Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 12 de 12
Filtrar
Más filtros

País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet ; 45(5): 587-599, 2020 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32440843

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Osteoarticular infections (OIs) caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) strains, have poor outcomes. We evaluated the outcomes of an optimized strategy of continuous beta-lactam infusion (BL-CI) guided by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa. METHODS: A prospective observational study of patients with P. aeruginosa OIs in a hospital-based BL-CI program (2016-2018) was carried out. TDM targeting free BL concentrations in plasma (fCss) of at least 3-4 × MIC was performed. We compared failure rates between patients with OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant strains who were treated with BL-CI, with or without colistin, and patients with OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible strains who were treated with ciprofloxacin. RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were included in the study, 19 (36.5%) of whom had OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa (13 (68.4%) MDR/XDR strains; 11 (57.9%) device-related infections). The median duration of BL-CI was 36 days; ten patients (52.6%) received BL-colistin combinations. Eighty-two samples were utilized in the TDM, and most patients were found to have a median fCss of 3-10 × MIC; 17 dose adjustments were performed and eight patients needed dose decreases, five of which were due to chronic kidney disease or acute kidney injury (AKI). BL-CI was well tolerated, with the most frequent adverse event being AKI. Failure occurred to 4 patients (21.1%), which was similar to the failure rate of patients with OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible P. aeruginosa treated with ciprofloxacin (5/30 [16.7%]) (p = 0.699). TDM was also used in the initial BL treatment of patients with OIs caused by susceptible strains before those patients were switched to treatment with ciprofloxacin alone (33 patients, 110 samples, 19 dose adjustments). CONCLUSIONS: BL-CI used with/without colistin and supported by TDM may be an alternative and effective treatment option for OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-resistant P. aeruginosa, where limited available therapeutic options exist, especially in the setting of multidrug resistance. Future research should elucidate whether this strategy can produce outcomes similar to those of patients treated for OIs caused by fluoroquinolone-susceptible strains.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Artropatías/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/microbiología , Ciprofloxacina/administración & dosificación , Estudios de Cohortes , Colistina/administración & dosificación , Monitoreo de Drogas , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Femenino , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Artropatías/microbiología , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Pseudomonas/microbiología , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , beta-Lactamas/farmacocinética
2.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(2): 240-250, 2020 01 28.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31469649

RESUMEN

Background Despite that measurement uncertainty data should facilitate an appropriate interpretation of measured values, there are actually few reported by clinical laboratories. We aimed to estimate the measurement uncertainty of some ß-lactam antibiotics (ß-LA), and to evaluate the impact of reporting the measurement uncertainty on clinicians' decisions while guiding antibiotic therapy. Methods Measurement uncertainty of ß-LA (aztreonam [ATM], cefepime [FEP], ceftazidime [CAZ], and piperacillin [PIP]) values, obtained by an UHPLC-MS/MS based-method, was estimated using the top-down approach called the single laboratory validation approach (EUROLAB guidelines). Main uncertainty sources considered were related to calibrators' assigned values, the intermediate precision, and the bias. As part of an institutional program, patients with osteoarticular infections are treated with ß-LA in continuous infusion and monitored to assure values at least 4 times over the minimal inhibitory concentration (4×MIC). We retrospectively evaluated the impact of two scenarios of laboratory reports on clinicians' expected decisions while monitoring the treatment: reports containing only the ß-LA values, or including the ß-LA coverage intervals (ß-LA values and their expanded measurement uncertainties). Results The relative expanded uncertainties for ATM, FEP, CAZ and PIP were lower than 26.7%, 26.4%, 28.8%, and 25.5%, respectively. Reporting the measurement uncertainty, we identified that clinicians may modify their decision especially in cases where 4×MIC values were within the ß-LA coverage intervals. Conclusions This study provides a simple method to estimate the measurement uncertainty of ß-LA values that can be easily applied in clinical laboratories. Further studies should confirm the potential impact of reporting measurement uncertainty on clinicians' decision-making while guiding antibiotic therapy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/sangre , Monitoreo de Drogas/métodos , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Aztreonam/sangre , Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Cefepima/sangre , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem , Incertidumbre
3.
Adv Exp Med Biol ; 1145: 181-195, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31364079

RESUMEN

Biofilm is an adaptive bacterial strategy whereby microorganisms become encased in a complex glycoproteic matrix. The low concentration of oxygen and nutrients in this environment leads to heterogeneous phenotypic changes in the bacteria, with antimicrobial tolerance being of paramount importance. As with other antibiotics, the activity of colistin is impaired by biofilm-embedded bacteria. Therefore, the recommendation for administering high doses in combination with a second drug, indicated for planktonic infections, remains valid in this setting. Notably, colistin has activity against metabolically inactive biofilm-embedded cells located in the inner layers of the biofilm structure. This is opposite and complementary to the activity of other antimicrobials that are able to kill metabolically active cells in the outer layers of the biofilm. Several experimental models have shown a higher activity of colistin when used in combination with other agents, and have reported that this can avoid the emergence of colistin-resistant subpopulations. Most experience of colistin in biofilm-associated infections comes from patients with cystic fibrosis, where the use of nebulized colistin allows high concentrations to reach the site of the infection. However, limited clinical experience is available in other scenarios, such as osteoarticular infections or device-related central nervous system infections caused by multi-drug resistant microorganisms. In the latter scenario, the use of intraventricular or intrathecal colistin also permits high local concentrations and good clinical results. Overall, the efficacy of intravenous colistin seems to be poor, but its association with a second antimicrobial significantly increases the response rate. Given its activity against inner bioflm-embedded cells, its possible role in combination with other antibiotics, beyond last-line therapy situations, should be further explored.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Biopelículas/efectos de los fármacos , Colistina/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones del Sistema Nervioso Central/tratamiento farmacológico , Fibrosis Quística/microbiología , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana
4.
Infection ; 46(2): 239-244, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29363049

RESUMEN

Continuous infusion (CI) of beta-lactams could optimize their pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices, especially in difficult-to-treat infections. PURPOSE: To validate an easy-to-use method to guide beta-lactams dosage in CI (formula). METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted of a prospectively collected cohort (n = 24 patients) with osteoarticular infections caused by Gram-negative bacilli (GNB) managed with beta-lactams in CI. Beta-lactams dose was calculated using a described formula (daily dose = 24 h × beta-lactam clearance × target "steady-state" concentration) to achieve concentrations above the MIC. We correlated the predicted concentration (Cpred = daily dose/24 h × beta-lactam clearance) with the patient's observed concentration (Cobs) measured by UPLC-MS/MS (Spearman's coefficient). RESULTS: The most frequent microorganism treated was P. aeruginosa (21 cases; 9 MDR). Beta-lactams in CI were ceftazidime (n = 14), aztreonam (7), and piperacillin/tazobactam (3), mainly used in combination (12 with colistin, 5 with ciprofloxacin) and administered without notable side effects. The plasma Cobs was higher overall than Cpred; the Spearman correlation between both concentrations was rho = 0.6 (IC 95%: 0.2-0.8) for all beta-lactams, and rho = 0.8 (IC 95%: 0.4-1) for those treated with ceftazidime. CONCLUSIONS: The formula may be useful in clinical practice for planning the initial dosage of beta-lactams in CI, while we await a systematic therapeutic drug monitoring. The use of beta-lactams in CI was safe.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Bacterias Gramnegativas/efectos de los fármacos , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/tratamiento farmacológico , beta-Lactamas/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/sangre , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/microbiología , Femenino , Bacterias Gramnegativas/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Bacterias Gramnegativas/microbiología , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , beta-Lactamas/administración & dosificación , beta-Lactamas/sangre , beta-Lactamas/farmacología
5.
Artículo en Inglés, Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28818482

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The anti-staphylococcal efficacy of cotrimoxazole in the setting of difficult-to-treat infections seems to be compromised by large amounts of pus and devitalized tissue, and, therefore, high levels of thymidine. Our objective was to evaluate the activity of cotrimoxazole against a staphylococcal foreign-body infection experimental model, which also yields significant quantities of thymidine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We used a rat tissue-cage model of infection (with high inherent thymidine levels) caused by a strain of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA; ATCC 29213). MIC values were determined (microdilution method) and compared in the presence or absence of tissue-cage fluid samples. RESULTS: The inefficacy of cotrimoxazole was found to be similar to that of the control group. The MIC of cotrimoxazole was 4-8 fold higher in the presence of rat tissue-cage fluid. CONCLUSIONS: The inefficacy of cotrimoxazole in our foreign-body infection model by MSSA, and the probable negative impact of the presence of thymidine on its efficacy, challenge the use of this drug in acute phases of foreign-body infections. It should be reserved as an alternative treatment when the infection is more controlled.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/uso terapéutico , Infección de Heridas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Carga Bacteriana , Cámaras de Difusión de Cultivos , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ratas , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/microbiología , Timidina/análisis , Insuficiencia del Tratamiento , Combinación Trimetoprim y Sulfametoxazol/farmacocinética , Infección de Heridas/etiología , Infección de Heridas/metabolismo
7.
Biomed Chromatogr ; 30(3): 410-8, 2016 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26184353

RESUMEN

Ceftazidime is an antibiotic belonging to the third generation of the cephalosporin family. It is indicated in the treatment of serious, simple or mixed bacterial infections, and its administration in continuous or intermittent infusion allows optimization of the concentration of antibiotic to keep it above the minimum inhibitory concentration. We developed and validated a chromatographic method by ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry to measure ceftazidime concentration in human plasma. Following extraction with acetonitrile and 1,2-dichloroethane, the chromatographic separation was achieved using an Acquity ® UPLC ® BEH(TM) (2.1 × 100 mm i.d., 1.7 µm) reverse-phase C18 column, with a water-acetonitrile linear gradient containing 0.1% formic acid at a 0.4 mL/min flow rate. Ceftazidime and its internal standard (cefotaxime) were detected by electrospray ionization mass spectrometry in positive ion multiple reaction monitoring mode using mass-to-charge transitions of 547.0 → 467.9/396.1 and 456.0 → 395.8/324.1, respectively. The limit of quantification was 0.58 mg/L and linearity was observed in the range 0.58-160 mg/L. Coefficients of variation and absolute relative biases were <9.8 and 8.4%. The mean recovery for ceftazidime was 74.4 ± 8.1%. Evaluation of the matrix effect showed ion enhancement, and no carry-over was observed. The validated method could be applied to daily clinical laboratory practice to measure the concentration of ceftazidime in plasma.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Óseas Infecciosas/tratamiento farmacológico , Ceftazidima/sangre , Ceftazidima/uso terapéutico , Cromatografía Líquida de Alta Presión/métodos , Espectrometría de Masas en Tándem/métodos , Ceftazidima/química , Monitoreo de Drogas , Estabilidad de Medicamentos , Humanos , Límite de Detección , Modelos Lineales , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
8.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 46(2): 189-95, 2015 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26051988

RESUMEN

Whilst levofloxacin (LVX) in combination with rifampicin (RIF) is considered the optimal treatment for prosthetic joint infection (PJI) caused by meticillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), no therapeutic alternatives have been accurately evaluated. Based on the high effectiveness of the combination of daptomycin (DAP) plus RIF against meticillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) in this setting, in this study the efficacy of DAP+RIF and DAP+LVX combinations was tested as alternative therapies for foreign-body infections (FBIs) caused by MSSA. A tissue-cage infection model was performed using an MSSA strain. Male Wistar rats were treated for 7 days with LVX, DAP, RIF or the combinations LVX+RIF, DAP+RIF and DAP+LVX. Antibiotic efficacy was evaluated by bacterial counts from tissue cage fluid (TCF) and the cure rate was determined from adhered bacteria. Resistance was screened. Monotherapies were less effective than combinations (P<0.05), and resistance to DAP and RIF emerged. DAP+RIF (decrease in bacterial counts in TCF, -4.9logCFU/mL; cure rate, 92%) was the most effective therapy (P<0.05). There were no differences between LVX+RIF (-3.4logCFU/mL; 11%) and DAP+LVX (-3.3logCFU/mL; 47%). No resistant strains appeared with combined therapies. In conclusion, the combinations DAP+RIF and DAP+LVX showed good efficacy and prevented resistance. DAP+RIF provided higher efficacy than LVX+RIF. These DAP combinations were efficacious alternatives therapies for MSSA FBI. Further studies should confirm whether DAP+RIF may be useful as a first-line therapy in the setting of PJI caused by MSSA.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Daptomicina/administración & dosificación , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Levofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Ratas Wistar , Rifampin/administración & dosificación , Resultado del Tratamiento
9.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(9): 5576-80, 2014 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24957833

RESUMEN

We compared the efficacies of daptomycin (doses equivalent to 8 to 10 mg/kg of body weight/day in humans) and cloxacillin alone with those of cloxacillin-rifampin and cloxacillin-daptomycin combinations, using a tissue cage methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) infection model. Monotherapies were less effective than combinations (P<0.05), and daptomycin resistance emerged. Cloxacillin-daptomycin proved as effective as cloxacillin-rifampin and prevented the appearance of resistance; this combination may be an alternative anti-MSSA therapy, which may offer greater benefits in the early treatment of prosthetic joint infections (PJI).


Asunto(s)
Cloxacilina/uso terapéutico , Daptomicina/uso terapéutico , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Staphylococcus aureus/efectos de los fármacos , Animales , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cloxacilina/farmacocinética , Daptomicina/farmacocinética , Combinación de Medicamentos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Rifampin/farmacocinética
10.
J Infect ; 58(3): 220-6, 2009 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19217166

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Since levofloxacin at high doses was the best therapy in staphylococcal tissue-cage model of foreign-body infection, we hypothesized that moxifloxacin with higher ratio of area under the concentration-time curve to the MIC (AUC/MIC) would provide better results. METHODS: MICs, MBCs, MPCs (mutant prevention concentration) and 24h kill-curves were determined in the log and stationary phases. Using the aforementioned model, we tested the efficacy of levofloxacin 100mg/kg/d, moxifloxacin 40mg/kg/d and moxifloxacin 80mg/kg/d; they were equivalent to human levels for 1000mg/d, 400mg/d and 800mg/d, respectively. We screened for the appearance of resistant strains. RESULTS: MICs and MBCs in logarithmic and stationary phases and MPCs of levofloxacin were 0.5, 1 and 4, 0.8microg/ml, respectively, and those of moxifloxacin 0.12, 0.25 and 2, 0.25microg/ml. AUC/MIC were 234 (levofloxacin), 431 (moxifloxacin 40) and 568 (moxifloxacin 80). Bacterial counts decreases in tissue-cage fluids (means of logCFU/ml) were -1.81 (n=25), -1.31 (23), and -1.46 (20), respectively; for controls it was 0.24 (22). All groups were better than controls (p<0.05); no differences between them existed. CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin with higher AUC/MIC ratio did not improve the efficacy of high doses of levofloxacin.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Compuestos Aza/uso terapéutico , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Levofloxacino , Ofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Compuestos Aza/administración & dosificación , Compuestos Aza/farmacocinética , Compuestos Aza/farmacología , Fluoroquinolonas , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Viabilidad Microbiana , Modelos Animales , Moxifloxacino , Ofloxacino/administración & dosificación , Ofloxacino/farmacocinética , Ofloxacino/farmacología , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/farmacocinética , Quinolinas/farmacología , Ratas , Ratas Wistar , Factores de Tiempo
11.
J Infect ; 57(3): 229-35, 2008 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18715649

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The knowledge about efficacy of linezolid alone or in combination with rifampin in device infections is limited. We test their in vitro and in vivo efficacy in a rat model of foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible S. aureus. METHODS: In vitro studies for logarithmic and stationary bacteria were performed. In vivo efficacy (decrease in bacterial counts in tissue cage fluid) was evaluated at: (i) after 7-day therapy (groups: linezolid, cloxacillin, rifampin, linezolid-rifampin and cloxacillin-rifampin); and (ii) after 10-day therapy (groups: rifampin and linezolid-rifampin). RESULTS: After 7-day therapy all groups were significantly better than controls; linezolid (Delta log cfu/ml: -0.59, no resistant strains) and cloxacillin (-0.85) were the least effective therapy; linezolid was significantly less active (P<0.05) than rifampin (-1.22, resistance 90%), cloxacillin-rifampin (-1.3) and linezolid-rifampin (-1.14). After 10-day therapy linezolid-rifampin was the most effective treatment (Delta log -1.44, no resistance, P<0.05); in contrast, rifampin resulted ineffective (Delta log 0.1) due to the growth of resistant strains (100%). CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid alone showed moderate efficacy, whereas its combination with rifampin prevented the emergence of rifampin resistance. The efficacy of linezolid-rifampin combination was initially similar to that of rifampin alone, but in contrast to rifampin, it increased over time revealing the impact of protection against rifampin resistance and the benefits of rifampin activity.


Asunto(s)
Acetamidas/uso terapéutico , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cuerpos Extraños/complicaciones , Oxazolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Rifampin/uso terapéutico , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones Estafilocócicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , Recuento de Colonia Microbiana , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana , Quimioterapia Combinada , Linezolid , Masculino , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Viabilidad Microbiana , Ratas , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/microbiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Rev. cienc. adm. financ. segur. soc ; 3(2): 13-18, jul.-dic. 1995. ilus
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: lil-324635

RESUMEN

Desde finales de la década anterior, la CCSS ha venido impulsando el desarrollo de nuevos modelos de prestación de los servicios ambulatorios de salud, uno de los cuales ha sido la contratación de cooperativas autogestionarias para la prestación de tales servicios. En términos generales, este nuevo modelo ha resultado muy eficaz en cuanto a la aceptación por parte de los usuarios. No obstante, los limitados recursos de que dispone la Institrución y su obligación de brindar esos servicios en forma equitativa a toda la población, obligan a realizar una evaluación del modelo, desde la perspectiva costo-beneficio. Lo anterior con el fin de determinar la sostenibilidad del mismo a largo plazo, así como sus posibilidades de extensión a otras áreas geográficas del país. Este artículo presenta los resultados de un estudio efectuado, precisamente, con el fin de determinar las perspectivas de sostenibilidad y ampliación del Modelo de Atención de los Servicios Ambulatorios de Salud mediante Cooperativas Autogestionarias.


Asunto(s)
Servicios de Salud Comunitaria , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Eficiencia , Eficiencia Organizacional , Modelos Organizacionales , Pacientes Ambulatorios , Atención al Paciente , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Servicios de Salud , Costa Rica
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA