Comparison of the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen for treating recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma in older and younger adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a geriatric cancer. However, older adult patients are frequently underrepresented in large clinical trials. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of the EXTREME regimen (platinum + fluorouracil + cetuximab) in older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC treated with the EXTREME regimen were retrospectively analyzed. We compare the efficacy and safety in older (aged ≥70 years) younger (aged <70 years) adult patients. Of the 86 patients examined in this study, 21 (24.4%) were older adults. There was no difference in overall response rate (46.9% vs 38.5%, P = .76), median progression-free survival [5.7 months vs 5.8 months, hazard ratio (HR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.52-1.51, P = .66] and overall survival (OS) (14.6 months vs 15.2 months, HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.43-1.43, P = .44) in younger vs older patients. There was also no difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 adverse events between groups. The exploratory analysis for geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) showed the association with lower GNRI (≤98) and poor OS in older adult patients (37.7 months vs 7.0 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.31-0.89, P = .002). CONCLUSIONS: The EXTREME regimen with optimal dose modification is safe and effective for both older and younger adult patients with HNSCC. The GNRI can be an indicator to select the older adult patients who can get benefit from the EXTREME regimen.

Perspectives on non-clinical safety evaluation of drug metabolites through the JSOT workshop.

The prompt and appropriate safety assessment of drug metabolite(s) was mentioned in regulatory guidances such as an International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH) guidance, entitled "Guidance on Non-clinical Safety Studies for the Conduct of Human Clinical Trials and Marketing Authorization for Pharmaceuticals" (ICH M3(R2)) implemented in January 1 of 2011 in Japan, and has become a significant issue in the drug development. Upon release of ICH M3(R2) Step 4, a survey was conducted between March and April 2010 on the safety assessment of drug metabolites in 63 member companies of the Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association (JPMA). The Pharmacokinetics Team in the Non-Clinical Evaluation Expert Committee in JPMA conducted a questionnaire survey and compiled the results to comprehend how safety of drug metabolites are currently assessed at research-based pharmaceutical companies in Japan. The assessment of "Metabolites in Safety Testing" (MIST) can be divided into three stages based on the research purpose as follows: MIST 1 is a stage of estimating human drug metabolites and predicting their potential risks, MIST 2 is a stage of deciding the necessity for non-clinical safety studies, and MIST 3 is a stage of conducting non-clinical safety studies. In this paper, we propose typical approaches on safety assessment of metabolites that meet the purpose of each stage, considering the current level of scientific technology. Our proposals are based on the results from our survey and a symposium about the safety assessment of drug metabolites at the 37th annual meeting of the Japanese Society of Toxicology held in June 2010.

Clinical efficacy and prognostic factors for overall survival in Japanese patients with metastatic renal cell cancer treated with sunitinib.

UNLABELLED: Study Type--Therapy (case series). Level of Evidence 4. What's known on the subject? and What does the study add? A randomized prospective phase III clinical trial for systemic treatment-naïve metastatic renal cell cancer (RCC) patients demonstrated the superiority of sunitinib over interferon with an acceptable safety profile. However, a commonly asked question is whether patients with RCC in clinical trials are representative of those with this disease being seen in ordinary clinical practice. To our knowledge, this is the first report of sunitinib for the Japanese patients with metastatic RCC in ordinary clinical practice. The estimated median PFS and OS in this study were 9.3 and 32.2 months, respectively. The application of the MSKCC model distinctly separated OS curves (P<0.001), suggesting that MSKCC prognostic factors might be still valid to predict survival in metastatic RCC in the era of molecular targeted therapy. OBJECTIVES: • To report the treatment efficacy and safety profile of sunitinib for patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) in ordinary clinical practice. • In addition, to investigate the prognostic clinicopathological factors in these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: • The present study consisted of native Japanese patients with metastatic RCC, comprising 29 pretreated and 34 systemic treatment-naïve patients. • Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed by the log-rank test and the Cox proportional hazards model, respectively. RESULTS: • Estimated median progression-free survival and overall survival (OS) were 9.3 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 5.0-13.7) and 32.2 months (95% CI, 24.4-40.0), respectively. • Among the patients pretreated before sunitinib, two patients were treated with initialized systemic therapy with sorafenib and the remaining 27 were initialized with interferon-α. • The OS from the initial systemic therapy of the patients in pretreated groups was 79.6 months (95% CI, 14.6-144.5). • The application of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center model distinctly separated the OS curves (P < 0.001). • The most common grade 3 adverse events were fatigue (53%), thrombocytopaenia (48%), hand-foot syndrome (16%), anaemia (20%), hypertension (10%) and leucopaenia (9%), although these events were manageable and reversible. CONCLUSIONS: • Sunitinib has a favourable efficacy/safety profile for Japanese metastatic RCC patients in clinical practice. • The estimated median OS was >2 years with acceptable tolerability. • The median OS from the initial systemic therapy of the pretreated patients was >6 years. • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center prognostic factors still appear to be valid for predicting survival in metastatic RCC in the era of molecular targeted therapy.

Tumor size is a potential predictor of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in renal cell cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the correlations between the initial tumor size and size reduction rate in patients treated with targeted agents. To select the patients who can benefit the most from treatment with targeted agents, it will be necessary to find a tumor characteristic that predicts their effectiveness. METHODS: The data from 139 metastatic and 16 primary lesions treated with the targeted agents were retrospectively analyzed. They consisted of 86 sunitinib-treated and 69 sorafenib-treated lesions in 54 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who had undergone treatment from April 2008 to July 2010. The relationship between the longest tumor diameter at baseline and the rate of reduction in tumor size was assessed using the Spearmancorrelation test. RESULTS: A linear, moderate to strong association between the initial tumor size and tumor size reduction rate was shown (correlation coefficient -0.441, P < .001). When these tumors were divided into 2 groups at the threshold value (23.95 mm), which was decided by the receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the smaller tumors demonstrated a significantly greater size reduction than the larger tumors according to the Mann-Whitney U test (P < .001). Both univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses revealed that only the initial tumor size was associated with the rate of reduction in individual tumors (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The initial tumor size was a good predictor of the tumor size reduction. This simple observation could be useful for physicians who treat patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. In addition, in assessing clinical trials of targeted agents for metastatic renal cell carcinoma using the ResponseEvaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, perhaps this association should be considered.