The value of a health insurance database to conduct pharmacoepidemiological studies in oncology.

Some concerns have emerged about the evidence of benefits on survival outcomes or quality of life of new anticancer drugs. In parallel, the decreased cancer mortality leads to an increased number of patients exposed to cancer treatment-related consequences. In this context, pharmacoepidemiology is crucial to assess anticancer drug use, effectiveness and safety in real life conditions. We aimed to describe strengths, limitations and considerations associated with the use of the French national health insurance database (système national des données de santé [SNDS]) to conduct pharmacoepidemiological studies in oncology. The SNDS represents a powerful tool in pharmacoepidemiology owing to its extensive coverage, accurate description and quantification of drug exposure and individual data on patients. The main limitations of this database ensue from the administrative nature resulting in technical difficulties in its management and gaps in availability of data. Another limitation is the lack of accurate identification of diseases, comorbidities or outcomes and potential confounding with notably the lack of data regarding cancer stage, prognosis or risk factors. Finally, the accurate identification of the nature of chemotherapy received by patients is sometimes complex. To minimize these limitations, several approaches and statistical methods could be used as highlighted by national or international initiatives. First, the SNDS may be linked with cancer registry or clinical data. Then, several data sources could be combined using meta-analytical methods. The development of methodological tools and the use of standardized methods are crucial to enhance the quality of studies that can impact clinical practice and guide public decision. Pharmacoepidemiological approaches and pharmacovigilance represent an important cornerstone in oncology for signal detection or long-term follow up of cancer patients. In this context, validated methods to identify cancer patients and to describe chemotherapy regimens within these data should be promoted and remain too scarce despite international guidelines. Moreover, limits and strength of each data sources should be systematically discussed according to the research question. Optimized and framed use of claims database represents a future challenge in onco-pharmacoepidemiology.

Antipsychotics use: 2006-2013 trends in prevalence and incidence and characterization of users.

PURPOSE: The present study was conducted to describe antipsychotic (AP) prevalent and incident use, characteristics of AP users, and their trends in the French population. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was repeated yearly from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2013 (for prevalence analysis) or to December 31, 2012 (for incidence analysis) using the French Health Insurance reimbursement database (Echantillon Généraliste de Bénéficiaires, EGB). For each year studied, prevalent and incident AP users were described in terms of age and gender overall, and according to the type of AP (FGAPs or SGAPs) used at index date. In addition, concurrent medications and comorbidities that a priori contraindicate the use of drugs having atropinic properties were researched. RESULTS: Prevalence and incidence remained relatively stable along the 2007-2013 period. Trends slightly decreased, from 2.07% (n = 10,252) to 2.05% (n = 11,015) for prevalence, and from 0.73% (n = 3461) to 0.66% (n = 3363) for incidence, especially in elderly, in contrast of children and adolescents (+ 39% for prevalence, from 184 to 271). The number of coprescribed drugs was found high (median = 5) and remained constant over time. In 2013, about 7% of prevalent AP users presented with a comorbidity increasing the risk of atropinic ADRs, and 36% used at least one concurrent atropinic drug. In incident AP users, these numbers were of 8 and 29%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The present study highlighted a marked shift from FGAPs toward SGAPs, as well as an increase in AP use in children and adolescents in France.

Life-threatening drug-associated hyperkalemia: a retrospective study from laboratory signals.

PURPOSE: Life-threatening hyperkalemia may be induced by drugs and preventable in at-risk patients. This study was designed to describe cases of 'serious' drug-associated hyperkalemia. METHODS: Adult subjects with a serum potassium concentration above 6.5 mmol/L detected at admission or during hospital stay in nephrology, cardiology, geriatric, emergency or intensive care units were identified by biology laboratories of hospitals and clinics located in Midi-Pyrenees (southwest France). Patients dialyzed for end-stage kidney disease were excluded. Data were collected from medical files. Hyperkalemia was defined as drug-associated if at least one drug known to increase serum potassium concentration was taken when hyperkalemia occurred (among drugs taken in outpatient care for hyperkalemia detected at admission and among drugs taken in outpatient care and continued at hospital and drugs introduced from admission for hyperkalemia detected during hospital stay). RESULTS: Of 168 hyperkalemia cases, 102 (60.7%) were classified as drug-associated. They concerned elderly patients (mean age: 76.1 years) often having arterial hypertension and/or cardiac diseases (88.2%). Risk factors, mainly acute kidney failure, were observed in almost all cases (98.0%). Drugs predominantly involved were angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (47.1%), spironolactone (41.2%), angiotensin II receptor antagonists (23.5%) and potassium supplements (23.5%). In 10% of cases, death could be attributed to hyperkalemia. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory databases allowed an exhaustive identification of hyperkalemia cases. The frequency of drug-related hyperkalemia and their characteristics suggest that treatment with drugs known to increase serum potassium concentration can be inappropriate, especially regarding associations or indications, and is highly risky for predisposed patients.