Rationalizing Secondary Pharmacology Screening Using Human Genetic and Pharmacological Evidence.

Safety-related drug failures remain a major challenge for the pharmaceutical industry. One approach to ensuring drug safety involves assessing small molecule drug specificity by examining the ability of a drug candidate to interact with a panel of "off-target" proteins, referred to as secondary pharmacology screening. Information from human genetics and pharmacology can be used to select proteins associated with adverse effects for such screening. In an analysis of marketed drugs, we found a clear relationship between the genetic and pharmacological phenotypes of a drug's off-target proteins and the observed drug side effects. In addition to using this phenotypic information for the selection of secondary pharmacology screens, we also show that it can be used to help identify drug off-target protein interactions responsible for drug-related adverse events. We anticipate that this phenotype-driven approach to secondary pharmacology screening will help to reduce safety-related drug failures due to drug off-target protein interactions.

Monitoring the accumulation of fluorescently labeled phospholipids in cell cultures provides an accurate screen for drugs that induce phospholipidosis.

A large number of cationic amphiphilic drugs (CADs) are known to cause phospholipidosis (PLD) in vivo. In the present study, we have built upon our previous findings to further qualify the use of a fluorescently labeled phospholipid-based cell-culture assay to detect PLD-inducing drugs. In this paper, we demonstrate that 12 PLD-negative compounds and 11 drugs known to cause PLD in vivo are all correctly identified by using this assay. Interestingly, we found that in cells treated with certain CADs, the fluorescent phospholipid was sequestered in a very specific punctate pattern, which overlapped strongly with the staining pattern seen with a lysosomal marker protein. Our data also show that false positives can be generated with the fluorescence assay when compounds are used at concentrations that cause a >30% decrease in cell number in this assay. Confocal microscopy demonstrated that the staining pattern of fluorescent phospholipids in these cases may be differentiated from those of true positives by the fact that diffuse, rather than punctuate, fluorescence is observed. These studies confirm and expand our previous results showing that the fluorescent phospholipid assay is a highly sensitive, specific tool for detecting PLD-inducing drugs, if care is taken to rule out cytotoxicity-related artifact.