Using Feedback Control to Reduce Limb Impedance during Forceful Contractions.

Little is known about the ability to precisely regulate forces or torques during unexpected disturbances, as required during numerous tasks. Effective force regulation implies small changes in force responding to externally imposed displacements, a behavior characterized by low limb impedance. This task can be challenging, since the intrinsic impedance of muscles increases when generating volitional forces. The purpose of this study was to examine the ability to voluntarily reduce limb impedance during force regulation, and the neural mechanisms associated with that ability. Small displacement perturbations were used to quantify elbow impedance during the exertion of volitional elbow torques from 0% to 20% of maximum voluntary contraction. Subjects were instructed either to not intervene with the imposed perturbations or to explicitly intervene so as to minimize the influence of the perturbations on the elbow torque. Our results demonstrated that individuals can reduce the low frequency components of elbow impedance by 35%. Electromyographic analysis suggested that this behavior is mediated by volitional and possibly long-latency reflex pathways with delays of at least 120 ms. These results provide a context for understanding how feedback altered by aging or injuries may influence the ability to regulate forces precisely.

Corticomotor excitability of arm muscles modulates according to static position and orientation of the upper limb.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated how multi-joint changes in static upper limb posture impact the corticomotor excitability of the posterior deltoid (PD) and biceps brachii (BIC), and evaluated whether postural variations in excitability related directly to changes in target muscle length. METHODS: The amplitude of individual motor evoked potentials (MEPs) was evaluated in each of thirteen different static postures. Four functional postures were investigated that varied in shoulder and elbow angle, while the forearm was positioned in each of three orientations. Posture-related changes in muscle lengths were assessed using a biomechanical arm model. Additionally, M-waves were evoked in the BIC in each of three forearm orientations to assess the impact of posture on recorded signal characteristics. RESULTS: BIC-MEP amplitudes were altered by shoulder and elbow posture, and demonstrated robust changes according to forearm orientation. Observed changes in BIC-MEP amplitudes exceeded those of the M-waves. PD-MEP amplitudes changed predominantly with shoulder posture, but were not completely independent of influence from forearm orientation. CONCLUSIONS: Results provide evidence that overall corticomotor excitability can be modulated according to multi-joint upper limb posture. SIGNIFICANCE: The ability to alter motor pathway excitability using static limb posture suggests the importance of posture selection during rehabilitation aimed at retraining individual muscle recruitment and/or overall coordination patterns.