Conjunctival provocation test in diagnosis of peanut allergy in children.

BACKGROUND: Peanut allergy frequently causes severe allergic reactions. Diagnosis includes detection of IgE to peanuts in serum or by skin prick tests. While children may have allergic sensitization without having clinical peanut allergy, oral peanut challenge is often required for accurate diagnosis. The conjunctival provocation test is used for diagnosis and evaluation of treatment effect in inhalant allergies, but it has not been evaluated as a tool for diagnosing peanut allergy. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether the conjunctival provocation tests may be feasible, accurate and safe in diagnosing clinically relevant peanut allergy in patients with suspected peanut allergy. METHODS: This cross-sectional case-control study in children with clinical or laboratory suspected peanut allergy included 102 children recruited from the regional paediatric departments and specialist practices during one year from April 2011. A peanut-tolerant control group of 28 children of similar age was recruited locally. A double-blind placebo-controlled conjunctival provocation test with peanut extract was performed in all children, while oral peanut provocation was performed as double-blind placebo-controlled challenge in children with suspected peanut allergy and as an open challenge in the control children. RESULTS: All 81 children with a positive double-blind placebo-controlled oral food challenge (OFC) also had a positive conjunctival provocation test. None of the children with negative conjunctival provocation test had a positive OFC. The sensitivity and the specificity of the conjunctival provocation test were 0.96 and 0.83, respectively. No children had severe adverse reaction caused by the conjunctival provocation test, whereas 23 children suffered an anaphylactic reaction to the OFC. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Conjunctival allergen challenge appears to be feasible, accurate and safe in diagnosing children referred for suspected peanut allergy.

Use of rifampicin and ciprofloxacin combination therapy after surgical debridement in the treatment of early manifestation prosthetic joint infections.

Prosthetic joint infections are difficult to eradicate, and antibiotic and surgical treatment strategies lack standardisation. The present study followed 29 patients (median age 72 years, median American Society of Anesthesia score of two) with early prosthetic joint infections. Treatment consisted of device retention, surgical debridement and therapy with rifampicin and ciprofloxacin for 3 months. This treatment regimen failed in five patients during the study, with a median observation period of 674 days. The results of this study confirm the findings of the only previous study on device retention with antibiotic treatment.

Homeopathic treatment of migraine: a double blind, placebo controlled trial of 68 patients [see comment].

To evaluate the efficacy of homeopathy in preventing migraine attacks and accompanying symptoms, a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial was conducted. There was a one-month registration period without treatment, followed by four months individualised homeopathic treatment or identical placebo. Patients were stratified for common or classical migraine. Seventy-three patients were randomised, 68 completed the trial. Baseline values were similar in the two groups. Both the homeopathy and placebo groups had reduction in attack frequency, pain intensity and drug consumption, with a statistically non-significant difference favouring homeopathy. Migraine diaries showed no difference between groups. The neurologists' trial evaluation showed a statistically significant reduction in attack frequency in the homeopathy group (P= 0.04) and non-statistically significant trends in favour of homeopathy for pain intensity and overall evaluation. Further research, with improved trial design, on the possible role of homeopathy in migraine prophylaxis is justified.

The effect of daily low-dose iron supplements in female blood donors with depleted iron stores: comparison with female non-donors.

Female blood donors with serum ferritin < or = 20 micrograms l-1 and haemoglobin > 120 g l-1 participated in an iron supplement study with two different low-dose supplements in a period without donations. Comparable non-donors served as controls. Serum ferritin, haemoglobin and transferrin were determined. Increases in serum ferritin and in haemoglobin, and decrease in transferrin were highly significant (p < 0.01) in both donor groups. In one of the non-donor groups the increase in serum ferritin and decrease in transferrin were highly significant (p < 0.01), while in the other only transferrin changed significantly (p < 0.03). The increases in serum ferritin and haemoglobin over a 5-month period were significantly higher among donors (p < 0.001) than among non-donors. We interpret the results to mean that the donors have a more efficient iron absorption.