Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 85(8): 629-638, 2018 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30102593

RESUMEN

In caring for patients with chronic kidney disease, it is important to prevent and treat hyperphosphatemia with a combination of dietary restrictions and phosphorus binders. This review describes the pathophysiology and control of hyperphosphatemia and the different classes of phosphorus binders with respect to their availability, cost, side effects, and scenarios in which one class of binder may be more beneficial than another.


Asunto(s)
Quelantes/uso terapéutico , Hiperfosfatemia/fisiopatología , Fósforo/sangre , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/sangre , Humanos , Hiperfosfatemia/etiología , Diálisis Renal/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/complicaciones , Insuficiencia Renal Crónica/terapia
2.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol ; 37(1): 41-6, 2013 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23263895

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to identify the characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of periprocedural cerebrovascular accident (PCVA) during electrophysiologic (EP) procedures. BACKGROUND: Periprocedural cerebrovascular accident is one of the most feared complications during EP procedures with very few data regarding its characteristics, management, and outcomes. METHODS: Between January 1998 and December 2008, we reviewed 30,032 invasive EP procedures for PCVA occurrence and characteristics. Management and outcomes were also determined. RESULTS: Thirty-eight CVAs were identified. Twenty (53 %) were intraprocedural and 18 (47 %) postprocedural. Thirty-two (84 %) were classified as strokes and six (16 %) as transient ischemic attacks. All CVAs except one (37, 97 %) were ischemic and the vast majority occurred during ablation procedures (36, 95 %). Among the 31 patients with ischemic stroke, 11 (35 %) were treated with reperfusion (eight catheter-based therapy and three intravenous t-PA) of whom five (46 %) had complete recovery, three (27 %) had partial recovery, and three (27 %) had no recovery. No hemorrhagic transformations occurred. CONCLUSION: Periprocedural cerebrovascular accident during EP procedures is rare and is almost always ischemic. It occurs more frequently during ablation procedures. Reperfusion therapy is feasible and safe.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Cardíaco/mortalidad , Técnicas Electrofisiológicas Cardíacas/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/mortalidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ohio/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Análisis de Supervivencia , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA