Minimum Corneal Diameter and Anterior Steep Axis Curvature Share the Same Meridian: A Novel Finding.

PURPOSE: To define the external scleral sulcus (ESS) on a Scheimpflug image and use it for a morphometric analysis of corneal diameter (CD). DESIGN: Retrospective, cross-sectional study of pediatric Asian-Indian eyes. METHODS: One random eye of 353 subjects between 5 and 18 years underwent 25-scan Pentacam HR imaging. For all scans, densitometry values along the anterior corneal edge were recorded and differentiated. The peaks on the differentiated curve were chosen as the ESS points, and this distance between them was called CD. Vertical (vCD), maximum (maxCD), minimum (minCD) CD and their meridians were defined. Multiple regression models (MRMs) with CD and other Pentacam parameters were built to predict astigmatism and its axis, mean keratometry (Kmean), and Belin/Ambrósio enhanced ectasia display deviation (BAD-D). MRMs were validated using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Estimated horizontal CD (hCD) was validated against digital caliper measurement using ICC. RESULTS: The ICC (95% CI) between caliper and hCD was 0.96 (0.93, 0.97). MRM predictions (P < .001) used CD parameters, anterior chamber depth, corneal volume and distance from the corneal thinnest location to apex. These predictions achieved an ICC of 0.34 (0.18, 0.46), 0.82 (0.78, 0.86), 0.87 (0.84, 0.89), and 0.81 (0.76, 0.84), respectively. The astigmatism axis prediction depended on the minCD and maxCD meridians. Its within-subject SD (4.97°) was less than 2 consecutive Pentacam scan angles (7.2°). CONCLUSIONS: The CD metric strongly correlated with the astigmatism axis, keratometry, and BAD-D. Its spatial description may be significant in corneal treatment planning and disease diagnoses.

Anesthesia techniques and the risk of complications as reflected in the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery.

PURPOSE: To determine the trends in anesthesia techniques for cataract surgery over the past decade and their relationship to surgical complications. SETTING: Clinics affiliated with the European Registry of Quality Outcomes for Cataract and Refractive Surgery (EUREQUO). DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional register-based study. METHODS: Variables include patient demographics, visual acuity, ocular comorbidities, surgery characteristics, intraoperative complications, and postoperative complications for the study period from January 2008, to December 2018. The anesthesia methods registered in the EUREQUO and included in the study are topical, combined topical and intracameral, sub-Tenon, regional, and general anesthesia. Multivariate logistic regression models for each complication were constructed to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% CIs. RESULTS: Complete data were available of 1 354 036 cataract surgeries. Topical anesthesia increased significantly over time (from 30% to 76%, P < .001). Sub-Tenon and regional anesthesia decreased (from 27% and 38% to 16% and 6%, respectively, P < .001), and general and combined topical and intracameral anesthesia remained stable (around 2%). Sub-Tenon (OR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.71-0.91, P < .001), regional (0.74; 95% CI, 0.71-0.78, P < .001), general (0.53; 95% CI, 0.50-0.56, P < .001), and intracameral anesthesia (0.76; 95% CI, 0.64-0.90, P = .001) carried a significantly decreased risk of posterior capsule rupture (PCR), with and without dropped nucleus, compared with topical anesthesia. The risk of endophthalmitis was significantly lower with regional anesthesia compared with topical anesthesia (OR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.82, P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: The use of topical anesthesia for cataract surgery increased over time. Topical anesthesia is associated with an increased risk of PCR with and without dropped nucleus, and endophthalmitis.