Impact of alcohol driving-while-impaired license suspension duration on future alcohol-related license events and motor vehicle crash involvement in North Carolina, 2007 to 2016.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: License suspensions are a strategy to address alcohol-impaired driving behavior and recidivism following an alcohol driving while impaired (alcohol-DWI) conviction. Little is known about the specific impacts of conviction-related suspensions on safety outcomes and given recent fluctuations in alcohol-impaired driving behavior, crashes, and suspension trends, updated and focused assessments of this intervention are necessary. This study aimed to 1) examine the association between type of recent alcohol-DWI suspension and having a secondary alcohol-related license outcome and/or future crash event in North Carolina (NC) between 2007 and 2016; and 2) assess potential modification of these associations by race/ethnicity. METHODS: We used linked NC licensing data, NC crash data, and county-level contextual data from a variety of data sources. We compared individuals ages 21 to 64 who sustained initial (1-year) versus repeat (4-year) suspensions for alcohol-related license and crash involvement outcomes. We estimated unadjusted and adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) using Cox proportional hazards models and produced Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival curves using a three-year follow-up period. After observing statistically significant modification by race/ethnicity, we calculated stratified aHRs for each outcome (Black and White subgroups only, as other subgroups had low numbers of outcomes). RESULTS: 122,002 individuals sustained at least one alcohol-DWI conviction suspension (117,244 initial, 4,758 repeat). Adjusted KM survival curves indicated that within three years of the index suspension, the predicted risks of having a license outcome and crash outcome were about 8 % and 15 %, respectively, among individuals with an initial suspension and 5 % and 10 %, respectively, among individuals with a repeat suspension. After adjusting for potential confounding, we found that compared to those with an initial suspension, those with repeat suspensions had a lower incidence of future license (aHR: 0.49; 95 % CI: 0.42, 0.57) and crash outcomes (aHR: 0.67; 95 % CI: 0.60, 0.75). Among Black individuals, license outcome incidence was 162 % lower among repeat versus initial index suspension groups (aHR: 0.38; 95 % CI: 0.26, 0.55), while for White individuals, the incidence was 87 % lower (aHR: 0.54; 95 % CI: 0.45, 0.64). Similarly, crash incidence for repeat versus initial suspensions among Black individuals was 56 % lower (aHR: 0.64; 95 % CI: 0.50, 0.83), while only 39 % lower among White individuals (aHR: 0.72; 95 % CI: 0.63, 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Decreased incidence of both license and crash outcomes were observed among repeat versus initial index suspensions. The magnitude of these differences varied by race/ethnicity, with larger decreases in incidence among Black compared to White individuals. Future research should examine the underlying mechanisms leading to alcohol-impaired driving behavior, convictions, recidivism, and crashes from a holistic social-ecological perspective so that interventions are designed to both improve road safety and maximize other critical public health outcomes, such as access to essential needs and services (e.g., healthcare and employment).

Racial and ethnic disparities in motor vehicle crash-related outcomes in North Carolina surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic.

Long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on racial and ethnic disparities in motor vehicle crash (MVC) injuries and death are poorly understood. This study aimed to characterize trends and investigate the heterogeneity of MVC-related disparities in North Carolina across several data sources. Crash reports, emergency department visit records, and death certificates from 2018 to 2021 were used to calculate monthly population-rates of MVC-related public health outcomes. We estimated trendlines using joinpoint regression and compared outcomes across racial and ethnic classifications. MVC and MVC-related injury rates declined in conjunction with NC's stay-at-home order, while rates of severe outcomes remained unimpacted. By December 2021 rates of MVC-related outcomes met or exceeded pre-pandemic levels, with the highest rates observed among non-Hispanic Black individuals. Racial and ethnic disparities in MVC-related outcomes remained prevalent throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. These results highlight the importance of a holistic approach to traffic injury surveillance when assessing the impact of MVCs.

Simulating congestion pricing policy impacts on pedestrian safety using a system dynamics approach.

Research on congestion pricing policy (CPP) impacts has generally focused on the economic and congestion-related benefits of CPPs. Few studies have examined safety effects and the interrelated factors that produce safety outcomes for vulnerable road users. We built a novel system dynamics simulation model to explore the potential mechanisms producing pedestrian injuries over time and the impacts of a CPP (and related interventions) on this trend. We found that pedestrian injury trends varied based on important decisions related to how the CPP is designed, including investments in potential safety-related supports for pedestrians. Infrastructure improvements and speed management interventions could help cities achieve both congestion-relieving goals while also improving safety. Additionally, certain CPP configurations (e.g., additional charges on for-hire vehicles) could further reduce daily vehicle trips and congestion but might lead to unintended negative safety consequences of greater pedestrian injuries. This is the first model to provide a holistic and endogenous look at how interconnected processes affecting congestion and CPP impacts also affect vulnerable road user safety. The use of system dynamics models can facilitate a holistic inspection of potential intended and unintended effects across a range of outcomes, prior to policy implementation.

Preferred modes of travel among older adults: what factors affect the choice to walk instead of drive?

INTRODUCTION: There are many factors that influence older adults' travel choices. This paper explores the associations between mode of travel choice for a short trip and older adults' personal characteristics. METHODS: This study included 406 drivers over the age of 64 who were enrolled in a large integrated health plan in the United States between 1991 and 2001. Bivariate analyses and generalized linear modeling were used to examine associations between choosing to walk or drive and respondents' self-reported general health, physical and functional abilities, and confidence in walking and driving. RESULTS: Having more confidence in their ability to walk versus drive increased an older adult's likelihood of walking to make a short trip by about 20% (PR=1.22; 95% CI: 1.06-1.40), and walking for exercise increased the likelihood by about 50% (PR=1.53; 95% CI=1.22-1.91). Reporting fair or poor health decreased the likelihood of walking, as did cutting down on the amount of driving due to a physical problem. DISCUSSION: Factors affecting a person's decision to walk for exercise may not be the same as those that influence their decision to walk as a mode of travel. It is important to understand the barriers to walking for exercise and walking for travel to develop strategies to help older adults meet both their exercise and mobility needs. IMPACT ON INDUSTRY: Increasing walking over driving among older adults may require programs that increase confidence in walking and encourage walking for exercise.