Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 9 de 9
Filtrar
1.
AIDS Care ; 36(2): 181-187, 2024 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37856839

RESUMEN

Current models of care delivery are failing patients with complexity, like those living with HIV, mental illness and other psychosocial challenges. These patients often require resource-intensive personalized care across hospital and community settings, but available supports can be fragmented and challenging to access and navigate. To improve this, the authors created a program to enhance integrated, trauma-informed care through an innovative educational role for a HIV community caseworker embedded in an academic HIV Psychiatry clinic, called the Mental Health Clinical Fellowship. Through qualitative interviews with 21 participants (patients, physicians, clinicians and Mental Health Clinical Fellows) from October 2020-March 2023, the authors explore how implementation of this program affects patient experiences and satisfaction with care. Patients described their care experiences as less stigmatizing, more accessible, holistic and coordinated. They often attributed this to the integration between fellow and psychiatrist, and specifically the accessible stance of community organizations embedded within a hospital, which helped build trust. Interchangeable and integrated support by caseworker and psychiatrist improved patient engagement in psychiatric management and patient satisfaction with their care. Cross-context and cross-disciplinary care provision that includes providers from community and hospital working directly together to deliver care can improve care for patients with significant complexity.


Asunto(s)
Infecciones por VIH , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Integración a la Comunidad , Infecciones por VIH/terapia , Trastornos Mentales/terapia , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Hospitales , Satisfacción del Paciente
2.
Med Teach ; 44(7): 800-811, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35199616

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Medical school curricula require regular updating. We adopted an activity theory lens to conduct a holistic, multiple stakeholder-informed analysis of curricular reform, aiming to understand how the social relations between groups contribute to unanticipated tensions and outcomes. METHODS: A research assistant conducted semi-structured interviews with purposively sampled (N = 19) administrative staff, faculty course leads, faculty tutors, curriculum developers, change leaders and student leaders. The team applied a framework analysis to guide within and between stakeholder comparisons. RESULTS: Participants reported unique (N = 21) and cross-cutting (N = 17) contradictions underscoring emerging drivers of current and potential change. Unique contradictions raised by 1-2 groups represented seeds of change that had the potential to spread across all groups. By contrast, two general types of cross-cutting contradictions arose when one group had a dominant, confirming voice or two or more groups had contrasting perspectives. CONCLUSIONS: While finding contradictions was expected, our analysis profiled their nature and some of the specific tensions they raised across and within stakeholder groups. The activity theory lens provided an accessible way to unravel curricular reform into manageable units of analysis. Systematically identifying contradictions arising from curricular reform will help stakeholders collaborate with a shared purpose toward positive, sustained change.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Estudiantes de Medicina , Curriculum , Docentes , Humanos , Facultades de Medicina
3.
BMJ Open ; 10(7): e034970, 2020 07 27.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32718923

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to examine patients' experiences in integrated care (IC) settings. DESIGN: Qualitative study using semistructured interviews. SETTINGS: Two IC sites in Toronto, Canada: (1) a community-based primary healthcare centre, supporting patients with hepatitis C and comorbid mental health and substance use issues; and (2) an integrated bariatric surgery programme, an academic tertiary care centre. PARTICIPANTS: The study included patients (n=12) with co-occurring mental and physical health conditions. Seven participants (58%) were female and five (42%) were male. METHODS: Twelve indepth semistructured interviews were conducted with a purposeful sample of patients (n=12) with comorbid mental and physical conditions at two IC sites in Toronto between 2017 and 2018. Data were collected and analysed using grounded theory approach. RESULTS: Four themes emerged in our analysis reflecting patients' perspectives on patient-centred care experience in IC: (1) caring about me; (2) collaborating with me; (3) helping me understand and self-manage my care; and (4) personalising care to address my needs. Patients' experiences of care were primarily shaped by quality of relational interactions with IC team members. Positive interactions with IC team members led to enhanced patient access to care and fostered personalising care plans to address unique needs. CONCLUSION: This study adds to the literature on creating patient-centredness in IC settings by highlighting the importance of recognising patients' unique needs and the context of care for the specific patient population.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Centros Médicos Académicos , Cirugía Bariátrica , Centros Comunitarios de Salud , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Hepatitis C , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos Mentales , Ontario , Proyectos Piloto , Investigación Cualitativa , Automanejo
4.
Teach Learn Med ; 32(2): 159-167, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31482737

RESUMEN

Phenomenon: Despite the emergence of the integrated care (IC) model, IC is variably taught and is challenged by current siloed competency domains. This study aimed to define IC competencies spanning multiple competency domains. Approach: Iterative facilitated discussions were conducted at a half-day education retreat with 25 key informants including clinician educators and education scientists. Seven one-on-one semistructured interviews were subsequently conducted with different interprofessional providers in IC settings within a Canadian context. Data collection grounded in patient cases with a physical illness and concurrent mental illness (medical psychiatry) were used to elicit identification of complex patient needs and the key medical psychiatry knowledge and skills required to address these needs. A thematic analysis of transcripts was performed using constant comparison to iteratively identify themes. Findings: Participants described 4 broad competency domains necessary for expertise in IC: (a) extensive integrated knowledge of biopsychosocial aspects of disease, systems of care, and social determinants of care; (b) skills to establish a longitudinal alliance with the patient and functional relationships with colleagues; (c) constructing a comprehensive understanding of individual patients' complex needs and how these can be met within their health and social systems; and (d) the ability to effectively meet the patient's needs using IC models. These 4 domains were linked by an overarching philosophy of care encompassing key enabling attitudes such as proactively pursuing depth to understand patient and system complexity while maintaining a patient-centered approach. Insights: The study addresses how development of IC expertise can be fostered by integration of individual IC competency domains. The findings align with previous research suggesting that competencies from existing frameworks are being enacted jointly in expert capabilities to meet the complex needs of patients, in this case with comorbid physical and mental health concerns.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Educación de Pregrado en Medicina , Salud Mental , Psiquiatría , Canadá , Curriculum , Humanos , Entrevistas como Asunto , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Gen Hosp Psychiatry ; 61: 1-9, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31479842

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Despite the established clinical and cost-effectiveness of integrated care (IC) models for patients with comorbid mental and physical illness, little is known about whether these models facilitate a better care experience from the patient's perspective. The authors conducted a scoping review of the literature to explore how IC influences patients' care experiences. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PSYC INFO CINAHL, AMED, the Cochrane Library, and grey literature were searched to identify relevant articles. Eligible studies were systematically reviewed and analyzed, using thematic analysis approach, to identify patterns, trends, and variation in patient experience within IC settings. RESULTS: Search results yielded 5250 unique resources of which 21 primary studies met our eligibility criteria for analysis. Findings from this scoping review revealed variation in patients' experiences in IC settings. IC models enhanced patients' experience by creating theraputic spaces: improving patient access to care, developing collaborative relationships, and personalizing patient care to address individual needs. CONCLUSION: Productive interactions with care team were key to improve patient engagement and experience of centeredness in IC settings. Successful implementation of IC demanded purposeful alignment of IC structural components and care processes to create therapeutic spaces that address patient care needs and preferences.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Servicios de Salud Mental , Satisfacción del Paciente , Atención Dirigida al Paciente , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos
6.
Med Educ ; 52(4): 364-375, 2018 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29105813

RESUMEN

CONTEXT: We evaluate programmes in health professions education (HPE) to determine their effectiveness and value. Programme evaluation has evolved from use of reductionist frameworks to those addressing the complex interactions between programme factors. Researchers in HPE have recently suggested a 'holistic programme evaluation' aiming to better describe and understand the implications of 'emergent processes and outcomes'. FRAMEWORK: We propose a programme evaluation framework informed by principles and tools from systems engineering. Systems engineers conceptualise complexity and emergent elements in unique ways that may complement and extend contemporary programme evaluations in HPE. We demonstrate how the abstract decomposition space (ADS), an engineering knowledge elicitation tool, provides the foundation for a systems engineering informed programme evaluation designed to capture both planned and emergent programme elements. METHODS: We translate the ADS tool to use education-oriented language, and describe how evaluators can use it to create a programme-specific ADS through iterative refinement. We provide a conceptualisation of emergent elements and an equation that evaluators can use to identify the emergent elements in their programme. Using our framework, evaluators can analyse programmes not as isolated units with planned processes and planned outcomes, but as unfolding, complex interactive systems that will exhibit emergent processes and emergent outcomes. Subsequent analysis of these emergent elements will inform the evaluator as they seek to optimise and improve the programme. CONCLUSION: Our proposed systems engineering informed programme evaluation framework provides principles and tools for analysing the implications of planned and emergent elements, as well as their potential interactions. We acknowledge that our framework is preliminary and will require application and constant refinement. We suggest that our framework will also advance our understanding of the construct of 'emergence' in HPE research.


Asunto(s)
Empleos en Salud/educación , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Lenguaje
7.
BMJ Open ; 7(12): e018311, 2017 Dec 14.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29247100

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Integrated care (IC) models have emerged to address gaps in care for individuals with complex healthcare needs. Although the clinical and cost-effectiveness of IC models are well-established, our understanding of whether IC models facilitate a patient-centred care experience from the patients' perspective is not well understood. This scoping review aims to comprehensively map the literature to provide a broad overview of patients' experiences in IC settings with a focus on the experiences of complex patients with comorbid mental and physical illnesses. It also aims to describe current gaps identified in the literature in our understanding of aspects of care that are often unrecognised. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Using established scoping review frameworks and guidelines, we will perform a comprehensive search in the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, AMED and the Cochrane Library to identify relevant studies on patients' experiences in IC models. Grey literature sources and studies bibliographies will also be searched to identify relevant studies and documents. Data will be extracted and summarised using descriptive statistical and qualitative analyses. We will also consult with stakeholders from various backgrounds to enhance the comprehensiveness of this review. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review requires no ethical approval. Findings from this study will be disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal, clinical conferences and in knowledge translation settings, aiming to improve clinical practice and care delivery.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/normas , Atención Dirigida al Paciente/organización & administración , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Humanos , Proyectos de Investigación
9.
J Grad Med Educ ; 8(3): 364-71, 2016 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27413439

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Simulation-based training is currently embedded in most health professions education curricula. Without evidence for how trainees think about their simulation-based learning, some training techniques may not support trainees' learning strategies. OBJECTIVE: This study explored how residents think about and self-regulate learning during a lumbar puncture (LP) training session using a simulator. METHODS: In 2010, 20 of 45 postgraduate year 1 internal medicine residents attended a mandatory procedural skills training boot camp. Independently, residents practiced the entire LP skill on a part-task trainer using a clinical LP tray and proper sterile technique. We interviewed participants regarding how they thought about and monitored their learning processes, and then we conducted a thematic analysis of the interview data. RESULTS: The analysis suggested that participants considered what they could and could not learn from the simulator; they developed their self-confidence by familiarizing themselves with the LP equipment and repeating the LP algorithmic steps. Participants articulated an idiosyncratic model of learning they used to interpret the challenges and successes they experienced. Participants reported focusing on obtaining cerebrospinal fluid and memorizing the "routine" version of the LP procedure. They did not report much thinking about their learning strategies (eg, self-questioning). CONCLUSIONS: During simulation-based training, residents described assigning greater weight to achieving procedural outcomes and tended to think that the simulated task provided them with routine, generalizable skills. Over this typical 1-hour session, trainees did not appear to consider their strategic mindfulness (ie, awareness and use of learning strategies).


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Aprendizaje , Atención Plena , Humanos , Medicina Interna/educación , Internado y Residencia , Simulación de Paciente , Punción Espinal
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA