Relationship between health literacy and attitudes toward acupuncture: A web-based cross-sectional survey with a panel of Japanese residents.

The relationship between health literacy of Japanese people, their attitudes toward acupuncture, and their behavior in choosing this therapy is currently unclear. Therefore, for this study, we conducted a web-based survey to address this unknown relationship. A questionnaire comprising four categories (health status, health literacy, previous acupuncture experience, and attitudes toward acupuncture) was administered to 1,600 Japanese participants. For this study, we performed cross-tabulation and path analysis to examine the relationship between each questionnaire item. The mean score of participants' health literacy was 3.41 (SD = 0.74), and older, educated, female participants tended to have higher health literacy. The respondents perceived acupuncture to be effective for chronic low back pain, tension-type headache, and knee pain due to osteoarthritis (40.0%, 38.7%, and 21.8%, respectively). Contrastingly, acupuncture was perceived as far less effective for postoperative nausea/vomiting and prostatitis symptoms (8.3% and 8.7%, respectively). Of the total study respondents, 34.4% reported that they would try acupuncture only if recommended by clinical practice guidelines, and 35.6% agreed that acupuncture is safe. The path analysis showed that attitudes toward acupuncture were significantly influenced by the participants' health literacy, number of information sources, and previous acupuncture experience. However, it was also found that experience with acupuncture was not directly associated with health literacy. Although the Japanese population with higher health literacy is more likely to perceive acupuncture positively, they do not necessarily have sufficient relevant knowledge of the clinical evidence. Therefore, their decision to receive acupuncture may be more dependent on personal narratives rather than clinical evidence. Thus, future challenges lie in individual education of the population on how to choose a reliable health information source, and organizational efforts to provide more reliable health information.

Quality assessment of Japanese clinical practice guidelines including recommendations for acupuncture.

Background: The quality of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) should be extensively evaluated. This study aimed to evaluate Japanese CPGs that include recommendations for acupuncture. Methods: In a literature search, CPGs including recommendations for acupuncture published in Japan until October 2021 were sought. We assessed (1) whether the CPGs were developed in accordance with the Grading Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system, (2) the quality of the CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II, and (3) whether the strength of the recommendations for acupuncture was consistent with each CPG's predefined procedure. Results: Seventeen CPGs including 23 recommendations in total were identified and assessed. (1) Three CPGs were in accordance with the GRADE system. (2) The mean score of overall assessment using AGREE II was 4.5 on a 7-point Likert scale. The mean domain scores were 77% for domain 1 (scope and purpose), 54% for domain 2 (stakeholder involvement), 48% for domain 3 (rigor of development), 78% for domain 4 (clarity of presentation), 20% for domain 5 (applicability), and 51% for domain 6 (editorial independence). (3) The strength of the recommendations for acupuncture in two CPGs was judged to be underestimated. Some of the CPGs contained elementary problems that were not considered in AGREE II. Conclusion: The methodological quality of Japanese CPGs including recommendations for acupuncture was not necessarily high. Since technical issues exist in each field of therapy, the respective experts should be involved in developing and reviewing CPGs to disseminate accurate health information.