Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
BMJ Open ; 12(1): e053641, 2022 01 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34992113

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To examine the factors associated with COVID-19 vaccine receipt among healthcare workers and the role of vaccine confidence in decisions to vaccinate, and to better understand concerns related to COVID-19 vaccination. DESIGN: Cross-sectional anonymous survey among front-line, support service and administrative healthcare workers. SETTING: Two large integrated healthcare systems (one private and one public) in New York City during the initial roll-out of the COVID-19 vaccine. PARTICIPANTS: 1933 healthcare workers, including nurses, physicians, allied health professionals, environmental services staff, researchers and administrative staff. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was COVID-19 vaccine receipt during the initial roll-out of the vaccine among healthcare workers. RESULTS: Among 1933 healthcare workers who had been offered the vaccine, 81% had received the vaccine at the time of the survey. Receipt was lower among black (58%; OR: 0.14, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.2) compared with white (91%) healthcare workers, and higher among non-Hispanic (84%) compared with Hispanic (69%; OR: 2.37, 95% CI 1.8 to 3.1) healthcare workers. Among healthcare workers with concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, 65% received the vaccine. Among healthcare workers who agreed with the statement that the vaccine is important to protect family members, 86% were vaccinated. Of those who disagreed, 25% received the vaccine (p<0.001). In a multivariable analysis, concern about being experimented on (OR: 0.44, 95% CI 0.31 to 0.6), concern about COVID-19 vaccine safety (OR: 0.39, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.55), lack of influenza vaccine receipt (OR: 0.28, 95% CI 0.18 to 0.44), disagreeing that COVID-19 vaccination is important to protect others (OR: 0.37, 95% CI 0.27 to 0.52) and black race (OR: 0.38, 95% CI 0.24 to 0.59) were independently associated with COVID-19 vaccine non-receipt. Over 70% of all healthcare workers responded that they had been approached for vaccine advice multiple times by family, community members and patients. CONCLUSIONS: Our data demonstrated high overall receipt among healthcare workers. Even among healthcare workers with concerns about COVID-19 vaccine safety, side effects or being experimented on, over 50% received the vaccine. Attitudes around the importance of COVID-19 vaccination to protect others played a large role in healthcare workers' decisions to vaccinate. We observed striking inequities in COVID-19 vaccine receipt, particularly affecting black and Hispanic workers. Further research is urgently needed to address issues related to vaccine equity and uptake in the context of systemic racism and barriers to care. This is particularly important given the influence healthcare workers have in vaccine decision-making conversations in their communities.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , Estudios Transversales , Personal de Salud , Humanos , Ciudad de Nueva York , SARS-CoV-2 , Racismo Sistemático , Vacunación
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 63(9): e650-e656, 2021 Sep 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34491973

RESUMEN

Climate change is an urgent challenge amplified by socioeconomic factors that demands thoughtful public health responses from OEM professionals. This guidance statement from the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine focuses on the different strategies that these health professionals can implement to protect workers from health impacts associated with climate change hazards, foster workplace resilience in the face of rapidly changing environments, and take the necessary steps to mitigate the effects of global climate change.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Ambiental , Medicina del Trabajo , Aclimatación , Adaptación Fisiológica , Cambio Climático , Humanos , Estados Unidos
3.
J Occup Environ Med ; 60(2): e76-e81, 2018 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29252921

RESUMEN

: Workers are uniquely susceptible to the health hazards imposed by environmental changes. Occupational and environmental medicine (OEM) providers are at the forefront of emerging health issues pertaining to working populations including climate change, and must be prepared to recognize, respond to, and mitigate climate change-related health effects in workers. This guidance document from the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine focuses on North American workers health effects that may occur as a result of climate change and describes the responsibilities of the OEM provider in responding to these health challenges.


Asunto(s)
Cambio Climático , Medicina Ambiental/normas , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Medicina del Trabajo/normas , Rol Profesional , Animales , Vectores de Enfermedades , Calor/efectos adversos , Humanos , Desastres Naturales , Enfermedades Profesionales/diagnóstico , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Salud Laboral , Estrés Psicológico/inducido químicamente , Estrés Psicológico/prevención & control , Rayos Ultravioleta/efectos adversos , Enfermedades Transmitidas por el Agua/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades Transmitidas por el Agua/prevención & control
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA