RESUMEN
Bone stress injuries (BSIs) are a common orthopedic injury with short-term, and potentially long-term, effects. Training load capacity, influenced by risk factors, plays a critical role in the occurrence of BSIs. Many factors determine how one's body responds to repetitive loads that have the potential to increase the risk of a BSI. As a scientific community, we have identified numerous isolated BSI risk factors. However, we have not adequately analyzed the integrative, holistic, and cumulative nature of the risk factors, which is essential to determine an individual's specific capacity. In this narrative review, we advocate for a personalized approach to monitor training load so that individuals can optimize their health and performance. We define "cumulative risk profile" as a subjective clinical determination of the number of risk factors with thoughtful consideration of their interaction and propose that athletes have their own cumulative risk profile that influences their capacity to withstand specific training loads. In our narrative review, we outline BSI risk factors, discuss the relationship between BSIs and training load, highlight the importance of individualizing training load, and emphasize the use of a holistic assessment as a training load guide.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The high rate of running-related injury may be associated with increased peak braking forces (PBFs) and vertical loading rates. Gait retraining has been suggested by some experts to be an effective method to reduce loading parameters. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether PBF could be decreased following an 8-session gait retraining program among a group of female recreational runners and which self-selected kinematic strategies could achieve this decrease. METHODS: In this exploratory study, 12 female recreational runners with high PBFs (greater than 0.27 body weight) completed an 8-session gait retraining program with real-time biofeedback of braking forces over the course of a half-marathon training program. Baseline and follow-up kinetics and kinematics were analyzed with a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: There was an average reduction of 15% in PBF (-0.04 body weight; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.07, -0.02 body weight; P = .001; effect size, 0.62), accompanied by a 7% increase in step frequency (11.3 steps per minute; 95% CI: 1.8, 20.9 steps per minute; P = .024; effect size, 0.38) and a 6% decrease in step length (-5.5 cm; 95% CI: -9.9, -1.0 cm; P = .020; effect size, 0.40), from baseline to follow-up. CONCLUSION: The gait retraining program significantly reduced the PBF among a group of female recreational runners. This was achieved through a combination of increased step frequency and decreased step length. Furthermore, the modified gait pattern was incorporated into the runners' natural gait pattern by the completion of the program. Based on these results, the outlined gait retraining program should be further investigated to assess whether it may be an effective injury prevention strategy for recreational runners. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03302975). LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prevention, level 4. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(3):136-144. Epub 7 Dec 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.8587.