Endovascular therapy for vasospasm after aneurysmatic subarachnoid hemorrhage.

INTRODUCTION: Balloon angioplasty and/or selective intra-arterial vasodilator therapies are treatment options in patients with vasospasm after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). We analyzed the effect of balloon angioplasty and/or selective intra-arterial vasodilator therapy in our patients. METHODS: Twenty-six patients (vasodilation group, VDT) were treated with intra-arterial nimodipine. The balloon angioplasty with nimodiopine-group (BAP-N group) comprised 21 patients. The primary endpoint of this study was successful angiographic vessel dilation in vasospastic vessels after balloon angioplasty, together with nimodipine (BAP-N group), compared to intra-arterial vasodilator therapy (VDT group) with nimodipine alone. RESULTS: A significant effect of angioplasty plus nimodipine was found in the central arteries (composite endpoint) with an OR of 2.4 (95% CI: 1.4-4.2], p = 0.002), indicating a chance of improvement of the BAP-N group of more than twice compared to nimodipine infusions alone. Significant advantages for BAP-N-therapy were also encountered in the internal carotid artery (OR 5.4, p < 0.001) and basilar artery (OR 29.7, p = 0.003). A joint analysis of all arteries combined failed to show significant benefit of BAP-N therapy (OR 1.5, p = 0.079), which was also true for cerebral peripheral arteries (OR 0.77, p = 0.367). There was no difference in clinical outcome between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In SAH patients with vasospasm, a combination therapy of balloon angioplasty and intra-arterial nimodipine resulted in a more than doubled vasodilative effect in the central cerebral arteries compared to the sole infusion of nimodipine. Regarding the ICA and BA arteries, this beneficial effect was even more pronounced. Although there was a tendency of better effects of the BAP-N group, regarding the overall effect in all territories combined, this failed to reach statistical evidence. In cerebral peripheral arteries, no differences were observed, and there was no difference in clinical outcome, too.

Transventricular fenestration of the lamina terminalis: the value of a flexible endoscope: technical note.

BACKGROUND: Recently, the authors demonstrated the technical feasibility of a transventricular translaminar terminalis ventriculostomy with a rigid endoscope. A major problem with this technique remains the contusion of the fornix at the foramen of Monro. Here, the authors evaluated alternative approaches and techniques, including the use of a flexible endoscope. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Feasibility of two approaches-anterior and posterior of the coronal suture-was evaluated on magnetic resonance images and in cadaveric brains. Two different trajectories were selected. Lamina terminalis (LT) fenestration was performed with a rigid and a flexible endoscope using two approaches in 10 fixed cadaver brains. RESULTS: Using the posterior approach 2 cm behind the coronal suture with the two endoscopes caused moderate to severe damage to foramen and fornix. Using the standard approach (Kocher point) with the flexible endoscope avoided damage of these structures. After completion of the anatomical investigation, the authors successfully performed a transventricular fenestration of the LT with the flexible endoscope in one clinical case. CONCLUSION: Rigid scopes provide brilliant optics and safe manipulation with the instruments. However, with the rigid scope, a transventricular opening of the LT is only possible with acceptance of structural damage to the foramen of Monro and the fornix. In contrast, opening of the LT via a transventricular route with preservation of the anatomical structures can be achieved with a flexible steerable endoscope even via a standard burr hole. Thus, if a standard third ventriculostomy is not feasible, endoscopic opening of the LT might represent an alternative, particularly with a flexible scope in experienced hands.