Monotherapy and combination therapy with acitretin for mycosis fungoides: results of a retrospective, multicentre study.

BACKGROUND: Retinoids have long been used in the treatment of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas. However, data on acitretin use for mycosis fungoides (MF) are very limited. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate treatment outcomes of acitretin in patients with MF attending three academic referral centres in different regions of Greece. METHODS: Data on effectiveness, safety and drug survival of acitretin as monotherapy or as adjuvant regimen were collected in a multicentre, register-based, retrospective study. RESULTS: Overall, 128 patients (64.8% male; mean age at MF diagnosis 59.7 years) were included. Folliculotropic MF was present in 24 (18.8%) cases. Most patients (n = 118; 92.2%) had early-stage disease (≤IIA) at acitretin initiation. In all, 28 (21.9%) patients received acitretin monotherapy, while 100 (78.1%) subjects on acitretin concomitantly received phototherapy (n = 65; 50.8%) or topical steroids (n = 27; 21.1%). Acitretin was given as a first-line agent in 73 (57%) cases. A 77.3% overall response rate was noted: 44.5% and 32.8% for complete and partial responses, respectively. Acitretin was more effective as first-line than as a subsequent agent (P = 0.008). A trend towards better response was observed in the combination arm compared to patients receiving acitretin alone (P = 0.056). Median time to best response was 6.9 months (IQR 4.4-9.4); median duration of response was 23.7 months (IQR 11.9-35.4). Overall, the mean length of all treatment patterns was 569 days (SD 718.8). Therapy was discontinued in 5 (3.9%) cases due to drug intolerance. Adverse effects were recorded in 62 (48.4%) cases with dyslipidaemia (n = 31; 24.2%), xerosis (n = 24; 18.6%) and hair loss (n = 10; 7.8%) being the most commonly recorded. CONCLUSIONS: Acitretin, either alone or as adjuvant, showed a stable long-term effectiveness in this cohort, especially when used in the first-line setting. This RAR-selective agonist may serve as an attractive option for treatment of MF and should be further evaluated.

Global patterns of care in advanced stage mycosis fungoides/Sezary syndrome: a multicenter retrospective follow-up study from the Cutaneous Lymphoma International Consortium.

BACKGROUND: Advanced-stage mycosis fungoides (MF)/Sézary syndrome (SS) patients are weighted by an unfavorable prognosis and share an unmet clinical need of effective treatments. International guidelines are available detailing treatment options for the different stages but without recommending treatments in any particular order due to lack of comparative trials. The aims of this second CLIC study were to retrospectively analyze the pattern of care worldwide for advanced-stage MF/SS patients, the distribution of treatments according to geographical areas (USA versus non-USA), and whether the heterogeneity of approaches has potential impact on survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 853 patients from 21 specialist centers (14 European, 4 USA, 1 each Australian, Brazilian, and Japanese). RESULTS: Heterogeneity of treatment approaches was found, with up to 24 different modalities or combinations used as first-line and 36% of patients receiving four or more treatments. Stage IIB disease was most frequently treated by total-skin-electron-beam radiotherapy, bexarotene and gemcitabine; erythrodermic and SS patients by extracorporeal photochemotherapy, and stage IVA2 by polychemotherapy. Significant differences were found between USA and non-USA centers, with bexarotene, photopheresis and histone deacetylase inhibitors most frequently prescribed for first-line treatment in USA while phototherapy, interferon, chlorambucil and gemcitabine in non-USA centers. These differences did not significantly impact on survival. However, when considering death and therapy change as competing risk events and the impact of first treatment line on both events, both monochemotherapy (SHR = 2.07) and polychemotherapy (SHR = 1.69) showed elevated relative risks. CONCLUSION: This large multicenter retrospective study shows that there exist a large treatment heterogeneity in advanced MF/SS and differences between USA and non-USA centers but these were not related to survival, while our data reveal that chemotherapy as first treatment is associated with a higher risk of death and/or change of therapy and thus other therapeutic options should be preferable as first treatment approach.

PUVA plus interferon α2b in the treatment of advanced or refractory to PUVA early stage mycosis fungoides: a case series.

BACKGROUND: The combination of PUVA with variable doses of systemically administered interferon α2b (IFN-α2b) reduces the number of PUVA treatments and the dose of IFN-α2b required to produce remission in all mycosis fungoides (MF) stages. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy of the combination of PUVA and IFN-α2b in patients with late stage or refractory to treatment early stage MF. METHODS: The combination of PUVA three times weekly and IFN-α2b 2-5 MU three times weekly was retrospectively reviewed in 22 patients. Kaplan-Meyer method and log-rank test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were analysed, seven with refractory to PUVA early stage MF, seven with tumour stage, five with erythrodermic MF and three with Sézary syndrome (SS). The overall response rate (complete or partial response) was 68%, including 10 complete responses (CR) (45%) and five partial responses (PR) (23%). Significantly, more patients of the early stage group achieved CR compared with the advanced stage group (86% vs. 27%, P=0.03). Within the advanced stage group, CR rates were 14% vs. 37% in stage IIB and III/SS patients respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant. Patients with early stage disease had a 2-year PFS of 100% vs. 27% for the advanced stage group (P<0.001). Sustained remissions (>2 years) were achieved in five out of six complete responders in the early stage group of patients. CONCLUSION: This combination of IFN-α2b and PUVA is an effective and safe treatment for refractory to treatment early stage MF patients as well as treatment-naïve advanced stage patients. Its efficacy is more pronounced in the former patient group.