A Call to Action by the Italian Mesotherapy Society on Scientific Research.

Mesotherapy (local intradermal therapy, LIT) is a technique used to slowly spread drugs in tissues underlying the site of injection to prolong the pharmacological effect with respect to intramuscular injection. Recommendations for proper medical use of this technique have been made for pain medicine and rehabilitation, chronic venous disease, sport medicine, musculoskeletal disorders, several dermatological conditions, skin ageing, and immune-prophylaxis. Although mesotherapy is considered a valid technique, unresolved questions remain, which should be answered to standardize methodology and dosing regimen as well as to define the right indications in clinical practice. New randomized controlled trials are needed to test single products (dose, frequency of administration, efficacy and safety). Even infiltration of substances for dermo-cosmetic purposes must be guided by safety and efficacy tests before being proposed by mesotherapy. In this article, we put forth a preclinical and clinical research plan and a health technology assessment as a call to action by doctors, researchers and scientific societies to aid national health authorities in considering mesotherapy for prevention, treatment and rehabilitation paths.

Mesotherapy: From Historical Notes to Scientific Evidence and Future Prospects.

Intradermal therapy, known as mesotherapy, is a technique used to inject a drug into the surface layer of the skin. In particular, it involves the use of a short needle to deposit the drug in the dermis. The intradermal microdeposit modulates the drug's kinetics, slowing absorption and prolonging the local mechanism of action. It is successfully applied in the treatment of some forms of localized pain syndromes and other local clinical conditions. It could be suggested when a systemic drug-sparing effect is useful, when other therapies have failed (or cannot be used), and when it can synergize with other pharmacological or nonpharmacological therapies. Despite the lack of randomized clinical trials in some fields of application, a general consensus is also reached in nonpharmacological mechanism of action, the technique execution modalities, the scientific rationale to apply it in some indications, and the usefulness of the informed consent. The Italian Mesotherapy Society proposes this position paper to apply intradermal therapy based on scientific evidence and no longer on personal bias.

Non-convulsive status epilepticus in a patient with carbon-monoxide poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy.

The presentation of carbon monoxide poisoning is non-specific and highly variable. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy is used for the treatment of this condition. Various reports show the occurrence of self-limiting seizures after carbon monoxide poisoning and as a consequence of hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Contrary to the seizures, status epilepticus has been rarely observed in these conditions. The exact pathophysiology underlying seizures and status epilepticus associated with carbon monoxide poisoning and hyperbaric oxygen therapy is not really clear, and some elements appear to be common to both conditions. We describe a case of non-convulsive status epilepticus in a patient with carbon monoxide poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen therapy. The mechanism, MRI findings and implications are discussed.

Should the General Practitioner Consider Mesotherapy (Intradermal Therapy) to Manage Localized Pain?

Wide variations in the types of pain and response to analgesic pharmacotherapy mean that a variety of treatment strategies are needed. One approach is mesotherapy (intradermal therapy). This consists of microinjections into the skin and is ideally suited to the management of localized pain. Advantages include increasing the duration of drug activity, reduced risk of adverse events and interactions, and possible synergy with other therapies. Mesotherapy provides general practitioners with another tool for the treatment of local pain. However, it is important to provide patients with full details of the pros and cons of this approach and obtain informed patient consent.

Inhibition of persistent sodium current fraction and voltage-gated L-type calcium current by propofol in cortical neurons: implications for its antiepileptic activity.

PURPOSE: Although it is widely used in clinical practice, the mechanisms of action of 2,6-di-isopropylphenol (propofol) are not completely understood. We examined the electrophysiologic effects of propofol on an in vitro model of epileptic activity obtained from a slice preparation. METHODS: The effects of propofol were tested both on membrane properties and on epileptiform events consisting of long-lasting, paroxysmal depolarization shifts (PDSs) induced by reducing the magnesium concentration from the solution and by adding bicuculline and 4-aminopyridine. These results were integrated with a patch-clamp analysis of Na(+) and high-voltage activated (HVA) calcium (Ca(2+)) currents from isolated cortical neurons. RESULTS: In bicuculline, to avoid any interference by gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA)-A receptors, propofol (3-100 microM) did not cause significant changes in the current-evoked, sodium (Na(+))-dependent action-potential discharge. However, propofol reduced both the duration and the number of spikes of PDSs recorded from cortical neurons. Interestingly, relatively low concentrations of propofol [half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)), 3.9 microM) consistently inhibited the "persistent" fraction of Na(+) currents, whereas even high doses (< or =300 microM) had negligible effects on the "fast" component of Na(+) currents. HVA Ca(2+) currents were significantly reduced by propofol, and the pharmacologic analysis of this effect showed that propofol selectively reduced L-type HVA Ca(2+) currents, without affecting N or P/Q-type channels. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that propofol modulates neuronal excitability by selectively suppressing persistent Na(+) currents and L-type HVA Ca(2+) conductances in cortical neurons. These effects might cooperate with the opening of GABA-A-gated chloride channels, to achieve depression of cortical activity during both anesthesia and status epilepticus.

Vitamin E supplementation in patients with carotid atherosclerosis: reversal of altered oxidative stress status in plasma but not in plaque.

OBJECTIVE: Oxidative stress is believed to play a pivotal role in the initiation and progression of atherosclerosis. We analyzed whether vitamin E supplementation influences oxidative stress in plasma and atherosclerotic plaques of patients with severe atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 16 patients who were candidates for carotid endarterectomy and in 32 age- and sex-matched controls, plasma levels of 7beta-hydroxycholesterol, 7-ketocholesterol, cholesterol, and vitamin E were measured. Patients were randomly allocated to standard treatment with or without 900 mg/d vitamin E. After 6 weeks of treatment, the reported variables were measured in plasma and plaques. The plasma vitamin E/cholesterol ratio was significantly lower in patients than in controls (3.05+/-0.6 versus 6.3+/-1.7 micromol/mmol cholesterol, P<0.001). Plasma 7beta-hydroxycholesterol was significantly higher in patients than in controls (5.0+/-1.04 versus 4.4+/-0.6 ng/mL, P<0.05). Patients who were given vitamin E supplementation showed a significant increase of plasma vitamin E with concomitant decrease of 7beta-hydroxycholesterol. Conversely, no treatment dependence was observed in oxysterol or vitamin E content of plaques. CONCLUSIONS: An imbalance between oxidative stress and antioxidant status is present in patients with advanced atherosclerosis. Vitamin E supplementation improves this imbalance in plasma but not in plaques.

Dopamine selectively reduces GABA(B) transmission onto dopaminergic neurones by an unconventional presynaptic action.

The functioning of midbrain dopaminergic neurones is closely involved in mental processes and movement. In particular the modulation of the inhibitory inputs on these cells might be crucial in controlling firing activity and dopamine (DA) release in the brain. Here, we report a concentration-dependent depressant action of dopamine on the GABA(B) IPSPs intracellularly recorded from dopaminergic neurones. Such effect was observed in spite of the presence of D(1)/D(2) dopamine receptor antagonists. A reduction of the GABA(B) IPSPs was also caused by noradrenaline (norepinephrine) and by L-beta-3,4-dihydroxyphenylalanine (L-DOPA), which is metabolically transformed into DA. The DA-induced depression of the IPSPs was partially antagonised by the alpha2 antagonists yohimbine and phentolamine. DA did not change the postsynaptic effects of the GABA(B) agonist baclofen, suggesting a presynaptic site of action. Furthermore, DA did not modulate the GABA(A)-mediated IPSP. The DA-induced depression of the GABA(B) IPSP occluded the depression produced by serotonin and was not antagonized by serotonin antagonists. The DA- and 5-HT-induced depression of the GABA(B) IPSP persisted when calcium and potassium currents were reduced in to the presynaptic terminals. These results describe an unconventional presynaptic, D(1) and D(2) independent action of DA on the GABA(B) IPSP. This might have a principal role in determining therapeutic/side effects of L-DOPA and antipsychotics and could be also involved in drug abuse.