A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Crossover Study to Evaluate Postprandial Glucometabolic Effects of Mulberry Leaf Extract, Vitamin D, Chromium, and Fiber in People with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Reducing postprandial (PP) hyperglycemia and PP glucose excursions is important for overall glycemic management. Although most therapeutic lifestyle interventions that reduce caloric intake would affect this, there is no particular nutritional intervention favored. METHODS: We evaluated the effects of a novel natural food adjuvant combining mulberry leaf extract (MLE) with other bioactive ingredients, in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) originating from Asia, on improving PP glucometabolic response in a randomized controlled exploratory crossover, two-center study (USA, Singapore). A 2-g blend of 250 mg MLE [containing 12.5 mg of 1-deoxynojirimycin (DNJ)], fiber (1.75 g), vitamin D3 (0.75 µg), and chromium (75 µg), compared with a similar blend without the MLE, was sprinkled over a 350-kcal breakfast meal (55.4 g carbs) and PP blood glucose (primary exploratory endpoint), insulin, and incretin hormones (GLP-1, GIP) were evaluated in blood samples over 3 h. Changes in incremental areas under the concentration curve (iAUC) and maximum concentrations (Cmax) were compared. RESULTS: Thirty individuals (12 women, mean age 59 years, HbA1c 7.1%, BMI 26.5 kg/m2) were enrolled and the MLE-based blend relative to the blend without MLE significantly reduced glucose iAUC at 1 h (- 20%, p < 0.0001), 2 h (- 17%, p = 0.0001), and 3 h (- 15%, p = 0.0032) and Cmax [mean (95% CI) difference - 0.8 (- 1.2, - 0.3) mmol/L, p = 0.0006]. A statistically significant reduction in 1 h insulin iAUC (- 24%, p = 0.0236) was observed, but this reduction was no longer present at either 2 h or 3 h. No difference in GLP-1 was seen, but GIP response (iAUC and Cmax) was less with the MLE-based blend. CONCLUSIONS: The observation of a significant glucose reduction paralleled with a significant lower insulin response supports a reduced gastrointestinal glucose absorption. These results support the use of a 2-g natural blend of MLE, fiber, vitamin D, and chromium in T2D as a convenient dietary adjuvant to improve PP glucometabolic response. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier NCT04877366.

It is generally accepted that addressing lifestyle factors represents the initial step for treatment of type 2 diabetes. This includes an evaluation of how to optimize physical exercise and diet. However, although most diets that reduce caloric intake would affect sugar levels, there is no particular nutritional intervention favored, and choices depend on factors such as cost, preference, availabilities, and scientific evidence. A multiingredient food adjuvant blend for support of blood sugar levels combined mulberry leaf extract with fiber, vitamin D, and chromium, and was developed with the intended use to be sprinkled on and consumed with a meal. In this study involving 30 people with type 2 diabetes (mean age 59 years, glycated hemoglobin 7.1%, body mass index 26.5 kg/m²) originating from Asia, a 2-g blend of these ingredients was sprinkled over a 350-kcal breakfast meal rich in carbohydrates (55.4 g) and compared to a similar blend without the MLE. Blood sugar spikes following the meal were reduced by 15­20% over an observation period of 3 h. Thus, such a mulberry leaf extract-based blend, which also is a source of fiber, vitamin D, and chromium, may represent a convenient dietary support to improve sugar levels after a meal.

Safety, Tolerability, and Physiological Effects of AXA1665, a Novel Composition of Amino Acids, in Subjects With Child-Pugh A and B Cirrhosis.

INTRODUCTION: AXA1665 is a novel investigational amino acid (AA) composition specifically designed to impact AA imbalance, ammoniagenesis, and dysregulated anabolic activity associated with cirrhosis. METHODS: This 2-part study examined AXA1665 effects on safety, tolerability, and hepatic/muscle physiology in subjects with Child-Pugh A and B cirrhosis. Part 1 established plasma ammonia and AA concentration baselines with a standardized protein supplement. Part 2 included two 15-day domiciled periods separated by a 14-day washout. In period 1, subjects were randomly distributed to 2 groups: AXA1665 14.7 g t.i.d. (group 1) or control t.i.d. (group 2). In period 2, subjects from group 1 crossed over to control and those in group 2 crossed over to AXA1665 4.9 g t.i.d. All subjects were maintained on standard of care (standardized meals; 30-minute daily, supervised, mandatory physical activity; and daily late-evening snack). RESULTS: In parts 1 and 2, 23 and 17 participants were enrolled, respectively. Dose-dependent increases were observed in plasma concentrations of AXA1665-constituent AAs. Fasted branched-chain AA-to-aromatic AA and valine-to-phenylalanine ratios were both increased (AXA1665 14.7 g t.i.d. control-adjusted change: 44.3% ± 2.7% and 47.2% ± 3.9%, respectively; P < 0.0001). Despite provision of additional nitrogen, mean fasted plasma ammonia concentration at day 15 numerically decreased (-21.1% in AXA1665 14.7 g t.i.d. vs -3.8% in control; P > 0.05). AXA1665 14.7 g t.i.d. produced a leaner body composition and significantly decreased Liver Frailty Index at day 15 vs control (-0.70 ± 0.15 vs -0.14 ± 0.17; P < 0.05). AXA1665 was safe and well tolerated. DISCUSSION: AXA1665 has potential to mitigate core metabolic derangements associated with cirrhosis.

Hypertension management: rationale for triple therapy based on mechanisms of action.

An estimated 25% of patients will require 3 antihypertensive agents to achieve blood pressure (BP) control; combination therapy is thus an important strategy in hypertension treatment. This review discusses the triple-therapy combination of an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) or direct renin antagonist (DRI) with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) and a diuretic, with a focus on mechanisms of action. Multiple physiologic pathways contribute to hypertension. Combining antihypertensive agents not only better targets the underlying pathways, but also helps blunt compensatory responses that may be triggered by single-agent therapy. DRIs and ARBs target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at the initial and final steps, respectively, and both classes lower BP by reducing the effects of angiotensin-2; however, ARBs may trigger a compensatory increase in renin activity. Dihydropyridine CCBs target L-type calcium channels and lower BP through potent vasodilation, but can trigger compensatory activation of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) and RAAS. Thiazide diuretics lower BP initially through sodium depletion and plasma volume reduction, followed by total peripheral resistance reduction, but can also trigger compensatory activation of the SNS and RAAS. The combination of an agent targeting the RAAS with a CCB and diuretic is rational, and triple combinations of valsartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide, olmesartan/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide, and aliskiren/amlodipine/hydrochlorothiazide have demonstrated greater effectiveness compared with their respective dual-component combinations. In addition, single-pill, fixed-dose combinations can address barriers to BP control including clinical inertia and poor adherence. Fixed-dose antihypertensive combination products capitalize on complementary mechanisms of action and have been shown to result in improved BP control.

Long-term blood pressure control: what can we do?

There are unique problems associated with the long-term control of blood pressure (BP) in patients with hypertension. Many of these problems warrant specific discussion for the primary care physician. Up to one-third of high-risk patients are estimated to have uncontrolled hypertension. Although long-term control is essential to avoid complications of cardiovascular disease, such as myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure, and kidney disease, it can become troublesome because of challenges with patient compliance and adherence to medication regimens. This may be due to low tolerability profiles, complicated regimens, or prohibitive costs. Trials have shown that a combination approach may reduce side effects with complementary therapies such as a calcium channel blocker (CCB)/angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) combination. Combination therapy can be used in any patient group not responsive to monotherapy, or who remain 20 mm Hg higher than their BP goal. This method may achieve the goal of reaching target BP sooner as a first-line approach and, in a fixed-dose combination, may be a more economic choice as well as a simpler regimen for the patient. Together with supportive measures, CCB/ARB combinations are a compelling alternative for the long-term treatment of hypertension.

Complementary mechanisms of angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers in managing hypertension.

Hypertension affects approximately 73 million individuals in the United States. Clinical studies have shown that antihypertensive therapy can reduce blood pressure (BP) and the risk of cardiovascular events. However, the majority of patients with hypertension do not achieve the recommended BP goal of < 140/90 mm Hg (or < 130/80 mm Hg for patients with diabetes) with antihypertensive monotherapy, and require therapy with 2 or more antihypertensive agents. Combination therapy utilizes antihypertensive agents from different drug classes, which act via distinct pharmacologic mechanisms to improve overall efficacy and tolerability. Although combination therapy is superior to monotherapy in achieving BP goals across the entire spectrum of hypertension, the proportion of patients achieving the recommended BP goal can be further improved by the use of new antihypertensive drug combinations. The beneficial antihypertensive characteristics of both angiotensin receptor blockers and calcium channel blockers suggest that combining these classes may result in a highly efficacious antihypertensive therapy with regard to both activity and safety when used as a fixed-dose combination. In particular, a fixed-dose combination of olmesartan medoxomil plus amlodipine besylate has been demonstrated to be an efficacious antihypertensive combination due in part to the benefits associated with each of these agents within their respective drug classes.

The antihypertensive efficacy and safety of a chronotherapeutic formulation of propranolol in patients with hypertension.

This study evaluated the antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of a chronotherapeutic formulation of propranolol designed for nighttime dosing (propranolol controlled release [CR]). A total of 434 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension were randomized to placebo or to one of four doses of propranolol CR (80, 120, 160, or 640 mg/d). At baseline, the mean morning blood pressures were similar in each treatment group and averaged 152/101 mm Hg. After 8 weeks of treatment, morning diastolic blood pressure, the primary efficacy measurement, was significantly reduced from baseline in placebo (-6.98 mm Hg) and all propranolol groups (p<0.001). The decreases ranged from 10.1 mm Hg in the 80-mg/d group to 11.0 mm Hg in the 120-mg/d group and were significantly larger than placebo in the 120-, 160-, and 640-mg/d groups (p<0.05). Blood pressure measured in the evening (trough) demonstrated similar antihypertensive efficacy. Heart rate and rate-pressure product were reduced in a dose-related manner by propranolol CR. The formulation was well tolerated with only fatigue and dizziness being reported more frequently than in the placebo group. Propranolol CR is an effective antihypertensive formulation that may reduce blood pressure during the morning period of maximum cardiovascular risk.

Low Dose Combination Therapy vs. High Dose Monotherapy in the Management of Hypertension.

A common approach to the management of hypertension suggests the use of an initial drug and the addition of a second agent if goal blood pressures (BPs) are not achieved. The Sixth Report of the Joint National Committee (JNC VI) suggests that the use of low dose combination therapy may be an appropriate alternative to initial treatment. In this prospective, randomized, open label, blinded end point (PROBE) study, following a 2 week single blind placebo washout period, qualified patients were started on a calcium channel blocker, felodipine 5 mg for 2 weeks. Patients who were nonresponders (DBP equals 90 mm Hg) were randomized to either felodipine 10 mg (n equals 17, mean age 52.4, 12 males), an ACE inhibitor, enalapril 5 mg/felodipine 5 mg (n equals 20 mean, mean age 52.1, 13 males), or another ACE inhibitor, benazepril 10 mg/amlodipine 5 mg (n equals 18, mean age 53.9, 15 males) for an additional 6 weeks. Ambulatory BP monitoring was performed at the end of the single blind placebo washout period and again at the end of the study. All three treatment groups had significant reductions in mean 24 hour systolic and diastolic BP compared to baseline. The reduction in mean 24 hour systolic and diastolic BPs in the benazepril/amlodipine treated patients (-17.2/-9.7 mm Hg) was significantly greater (p equals 0.05) than in the felodipine 10 mg treated patients (-11.9/-6.4 mm Hg) and was also numerically but not statistically significantly greater than in the enalapril/felodipine treated patients (-14.2/-8.2 mm Hg). Similar differences were seen when assessing daytime BP (06:00-21:59) and nighttime BP (10:00-05:59). The reductions in morning systolic and diastolic BP (6 am-noon) in the benazepril/amlodipine treated patients (-18.6/-10.7 mm Hg) were numerically but not statistically significantly greater than the enalapril/felodipine treated patients (-13.6/-7.5 mm Hg) and the felodipine 10 mg treated patients (-14.9/-8.3 mm Hg). The data from this study suggests that using low dose combination therapy in patients who are nonresponders to first line monotherapy with a calcium channel blocker provides greater blood pressure control than up titration to higher dose monotherapy. Low dose combination therapy may therefore be an important early alternative to up titration of monotherapy in patients who are nonresponders. These data confirm other observations with combination therapy with à -blockers/ diuretics, ACE inhibitors/diuretics, and angiotensin II (AII) receptor blockers/diuretics. (c)1999 by Le Jacq Communications, Inc.