium, 5,869 euro (505 euro) for salmeterol, and 5,181 euro (682 euro) for ipratropium (2005 values). Ipratropium and tiotropium formed the cost-effectiveness frontier, with tiotropium being preferred when willingness to pay (WTP) exceeded 639 euro per exacerbation-free month and 8,157 euro per QALY. In Spain, tiotropium demonstrated the highest expected net benefit for ratios of the willingness to pay per QALY, well within accepted limits.


Asunto(s)
Albuterol/análogos & derivados , Broncodilatadores/economía , Ipratropio/economía , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Derivados de Escopolamina/economía , Albuterol/economía , Albuterol/uso terapéutico , Broncodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Ipratropio/uso terapéutico , Cadenas de Markov , Programas Nacionales de Salud , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Xinafoato de Salmeterol , Derivados de Escopolamina/uso terapéutico , España , Bromuro de Tiotropio
2.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 21(10): 709-19, 2003.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12828493

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost effectiveness of the addition of folinic acid to fluorouracil plus levamisole in patients with colon cancer from the perspective of the German Social Health Insurance. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Patients with International Union Against Cancer (Union International Contre Cancer; UICC) II/T(4) or UICC III colon cancer enrolled in an open-label randomised clinical trial in Germany (Forschungsgruppe Onkologie Gastrointestinaler Tumoren-1 [FOGT-1]) received either fluorouracil plus levamisole (A, standard) or fluorouracil plus levamisole and folinic acid (B) for 12 months as adjuvant chemotherapy after curative intended surgery. Outcome measures for economic evaluation were disease-free life-years gained (df-LYG) and overall life-years gained (LYG) derived from the respective Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Direct medical costs from the perspective of the German Social Health Insurance were estimated retrospectively (2000 values) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated. A Markov model was used to project the trial results beyond 5 years for the patients' remaining life expectancy. RESULTS: Adding folinic acid to the fluorouracil/levamisole regimen results in an increase in time to progression and survival in patients with locally advanced colon cancer. Within the trial period of 5 years ICERs (B versus A) were 33,008 Euro per df-LYG and 51,225 Euro per LYG (costs and effects discounted at 5%). The Markov model yielded ICERs of 11,176 Euro per df-LYG and 11,020 Euro per LYG (costs and effects discounted at 5%). The model was robust for variations of key variables in the sensitivity analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this cost-effectiveness analysis suggest that the addition of folinic acid offers clinical benefits at additional costs which are likely to be acceptable for decision makers in the long term. Cost-effectiveness ratios calculated within the clinical trial period were just above 50,000 Euro/LYG. Because treatment benefits, i.e. prolonged survival, are sustained beyond 5 years whereas incremental costs are mainly incurred in the first year, results of the Markov model yielded cost-effectiveness ratios that compare more favourably with other published ICERs.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Neoplasias del Colon/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias del Colon/economía , Programas Nacionales de Salud/economía , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/economía , Neoplasias del Colon/cirugía , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/economía , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Ácido Fólico/administración & dosificación , Ácido Fólico/economía , Ácido Fólico/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Humanos , Levamisol/administración & dosificación , Levamisol/economía , Levamisol/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA