RESUMEN
Background: Trastuzumab deruxtecan is classified as an anticancer agent that poses a moderate emetic risk in the international guidelines for antiemetic therapy. The guidelines recommend emesis prophylaxis using a two-drug combination therapy comprising a 5-hydroxytryptamine-3 receptor antagonist (5-HT3RA) and dexamethasone (DEX). However, the high incidence of nausea and vomiting associated with trastuzumab deruxtecan is problematic. The National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline version 1.2023 classified trastuzumab deruxtecan as having a high risk of emesis and changed its recommendation to a triplet regimen including a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist (NK1RA). However, the emetogenic potential of trastuzumab-deruxtecan and the optimal antiemetic prophylaxis are controversial. Hence, this exploratory phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of treatment comprising 5-HT3RA and DEX with or without a NK1RA in preventing trastuzumab deruxtecan-induced nausea and vomiting. Methods: We conducted an open-label and randomized exploratory phase 2 study at 14 centers in Japan. Patients with breast cancer who were scheduled to receive trastuzumab deruxtecan were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to receive granisetron and DEX (arm GD) or granisetron, DEX, and aprepitant (fosaprepitant; arm GDA). The primary endpoint was complete response (CR; no emesis or no rescue therapy) during the overall phase (120 h after the start of trastuzumab deruxtecan). Results: Between September 2020 and March 2023, 40 patients were randomly assigned to the GD (n = 19) or GDA (n = 21) arm. In the GDA arm, one patient who did not complete the use of the rescue medication listed in the diary was excluded from the efficacy analysis, which included the use of rescue medication. The CR rates during the overall phase were 36.8% and 70.0% in the GD and GDA arms, respectively (odds ratio 0.1334; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0232-0.7672; P = 0.0190), with a difference of 33.2%. No grade 3 or 4 toxicity related to antiemetic therapy was observed. Conclusions: Patients receiving trastuzumab deruxtecan require triple therapy, including mandatory NK1RA administration.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with borderline resectable pancreatic head cancer (BRPHC) have been treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy (NACRT) using metallic stents. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of covered self-expanding metallic stents (CSEMS) during the NACRT and surgical period. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We reviewed the outcomes of patients with BRPHC, then divided them chronologically into three groups as follows. Group A: upfront surgery with plastic stent (PS) deployment; group B: PS deployment plus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and/or NACRT; group C: CSEMS deployment plus NAC/NACRT. Patients were categorized as borderline resectable based on National Comprehensive Cancer Network Guidelines, 2010. Days to reintervention (DR), reintervention rate, and the rate of R0 and complications were studied. Safe margin-negative resection (R0) surgery was defined as R0 surgery without reintervention during the NACRT period and no postoperative complications. RESULTS: DR were as follows. Groups A, B and C were 32, 55 and 97 days, respectively (P < 0.05). R0 surgery obtained in groups A, B and C was 53% (9/17), 100% (17/17) and 93% (14/15), respectively. CSEMS did not interfere with surgery. Safe R0 surgery obtained in groups B and C was 11% (2/19) and 67% (10/15), respectively (P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that the odds ratio for safe R0 surgery was 16.210 (95% CI 2.457-106.962, P = 0.003) for CSEMS placement. CONCLUSION: CSEMS should be considered to relieve symptomatic biliary obstruction in patients with BRPHC receiving NACRT in view of the high attainability rate of safe R0 surgery compared to that with PS deployment.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/terapia , Stents , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Arteria Mesentérica Superior/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Cuidados Preoperatorios/instrumentación , Diseño de Prótesis , Esfinterotomía Endoscópica , GemcitabinaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIM: Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein invasion or intrahepatic metastases has an unfavorable prognosis, even after curative hepatic resection. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of adjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and systemic interferon (IFN). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed as having HCC with portal vein invasion or intrahepatic metastases were included in the study (n=33). Out of these patients, 16 were treated with adjuvant therapy consisting of continuous arterial infusion of 5-FU and subcutaneous injection of IFN-α. Another 17 patients who underwent hepatic resection without adjuvant chemotherapy served as controls. RESULTS: The five-year cumulative survival rate was significantly higher in the adjuvant treatment group (71.1%) than in the control group (44.0%; p=0.023). The rate of patients with multiple (≥4) recurrent intrahepatic nodules was significantly lower in the adjuvant group (44.4%) than in the control group (100%; p=0.040). The development of intrahepatic recurrence within 12 months was significantly lower in the adjuvant group (33.3%) than in the control group (80.0%; p=0.040). CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that this adjuvant chemotherapy can improve postoperative prognosis by reducing intrahepatic recurrence.
Asunto(s)
Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Arteria Hepática , Interferones/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Anciano , Antimetabolitos Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Infusiones Intraarteriales , Interferones/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
A58-year-old man with upper abdominal pain had a duodenal perforation and a huge hepatocellular carcinoma (BCC). Atumor embolism in the main portal vein was also seen. Extended right lobectomy against a huge tumor in right lobe and ethanol injection to a tumor in the lateral segment were performed. In addition, fluorouracil arterial infusion and interferon therapy(FAIT)were carried out. He has been for 4 years and 6 months without recurrence. Although prognosis of patients with a huge BCC is miserable even if curative hepatic resection is performed, it may be possible for adjuvant FAIT to suppress the recurrence after hepatic resection for huge BCC.