Immunological effects of heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy can be augmented by thymosin α1.

BACKGROUND: Peritoneal metastases of colorectal carcinoma origin (PM-CRC) are treated by cytoreductive surgery and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC). However, the majority of patients recur, calling for novel treatments. We explored the immunogenic changes induced by HIPEC and the possibility to use thymosin α1 (Tα1) as an immune-stimulatory agent. METHODS: We used an experimental murine model of PM-CRC combined with mitomycin (MMC)-based HIPEC. We determined immune cell infiltration into tumor metastases after HIPEC administration by means of immunohistochemistry, and determined immunogenic cell death signals in tumor cells by real-time polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS: Mice with PM-CRC treated by HIPEC had increased overall survival (OS) compared to sham-treated mice (median OS 22.8 vs 18.9 days, respectively; P < 0.001). HIPEC induced increased infiltration of CD4+, CD8+, CD68 + and CD20 + cells into omental and visceral metastases at a magnitude of 40-100 %. We searched for potential immune signals induced by HIPEC by determining its effects on known immunogenic cell death proteins (heat-shock protein [HSP]-70, HSP-90 and calreticulin). HIPEC significantly increased HSP-90 mRNA expression (2.37 ± 1.5 vs 1-fold change, P < 0.05). The OS of Tα1 treated mice significantly improved compared to HIPEC-treated mice (16.3 ± 0.8 vs 14.1 ± 0.6 days, respectively, P = 0.02) and vs sham (11.8 ± 0.8 days, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC induced immunogenic changes that led to increased immune cell infiltration. These changes were further augmented by Tα1 treatment. Future studies aimed at optimizing Tα1 treatment should focus upon the immune response it evokes.

PD-1 Blockade Combined with Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Improves Outcome in Experimental Peritoneal Metastases from Colonic Origin in a Murine Model.

BACKGROUND: Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) was shown to induce immunogenicity of peritoneal metastases from colorectal cancer (PM-CRC) by induction of immunogenic cell death. We aimed to explore whether the addition of a checkpoint inhibitor would augment the effect of HIPEC in an experimental murine model of PM-CRC. METHODS: PM-CRC was established in C57BL mice by intraperitoneal inoculation of MC38 colon cancer cells. HIPEC was administered using the closed technique with mitomycin C (MMC). Clinical and immunological parameters were compared between animals treated with HIPEC alone and those treated with HIPEC + anti-programmed death receptor-1 (aPD-1). RESULTS: MMC-based HIPEC increased the overall survival of animals compared with sham-treated animals (22.8; 95% confidence interval [CI] 21.14-24.53 vs. 18.9 days; 95% CI 17.6-20.3, p < 0.001). The extent of peritoneal disease as measured by the modified peritoneal carcinomatosis index was also reduced by HIPEC. This clinical benefit was accompanied by increased infiltration of CD8+, CD68+, and CD20+ cells into tumor metastases in HIPEC-treated animals compared with sham-treated animals. We identified heat shock protein (HSP) 90 as a potential immunogenic cell death protein whose expression is increased under HIPEC conditions (fold change: 2.37 ± 1.5 vs. 1 without HIPEC, p < 0.05). Combined HIPEC + PD-1 treatment ameliorated survival compared with HIPEC alone and sham treatment (24.66; 95% CI 20.13-29.2 vs. 19; 95% CI 15.85-22.14 and 14.33 days; 95% CI 9.6-19.04, respectively; p = 0.008). This clinical effect was accompanied by increased CD8+ tumor infiltration. CONCLUSIONS: HIPEC induced the expression of immunogenic cell death signals that can support an anti-tumor immune response. This response can be further exploited by a checkpoint inhibitor.

Long-term outcomes of elderly patients with peritoneal metastases of colorectal origin after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy.

INTRODUCTION: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) were reportedly safe for the elderly. However, long-term survival data in this subgroup of patients are scarce. Our aim was to evaluate the peri-operative and long-term outcomes of CRS + HIPEC in colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) in patients ≥70 years of age. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed our combined institutional databases for patients who underwent CRS + HIPEC for CRC-PM. Clinical and pathological characteristics, as well as overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were compared between the groups. Tumor extent was measured by the peritoneal carcinomatosis index (PCI) and completeness of cytoreduction by the CCR score. Major morbidity was defined according to Clavien-Dindo classification. RESULTS: The dataset of 159 patients included 33 elderly and 126 non-elderly patients. Clinical characteristics between the groups differed only in medical comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index 10 vs. 7, P < 0.001) and delivery of post-HIPEC adjuvant treatment (12.5% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.004). Overall PCI and CCR0 rates were similar between the groups, as were length of stay and major morbidity and mortality rates. Long-term outcomes in the elderly group were lower than those of the non-elderly (median OS: 21.8 vs. 40.5 months, P < 0.001; median PFS: 6 vs. 8 months, P = 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: CRS + HIPEC in selected elderly patients can be safe in terms of postoperative morbidity and mortality. However, despite the same surgical extents and radicality, their long-term outcomes are inferior, possibly due to under-usage of systemic chemotherapy.

Thymosin alpha 1 as an adjuvant to hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in an experimental model of peritoneal metastases from colonic carcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Heated intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) is currently implemented in the treatment of peritoneal metastases from colorectal carcinoma (PM-CRC) origin. However, recurrence is common and the effectiveness of HIPEC has been questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of thymosin alpha 1 (Tα1), an immunomodulatory molecule, as an adjuvant to HIPEC treatment. METHODS: We developed an experimental model of HIPEC by the induction of PM-CRC in C57BL mice and intra-abdominal perfusion of mitomycin C (MMC). Mice were treated with Tα1 at 0.6 mg/kg for 5 days after HIPEC. Clinical and immunological parameters were compared between HIPEC and HIPEC + Tα1 groups. RESULTS: Treatment with Tα1 increased overall survival of mice compared to HIPEC treatment alone and sham-treated animals (16.1 ± 0.8 vs. 14.1 ± 0.6 and 11.8 ± 0.8, respectively, p = 0.02). Tα1 had no direct anti-tumor effect, as seen by lack of inhibition of tumor cell proliferation. Tα1 treatment induced a T helper (Th) 1 immune response in tumor metastases as evidenced by a significant increase of the Th1-specific markers IFN-γ and T-bet (1.21 ± 0.3 vs. 0.52 ± 0.08, p < 0.05; 0.88 ± 0.04 vs. 0.64 ± 0.14, p < 0.05, respectively). This Th1 skew was accompanied by increased CD8+ infiltration into omental and visceral metastases by Tα1 treatment compared to sham and HIPEC-treated animals (21.24 ± 2.16 vs. 10.45 ± 0.89 and 7.7 ± 1.3, p < 0.001; 14.12 ± 1.54 vs. 12.12 ± 0.01 and 6.64 ± 0.87, p < 0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Tα1 augments the effect of HIPEC by the induction of a Th1 anti-tumor immune response. Further experiments should evaluate Tα1 and other novel immunomodulators in order to exploit the immunological opportunities created by HIPEC.

Lymph Node Metastases from Visceral Peritoneal Colorectal Metastases are Associated with Systemic Recurrence.

BACKGROUND: Visceral peritoneal colorectal metastases (VPCMs) may further metastasize to lymph nodes that drain those organs. The rate of lymph node metastases (LNMs) from VPCMs and their clinical and prognostic significance are unknown. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed the authors' institutional databases of 160 patients with peritoneal colorectal metastases who underwent cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Patients with LNM-VPCM (n = 12) were identified by pathologic reports, and both their short- and long-term outcomes were compared with those of patients without LNM-VPCM. RESULTS: The clinical presentation and primary tumor pathologic characteristics did not differ between the two groups. The patients with LNM-VPCM had a higher tumor burden (measured by the peritoneal carcinomatosis index [PCI]) and visible remnant disease compared with those who had no LNM-VPI (10 vs 5.5 [p = 0.03] vs 33.3% vs 6.8% [p = 0.007], respectively). The postoperative outcomes also were comparable. The patients with LNM-VPCM had a shorter overall survival (OS) than those without LNM-VPCM (median OS, 22.5 months; 95% confidence interval [CI], 15.1-29.9 months vs 40.1 months; 95% CI, 38.1-42 months; p = 0.02). However, only tumor grade and PCI were predictors of OS in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR], 2.33 [p = 0.001]; 1.77 [p = 0.03], respectively). The study showed that LNM-VPCM was associated with systemic but not peritoneal recurrence compared with non-LNM-VPCM (81.8% vs 51.6% for systemic recurrence, respectively; p = 0.05). CONCLUSION: The small distinct group of patients defined by LNM-VPCM were prone to systemic recurrence. Given its correlation with systemic recurrence, LNM-VPCM may indicate the need for adjuvant treatment.