Effects of Ferric Citrate in Patients with Nondialysis-Dependent CKD and Iron Deficiency Anemia.

Iron deficiency anemia is common and consequential in nondialysis-dependent CKD (NDD-CKD). Efficacy and tolerability of conventional oral iron supplements are mixed; intravenous iron administration associates with finite but important risks. We conducted a randomized double-blind clinical trial in adults with NDD-CKD and iron deficiency anemia to compare the safety and efficacy of oral ferric citrate (n=117) and placebo (n=115). The primary end point was the proportion of patients who achieved a ≥1.0 g/dl increase in hemoglobin at any time during a 16-week randomized period. Patients who completed the 16-week period could also participate in an 8-week open-label extension period. Significantly more patients randomized to ferric citrate achieved the primary end point (61 [52.1%] versus 22 [19.1%] with placebo; P<0.001). All secondary end points reached statistical significance in the ferric citrate group, including the mean relative change in hemoglobin (0.84 g/dl; 95% confidence interval, 0.58 to 1.10 g/dl; P<0.001) and the proportion of patients who achieved a sustained increase in hemoglobin (≥0.75 g/dl over any 4-week period during the randomized trial; 57 [48.7%] versus 17 [14.8%] with placebo; P<0.001). Rates of serious adverse events were similar in the ferric citrate (12.0%) and placebo groups (11.2%). Gastrointestinal disorders were the most common adverse events, with diarrhea reported in 24 (20.5%) and 19 (16.4%) and constipation in 22 (18.8%) and 15 (12.9%) patients treated with ferric citrate and placebo, respectively. Overall, in patients with NDD-CKD, we found oral ferric citrate to be a safe and efficacious treatment for iron deficiency anemia.

Sevelamer carbonate lowers serum phosphorus effectively in haemodialysis patients: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, dose-titration study.

BACKGROUND: Hyperphosphataemia in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with adverse outcomes, including vascular calcification and higher mortality rates. While phosphate lowering is an integral aspect of CKD management, the efficacy and safety of phosphate binders in a contemporary cohort of Chinese haemodialysis patients (who have different genetics and dietary patterns than other populations) has not been previously described. Moreover, sparse data are available on strategies for optimal dose titration when transitioning from a calcium-based to a polymer-based phosphate binder. METHODS: This randomized, double-blind, dose-titration study compared sevelamer carbonate (starting dose 800 mg three times daily) with placebo over 8 weeks' duration in Chinese CKD patients on haemodialysis. Patients were required to be using calcium-based binders prior to study start. RESULTS: In all, 205 patients were randomized (sevelamer, n = 135; placebo, n = 70); mean age was 48.6 years, 61% were male and the mean time on dialysis was 4.4 years. The mean serum phosphorus decreased significantly in patients treated with sevelamer carbonate [change -0.69 ± 0.64 mmol/L (-2.14 ± 1.98 mg/dL)] but remained persistently elevated with placebo [change -0.06 ± 0.57 mmol/L (-0.19 ± 1.76 mg/dL)] (P < 0.0001). When compared with placebo, sevelamer carbonate treatment resulted in statistically significant greater mean reductions from baseline in serum total (-17.1 versus -3.3%) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (-33.5 versus-7.6%) (P < 0.0001 for both). Sevelamer carbonate was well tolerated with 96% adherence compared with 97% adherence in the placebo arm. Overall, adverse events experienced by patients in the sevelamer carbonate and placebo treatment groups were similar and consistent with their underlying renal disease. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that hyperphosphataemia developed quickly following the cessation of phosphate binders and remained persistently elevated in end-stage CKD in the placebo-treated group. Gradually titrating up sevelamer carbonate from an initial dose of 2.4 g/day to an average daily dose of 7.1 ± 2.5 g/day was well tolerated, safe and efficacious in contemporary Chinese haemodialysis patients.

Accuracy and variability of equations to estimate glomerular filtration rates in renal transplant patients receiving sirolimus and/or calcineurin inhibitor immunosuppression.

Measured glomerular filtration rates (mGFRs) were obtained by (99)mTc-DPTA, (125)I-iothalamate, iohexol, (51)Cr-EDTA, non-radiolabeled iothalamate, or inulin clearance from centers agreeing to perform mGFR in six completed and one ongoing Wyeth Research multicenter trials evaluating sirolimus (SRL) in regimens with or without a calcineurin inhibitor (CNI). Estimated GFRs (eGFRs) were calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault (eGFR(CG)), Nankivell (eGFR(NK)), and simplified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (eGFR(MDRD)) equations. Bias, precision, and accuracy for each of these equations were estimated by tertiles and by regimen. For the Rapamune Maintenance Regimen (RMR) trial, eGFR outcomes were also compared between treatments {[SRL-cyclosporine (CsA) versus SRL]} using the three eGFR formulas. In the lowest mGFR tertile (6-40 ml/min), eGFR(MDRD) gave the best accuracy with the least bias whereas eGFR(NK) and eGFR(CG) performed better in the highest mGFR tertile (58-139 ml/min). At 24 months in the RMR study, mean differences in eGFR between treatments were 13.6, 14.2, and 13.5 ml/min/1.73 m(2) for eGFR(CG), eGFR(NK), and eGFR(MDRD), respectively, favoring CsA withdrawal (P-values for all <0.001). The accuracy of the three eGFR equations was affected by mGFR range but not by immunosuppressive regimens utilizing SRL, SRL-CNI or CNI-based therapy.