Factors associated with ciprofloxacin- and cefotaxime-resistant Escherichia coli in women with acute pyelonephritis in the emergency department.

BACKGROUND: High rates of antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli isolated from patients with urinary tract infections have been reported worldwide. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors for resistance to ciprofloxacin (CIP) and cefotaxime (CTX) in E. coli isolated from patients with acute pyelonephritis (APN). METHODS: We prospectively identified women over 18 y of age who visited the emergency department of one of 10 hospitals with APN and whose urine culture grew E. coli. The study was conducted from April 16 to June 10, 2012. RESULTS: Of the 229 patients identified, 173 (75.5%) had community-associated (CA) infections and 56 (24.5%) had healthcare-associated (HCA) infections. Sixty-seven isolates (29.3%) were resistant to CIP, 45 (19.7%) to CTX, and 29 (12.7%) to both CIP and CTX. Multivariate analyses revealed that hematologic disease, chronic kidney disease, a bed-ridden state, indwelling urinary catheter, antibiotic treatment in the preceding 3 months, and isolation of CIP-resistant E. coli in the urine within the preceding 3 months, were significantly associated with resistance to both CIP and CTX. CONCLUSIONS: Chronic conditions and healthcare-associated factors were related to resistance to both fluoroquinolones and third-generation cephalosporins in women with APN. Continued and vigilant surveillance is necessary to monitor the dissemination of antimicrobial resistance in uropathogens.

Clinical implications of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) with VanD phenotype and vanA genotype.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the clinical implications of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (VRE) with VanD phenotype and vanA genotype (VanD-vanA VRE). METHODS: We tested in vitro and in vivo efficacies of teicoplanin against VanD-vanA VRE strains. Change in teicoplanin MICs was monitored during incubation with teicoplanin. In vitro and in vivo time-kill assay and survival analysis using a mouse peritonitis model were performed. RESULTS: Teicoplanin MICs of VanD-vanA VRE strains increased to 128 mg/L within 48 h when they were cultured with 120 mg/L teicoplanin. In vitro and in vivo time-kill assay showed that VanD-vanA VRE strains were not eliminated by 120 mg/L teicoplanin in contrast to vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium and VanD-vanB strains. The survival rate of mice infected with VanD-vanA VRE strains treated with teicoplanin was comparable with that of untreated mice. CONCLUSION: Data suggest that teicoplanin would fail in the treatment of VanD type VRE infections if the strains contained the vanA gene, which cannot be detected in the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Evaluation of a triple-drug combination for treatment of experimental multidrug-resistant pneumococcal meningitis.

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of ceftriaxone + vancomycin + rifampicin (CVR) in the treatment of pneumococcal meningitis caused by a multidrug-resistant strain, single-drug regimens (ceftriaxone 100 mg/kg, rifampicin 15 mg/kg, or vancomycin 20 mg/kg), double-drug regimens (ceftriaxone + vancomycin [CV] and ceftriaxone + rifampicin [CR]) and a triple-drug combination (CVR) with or without dexamethasone were compared in a rabbit meningitis model. Meningitis was induced by a highly penicillin-resistant (MIC 2 mg/l) and ceftriaxone-resistant (MIC 4 mg/l) pneumococcal strain. Final therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by the bacterial concentration at 24 h, and the bacterial killing rate was also evaluated. All combination regimens were superior to ceftriaxone or vancomycin single-drug regimens with regard to sterilisation of CSF and bacterial killing rate. Rifampicin was as effective as combination regimens. Regardless of dexamethasone, therapeutic efficacy of CVR and CR were superior to that of CV. CVR showed comparable therapeutic efficacy to CR. Data suggested that CVR would not have additional therapeutic benefit over CR during the initial 24 h of treatment.