Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
1.
Int J Drug Policy ; 72: 160-168, 2019 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31085063

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Untreated opioid use disorder (OUD) affects the care of HIV/HCV co-infected people who inject opioids. Despite active injection opioid use, there is evidence of increasing engagement in HIV care and adherence to HIV medications among HIV/HCV co-infected persons. However, less than one-half of this population is offered HCV treatment onsite. Treatment for OUD is also rare and largely occurs offsite. Integrating buprenorphine-naloxone (BUP-NX) into onsite care for HIV/HCV co-infected persons may improve outcomes, but the clinical impact and costs are unknown. We evaluated the clinical impact, costs, and cost-effectiveness of integrating (BUP-NX) into onsite HIV/HCV treatment compared with the status quo of offsite referral for medications for OUD. METHODS: We used a Monte Carlo microsimulation of HCV to compare two strategies for people who inject opioids: 1) standard HIV care with onsite HCV treatment and referral to offsite OUD care (status quo) and 2) standard HIV care with onsite HCV and BUP-NX treatment (integrated care). Both strategies assume that all individuals are already in HIV care. Data from national databases, clinical trials, and cohorts informed model inputs. Outcomes included mortality, HCV reinfection, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), costs (2017 US dollars), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Integrated care reduced HCV reinfections by 7%, cases of cirrhosis by 1%, and liver-related deaths by 3%. Compared to the status quo, this strategy also resulted in an estimated 11/1,000 fewer non-liver attributable deaths at one year and 28/1,000 fewer of these deaths at five years, at a cost-effectiveness ratio of $57,100/QALY. Integrated care remained cost-effective in sensitivity analyses that varied the proportion of the population actively injecting opioids, availability of BUP-NX, and quality of life weights. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating BUP-NX for OUD into treatment for HIV/HCV co-infected adults who inject opioids increases life expectancy and is cost-effective at a $100,000/QALY threshold.


Asunto(s)
Combinación Buprenorfina y Naloxona/administración & dosificación , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/organización & administración , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Combinación Buprenorfina y Naloxona/economía , Coinfección , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/economía , Femenino , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por VIH/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/epidemiología , Hepatitis C/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Método de Montecarlo , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/economía , Calidad de Vida , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Abuso de Sustancias por Vía Intravenosa/economía
2.
Drug Alcohol Depend ; 185: 411-420, 2018 04 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29477574

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: We evaluated the cost-effectiveness of a hepatitis C (HCV) screening and active linkage to care intervention in US methadone maintenance treatment (MMT) patients using data from a randomized trial conducted in New York City and San Francisco. METHODS: We used a decision analytic model to compare 1) no intervention; 2) HCV screening and education (control); and 3) HCV screening, education, and care coordination (active linkage intervention). We also explored an alternative strategy wherein HCV/HIV co-infected participants linked elsewhere. Trial data include population characteristics (67% male, mean age 48, 58% HCV infected) and linkage rates. Data from published sources include treatment efficacy and HCV re-infection risk. We projected quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and lifetime medical costs using an established model of HCV (HEP-CE). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) are in 2015 US$/QALY discounted 3% annually. RESULTS: The control strategy resulted in a projected 35% linking to care within 6 months and 31% achieving sustained virologic response (SVR). The intervention resulted in 60% linking and 54% achieving SVR with an ICER of $24,600/QALY compared to no intervention from the healthcare sector perspective and was a more efficient use of resources than the control strategy. The intervention had an ICER of $76,500/QALY compared to the alternative strategy. From a societal perspective, the intervention had a net monetary benefit of $511,000-$975,600. CONCLUSIONS: HCV care coordination interventions that include screening, education and active linkage to care in MMT settings are likely cost-effective at a conventional $100,000/QALY threshold for both HCV mono-infected and HIV co-infected patients.


Asunto(s)
Análisis Costo-Beneficio/métodos , Hepatitis C Crónica/diagnóstico , Hepatitis C Crónica/economía , Tamizaje Masivo/economía , Metadona/economía , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/economía , Adulto , Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Coinfección , Femenino , Hepatitis C Crónica/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ciudad de Nueva York/epidemiología , Tratamiento de Sustitución de Opiáceos/métodos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , San Francisco/epidemiología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA