Two phase I dose-escalation/pharmacokinetics studies of low temperature liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD) and mild local hyperthermia in heavily pretreated patients with local regionally recurrent breast cancer.

PURPOSE: Unresectable chest wall recurrences of breast cancer (CWR) in heavily pretreated patients are especially difficult to treat. We hypothesised that thermally enhanced drug delivery using low temperature liposomal doxorubicin (LTLD), given with mild local hyperthermia (MLHT), will be safe and effective in this population. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This paper combines the results of two similarly designed phase I trials. Eligible CWR patients had progressed on the chest wall after prior hormone therapy, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Patients were to get six cycles of LTLD every 21-35 days, followed immediately by chest wall MLHT for 1 hour at 40-42 °C. In the first trial 18 subjects received LTLD at 20, 30, or 40 mg/m2; in the second trial, 11 subjects received LTLD at 40 or 50 mg/m2. RESULTS: The median age of all 29 patients enrolled was 57 years. Thirteen patients (45%) had distant metastases on enrolment. Patients had received a median dose of 256 mg/m2 of prior anthracyclines and a median dose of 61 Gy of prior radiation. The median number of study treatments that subjects completed was four. The maximum tolerated dose was 50 mg/m2, with seven subjects (24%) developing reversible grade 3-4 neutropenia and four (14%) reversible grade 3-4 leucopenia. The rate of overall local response was 48% (14/29, 95% CI: 30-66%), with. five patients (17%) achieving complete local responses and nine patients (31%) having partial local responses. CONCLUSION: LTLD at 50 mg/m2 and MLHT is safe. This combined therapy produces objective responses in heavily pretreated CWR patients. Future work should test thermally enhanced LTLD delivery in a less advanced patient population.

A pharmacokinetic evaluation of topotecan as a cervical cancer therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Topotecan was initially approved for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. In cervical cancer, it has been investigated for its potential as part of systemic therapy for advanced and/or recurrent disease and in combination with cisplatin and radiation as a first-line treatment for advanced disease. As a topoisomerase I (topo I) inhibitor, its activity is predicted to be schedule-dependent and potentiated in a schedule-dependent manner by its interaction with DNA damaging agents. AREAS COVERED: The cytotoxicity of topotecan is believed to be due to double-stranded DNA damage produced when the DNA replication 'fork' on the opposing DNA strand is interrupted by the ternary complex formed by topotecan, topoisomerase I and DNA. This review focuses on: i) combination studies of cisplatin + topotecan both as neoadjuvant and with concomitant radiation; ii) adding this drug as a radiosensitizer in pilot studies for locally advanced disease and iii) topotecan as part of non-cisplatin combinations in metastatic disease. EXPERT OPINION: Cervical cancer continues to claim many victims among parts of the world where early detection and/or vaccination programs are not systemically applied. Topotecan is an attractive building block for improving therapy against advanced disease.

Cisplatin with capecitabine: tolerance and activity in a phase I/II study preferentially enrolling patients with gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Capecitabine is an oral prodrug of flurouracil with broad activity against various malignancies. We explored its tolerance and preliminary efficacy when given together with cisplatin in a phase I/II study preferentially enrolling gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study was a 3+3 dose escalation design and at the recommended phase II dose it included an expanded cohort of patients with upper gastrointestinal cancer. The dose of cisplatin was escalated from 40 to 50 mg/m(2) on day 1, and capecitabine of 2,500 mg/m(2)/day starting on day 2, was escalated from 5 days to 10 and then to 14 days, with the cycle repeated every 21 days. Prolonged maintenance with capecitabine was offered to selected patients completing three to six cycles. RESULTS: A total of 34 patients were enrolled, and 27 patients were also evaluable for response. Dose limiting toxicities were palmar plantar erythrodyesthesia (PPE) and diarrhea; grade 3 and 4 neutropenia occurred in 8.8% and grade 3 PPE in 5.9%, while the most common grade 1-2 toxicities were anemia, neutropenia, fatigue and PPE (11.7% each). There were no treatment related deaths. With cisplatin at 40-50 mg/m(2) day 1 and capecitabine at 2,500 mg/m(2)/day for 5 -14 days every 21 days, 18 patients with gastric cancer were treated and 7 had partial responses. CONCLUSION: A regimen of capecitabine and cisplatin at the doses and schedules explored was safe and active in patients with gastric cancer. Moreover, a 6-month administration of adjuvant capecitabine proved feasible, yielding favorable results after treatment completion and surgery, and should be investigated further.

Postoperative intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine added to chemoradiation in patients curatively resected (R0) for locally advanced gastric and gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

PURPOSE: Chemoradiation after surgery for locally advanced gastric cancer improves overall and relapse-free survival compared with observation. However, locoregional recurrences remain high. Accordingly, we instituted this pilot/feasibility study, including intraperitoneal 5-fluoro-2'-deoxyuridine (IP FUDR) as part of the treatment. METHODS: Gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma stage Ib-IV (M0) patients who underwent R(0) resection were eligible and had IP catheters inserted at time of surgery. IP FUDR (3 g/dose/day) was given during study days 1-3 and 15-17 before combined 5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, and external beam radiation (45 Gy). Endpoints included toxicity, completion rate, locoregional recurrence, and survival. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (22 men) were enrolled from 2002-2006 at two institutions; their median age was 59.5 years. After R(0) resection, a median 22 (range, 8-102) lymph nodes were examined, and 22 patients had positive nodes. AJCC stages were IB (n = 8), II (n = 10), IIIA (n = 5), IIIB (n = 1), and IV (n = 4). Full-dose IP FUDR and chemoradiation treatment was completed in 20 and 25 patients, respectively. At nearly 4-year median follow-up, 11 patients were disease-free, 5 were alive with disease, 7 were dead of disease, and 1 was dead from other cause; 4 have been lost to follow-up. Recurrences were local in one, intra-abdominal in six, distant in two, multiple sites in two, and unknown in one. The median relapse-free survival is 65.3 months, and the median overall survival has not yet been reached. CONCLUSIONS: IP FUDR before chemoradiation after R(0) gastric cancer resection is well tolerated without compromising completion of postoperative adjuvant treatment. Larger randomized trials studying IP FUDR as part of gastric cancer multidisciplinary treatment are needed to prove efficacy in reducing regional recurrence and improving survival.

Relevance of chemotherapy dose and schedule to outcomes in ovarian cancer.

The current standard of care in ovarian cancer is complete surgical cytoreduction followed by adjuvant (postoperative) platinum-based chemotherapy. Taxanes are frequently combined with platinum compounds in the adjuvant chemotherapy setting and, whether they are given in combination or sequentially, they produce greater progression-free and overall survival than historical combination regimens. Because the treatment of ovarian cancer relies on chemotherapy, this article reviews the evidence for a correlation between chemotherapy delivered at full dose on schedule (FDOS) and patient outcomes. Meta-analyses have suggested that the dose intensities of cisplatin and carboplatin correlate with survival. However, the findings in these hypothesis-generating analyses have not been confirmed in prospective trials. In addition, increasing the dose of cisplatin above a certain threshold is not recommended in ovarian cancer because of the greater toxicity with higher doses of platinum compounds. The delivered dose intensities of taxanes used as single agents have not been shown to correlate with patient outcomes, but adding a taxane to platinum compounds appears both to attenuate the toxicity of the platinum compounds and to facilitate the delivery of FDOS chemotherapy. In the literature on ovarian cancer there is no clear consensus on the benefit of maintaining FDOS chemotherapy. Clinical studies, especially a proposed trial of a dose-dense carboplatin and paclitaxel combination, may provide stronger evidence for the effect of FDOS chemotherapy in ovarian cancer.

Oxaliplatin with weekly bolus fluorouracil and low-dose leucovorin as first-line therapy for patients with colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To determine the activity of biweekly oxaliplatin, combined with weekly bolus fluorouracil (FU) and low-dose leucovorin (LV) chemotherapy (bFOL), as first-line therapy for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable metastatic colorectal cancer; no previous therapy for advanced disease (adjuvant therapy allowed if >6 months since completion); and performance status 0, 1, or 2 were eligible and were treated with oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 days 1 and 15 plus LV 20 mg/m2 over 10 to 20 minutes, followed by a 500 mg/m2 bolus dose of FU on days 1, 8, and 15 every 28 days. Patients underwent response evaluation by computed tomographic scan every 2 months. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were entered, and 41 patients were treated, including 20 men and 22 women, nine with previous adjuvant chemotherapy and four with radiation therapy. Three patients achieved complete response, and 23 patients achieved partial response, for a response rate of 63% (95% CI, 49% to 78%). Major toxicities included cumulative neuropathy grade 2 (24%) and grade 3 (12%; requiring discontinuation of oxaliplatin), diarrhea grade 3 to 4 (29%) and grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (10%). Median time to progression was 9.0 months (95% confidence interval, 7.1 to 10.8 months) with median survival of 15.9 months (95% confidence interval, 11.4 to 19.7 months). CONCLUSION: The bFOL regimen seems to have activity comparable to be infusional programs of FU combined with oxaliplatin. Prospective trials are warranted to determine the relative merits of this schedule compared with the currently indicated schedules.