Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Br J Anaesth ; 124(3): 292-298, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31862159

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Clinicians traditionally warn patients of pain before peripheral i.v. cannulation (PIVC). However, using words related to pain or undesirable experiences can result in greater pain and anxiety. The use of positive words can improve pain perception and subjective patient experience. We aimed to compare the effects of three types of communication, including hypnotic communication, on pain, comfort, and anxiety in patients during PIVC. METHODS: The Effect of Language and Confusion on Pain During Peripheral Intravenous Catheterization (KTHYPE) trial is a randomised, parallel, single-blind, multicentre study of patients undergoing PIVC on the dorsal face of the hand before surgery. Patients from three hospitals were randomly allocated to one of three groups: PIVC performed with a hypnosis technique (hypnosis group), negative connotation (nocebo group), and neutral connotation (neutral group). The primary outcome measure was the occurrence of pain measured with a 0-10 numerical rating scale just after PIVC. RESULTS: Of the 272 subjects analysed (hypnosis, n=89; nocebo, n=92; neutral, n=91), pain after PIVC was lower in the hypnosis group (mean [standard deviation]; range) (1.5 [1.9]; 0-5) compared with the neutral (3.5 [2.3]; 0-9; P<0.0001) and nocebo groups (3.8 [2.5]; 0-10; P<0.0001). Whilst anxiety was higher and comfort lower before PIVC in the hypnosis group, anxiety decreased and comfort perception increased after PIVC when hypnosis was used. CONCLUSIONS: This is one of the first well-designed RCTs showing a significant benefit of a hypnosis technique during a routine procedure, such as PIVC. The results could facilitate implementation of hypnosis in daily clinical care. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT02662322.


Asunto(s)
Ansiedad/prevención & control , Cateterismo Periférico/efectos adversos , Comunicación , Hipnosis/métodos , Dolor/prevención & control , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Ansiedad/etiología , Ansiedad/psicología , Cateterismo Periférico/métodos , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor/etiología , Dolor/psicología , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Percepción del Dolor , Método Simple Ciego , Adulto Joven
2.
Int J Clin Exp Hypn ; 66(2): 134-146, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29601275

RESUMEN

This two-center quasiexperimental pilot study was to determine the effect of conversational hypnosis on patient comfort and parasympathetic tone, which may represent a quantitative measure of hypnotic depth, during regional anesthesia. The patients received conversational hypnosis in one center and oral premedication in the other. The patients' subjective comfort (0-10 rating scale) and objective parasympathetic tone, as assessed by the Analgesia/Nociception Index (ANI), were measured before and after regional anesthesia. The parasympathetic tone and comfort scores evidenced a significantly greater increase in the hypnosis patients than in controls. These findings suggest that using conversational hypnosis during regional anesthesia may be followed by a subjective increase in patient comfort and an objective increase in parasympathetic tone, monitored by ANI.


Asunto(s)
Brazo/cirugía , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/métodos , Hipnosis/métodos , Comodidad del Paciente/métodos , Adulto , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/efectos adversos , Bloqueo del Plexo Braquial/psicología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sistema Nervioso Parasimpático/fisiología , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA