Efficacy of microneedling versus fractional Er:YAG laser in facial rejuvenation.

BACKGROUND: Microneedling and fractional lasers have been used in facial rejuvenation with acceptable results and low adverse effects. AIMS: To compare the efficacy of microneedling with fractional Er:YAG in facial skin rejuvenation. PATIENTS/METHODS: This study was planned as a split-face clinical trial. Volunteers were randomly allocated to receive three monthly treatments on each side of the face, one with fractional Er:YAG laser and one with microneedling. The assessments included investigating clinical outcomes by two blinded dermatologists accompanied by measuring skin biophysical characteristics including cutaneous resonance running time (CRRT) and transepidermal water loss (TEWL). Moreover, possible adverse effects, downtime, and patients' satisfaction were recorded at baseline, 1 month after each treatment, and 3 months after the last treatment session. The protocol was approved by the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20160820029436N3). RESULTS: Of the 32 selected volunteers, 24 subjects completed the study. The clinical assessment showed a significant improvement of the face appearance along with a significant reduction in dyschromia, and periorbital wrinkling (P-value < .05), with both procedures without any considerable difference between two methods. Moreover, the patients showed substantial satisfaction with both modalities with no statistically significant difference. Mean TEWL and CRRT values also decreased significantly in both groups with no considerable difference. The downtime was significantly shorter in the microneedling-treated side. There were no long-lasting or severe adverse effects after treatment with both methods. CONCLUSION: Microneedling and fractional Er:YAG laser have comparable efficacy in facial rejuvenation, but little downtime of the former makes it preferable for many patients.

Efficacy and safety of oral silymarin in comparison with oral doxycycline and their combination therapy in the treatment of acne vulgaris.

Two factors of oxidative stress and inflammatory processes are implicated in pathogenesis of acne vulgaris. Silymarin has antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activities. This study was done to evaluate the effect of oral silymarin in the treatment of acne vulgaris compared to doxycycline and also their combination therapy. This randomized controlled trial was performed on 60 patients with acne vulgaris were divided into three groups of 20 patients, including: Silymarin (Group 1), Doxycycline (Group 2), and both compounds (Group 3). The patients' response was monitored every month and the lesions were evaluated using photography and two methods of Global Acne Grading system (GAGS) and Acne Severity Index (ASI). According to the results, the response to silymarin was not significantly different with doxycycline in the GAGS index (p = .260), but was lower in the ASI (p = .021). In this study, the synergistic effects of silymarin and doxycycline combination have been investigated in comparison with doxycycline. Although the improvement was more favorable in combination group, there was no statistically significant difference (p = .9 in ASI and p = .5 in GAGS). The results of our study suggest that although the silymarin monotherapy is not as effective as doxycycline for the treatment of acne vulgaris, it can be a therapeutic option.