Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Water Sci Technol ; 70(1): 136-43, 2014.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25026591

RESUMEN

The uranium(VI) adsorption efficiency of non-living biomass of brown algae was evaluated in various adsorption experimental conditions. Several different sizes of biomass were prepared using pretreatment and surface-modification steps. The kinetics of uranium uptake were mainly dependent on the particle size of the prepared Laminaria japonica biosorbent. The optimal particle size, contact time, and injection amount for the stable operation of the wastewater treatment process were determined. Spectroscopic analyses showed that uranium was adsorbed in the porous inside structure of the biosorbent. The ionic diffusivity in the biomass was the dominant rate-limiting factor; therefore, the adsorption rate was significantly increased with decrease of particle size. From the results of comparative experiments using the biosorbents and other chemical adsorbents/precipitants, such as activated carbons, zeolites, and limes, it was demonstrated that the brown algae biosorbent could replace the conventional chemicals for uranium removal. As a post-treatment for the final solid waste reduction, the ignition treatment could significantly reduce the weight of waste biosorbents. In conclusion, the brown algae biosorbent is shown to be a favorable adsorbent for uranium(VI) removal from radioactive wastewater.


Asunto(s)
Biomasa , Laminaria/metabolismo , Uranio/aislamiento & purificación , Contaminantes Radiactivos del Agua/aislamiento & purificación , Adsorción , Biodegradación Ambiental , Carbono/química , Difusión , Iones , Cinética , Microscopía Electrónica de Rastreo , Tamaño de la Partícula , Residuos Radiactivos , Eliminación de Residuos/métodos , Soluciones , Propiedades de Superficie , Temperatura , Factores de Tiempo , Purificación del Agua/métodos
2.
Arch Environ Contam Toxicol ; 50(3): 437-42, 2006 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16502205

RESUMEN

The potential dermal and respiratory exposure assessment and risk assessment for applicator were performed with cypermethrin EC. The pesticide was applied on a mandarin field using a power sprayer. Gloves were used for the hand exposure assessment, mask for face, and dermal patches for the other parts of the body. Personal air monitor equipped with a XAD-2 resin was used for the respiratory exposure assessment. During the application of cypermethrin in the field, the rate of potential dermal exposure ranged from 28.1 to 58.8 mg/h. The major exposure parts were upper-arms (22.1-24.6%) and legs (thigh and shin, 28.3-29.2%) for females and thigh (21.0-46.9%) and hand (14.9-19.3%) for males. Females were exposed more than males. No exposure was detected from the respiratory monitoring. For risk assessment, the potential dermal exposure (PDE), the absorbable quantity of exposure (AQE), and the margin of safety (MOS) were calculated. Among those four risk assessments, MOS was < 1 in only trial I, which indicated any possibility of risk. However, in the others, the possibility of risk was little. Moreover, the safe work time ranged from 3.61 h to 9.69 h.


Asunto(s)
Contaminantes Ocupacionales del Aire/análisis , Exposición por Inhalación/análisis , Insecticidas/análisis , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Piretrinas/análisis , Citrus , Femenino , Humanos , Corea (Geográfico) , Masculino , Medición de Riesgo , Piel/efectos de los fármacos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA