Antibiotic Stewardship: Strategies to Minimize Antibiotic Resistance While Maximizing Antibiotic Effectiveness.

Empiric therapy of the septic patient in the hospital is challenging. Antibiotic stewardship is concerned with optimizing antibiotic use and minimizing resistance. Clinicians should avoid overcovering and overtreating colonizing organisms in respiratory secretions and urinary catheters. Empiric therapy should take into account the prevalence of multidrug-resistant organisms in the hospital setting. The most effective resistance prevention strategies is to preferentially select a low resistance potential antibiotic, which should be administered in the highest possible dose without toxicity for the shortest duration to eliminate the infection.

Immunization of cows with novel core glycolipid vaccine induces anti-endotoxin antibodies in bovine colostrum.

BACKGROUND: Translocation of gut-derived Gram-negative bacterial (GNB) lipopolysaccharide (LPS, or endotoxin) is a source of systemic inflammation that exacerbates HIV, cardiovascular and gastrointestinal diseases and malnutrition. The oral administration of bovine colostrum (BC) reduces endotoxemia in patients with impaired gut barrier function. Consequently, BC enriched in antibodies to LPS may ameliorate endotoxemia-related morbidities. We developed a detoxified J5 LPS/group B meningococcal outer membrane protein (J5dLPS/OMP) vaccine that induces antibodies against a highly conserved core region of LPS and protects against heterologous GNB infection. We now examine the ability of this vaccine to elicit anti-core endotoxin antibodies in BC. METHODS: Two cohorts of pregnant cows were immunized with this vaccine in combination with FICA (Cohort 1) or Emulsigen-D (Cohort 2) adjuvants. Antibody responses to the J5 core LPS antigen were measured in both serum and colostrum and compared to antibody levels elicited by a commercially available veterinary vaccine (J5 Bacterin) comprised of heat-killed Escherichia coli O111, J5 mutant bacteria, from which the J5 LPS was purified. RESULTS: The J5dLPS/OMP vaccine induced high titers of serum IgG antibody to J5 LPS in all seven cows. Both IgG and to a lesser extent IgA anti-J5 LPS antibodies were generated in the colostrum. The J5dLPS/OMP vaccine was significantly more immunogenic in mice than was the J5 Bacterin. BC enriched in anti-J5 LPS antibody reduced circulating endotoxin levels in neutropenic rats, a model of "leaky gut". CONCLUSION: The J5dLPS/OMP vaccine elicits high titers of serum anti-endotoxin antibodies in cows that is passed to the colostrum. This BC enriched in anti-core LPS antibodies has the potential to reduce endotoxemia and ameliorate endotoxin-related systemic inflammation in patients with impaired gut barrier function. Since this vaccine is significantly more immunogenic than the J5 Bacterin vaccine, this J5dLPS/OMP vaccine might prove to be more useful for veterinary indications as well.

The next generation of sepsis clinical trial designs: what is next after the demise of recombinant human activated protein C?*.

OBJECTIVE: The developmental pipeline for novel therapeutics to treat sepsis has diminished to a trickle compared to previous years of sepsis research. While enormous strides have been made in understanding the basic molecular mechanisms that underlie the pathophysiology of sepsis, a long list of novel agents have now been tested in clinical trials without a single immunomodulating therapy showing consistent benefit. The only antisepsis agent to successfully complete a phase III clinical trial was human recumbent activated protein C. This drug was taken off the market after a follow-up placebo-controlled trial (human recombinant activated Protein C Worldwide Evaluation of Severe Sepsis and septic Shock [PROWESS SHOCK]) failed to replicate the favorable results of the initial registration trial performed ten years earlier. We must critically reevaluate our basic approach to the preclinical and clinical evaluation of new sepsis therapies. DATA SOURCES: We selected the major clinical studies that investigated interventional trials with novel therapies to treat sepsis over the last 30 years. STUDY SELECTION: Phase II and phase III trials investigating new treatments for sepsis and editorials and critiques of these studies. DATA EXTRACTION: Selected manuscripts and clinical study reports were analyzed from sepsis trials. Specific shortcomings and potential pit falls in preclinical evaluation and clinical study design and analysis were reviewed and synthesized. DATA SYNTHESIS: After review and discussion, a series of 12 recommendations were generated with suggestions to guide future studies with new treatments for sepsis. CONCLUSIONS: We need to improve our ability to define appropriate molecular targets for preclinical development and develop better methods to determine the clinical value of novel sepsis agents. Clinical trials must have realistic sample sizes and meaningful endpoints. Biomarker-driven studies should be considered to categorize specific "at risk" populations most likely to benefit from a new treatment. Innovations in clinical trial design such as parallel crossover design, alternative endpoints, or adaptive trials should be pursued to improve the outlook for future interventional trials in sepsis.

Evaluation of imipenem for prophylaxis and therapy of Yersinia pestis delivered by aerosol in a mouse model of pneumonic plague.

It has been previously shown that mice subjected to an aerosol exposure to Yersinia pestis and treated with ß-lactam antibiotics after a delay of 42 h died at an accelerated rate compared to controls. It was hypothesized that endotoxin release in antibiotic-treated mice accounted for the accelerated death rate in the mice exposed to aerosol Y. pestis. Imipenem, a ß-lactam antibiotic, binds to penicillin binding protein 2 with the highest affinity and produces rounded cells. The binding of imipenem causes cells to lyse quickly and thereby to release less free endotoxin. Two imipenem regimens producing fractions of time that the concentration of free, unbound drug was above the MIC (fT>MIC) of approximately 25% (6/24 h) and 40% (9.5/24 h) were evaluated. In the postexposure prophylaxis study, the 40% and 25% regimens produced 90% and 40% survivorship, respectively. In the 42-h treatment study, both regimens demonstrated a 40 to 50% survivorship at therapy cessation and some deaths thereafter, resulting in a 30% survivorship. As this was an improvement over the results with other ß-lactams, a comparison of both endotoxin and cytokine levels in mice treated with imipenem and ceftazidime (a ß-lactam previously demonstrated to accelerate death in mice during treatment) was performed and supported the original hypotheses; however, the levels observed in animals treated with ciprofloxacin (included as an unrelated antibiotic that is also bactericidal but should cause little lysis due to a different mode of action) were elevated and significantly (7-fold) higher than those with ceftazidime.

A historical overview of bacteriophage therapy as an alternative to antibiotics for the treatment of bacterial pathogens.

The seemingly inexorable spread of antibiotic resistance genes among microbial pathogens now threatens the long-term viability of our current antimicrobial therapy to treat severe bacterial infections such as sepsis. Antibiotic resistance is reaching a crisis situation in some bacterial pathogens where few therapeutic alternatives remain and pan-resistant strains are becoming more prevalent. Non-antibiotic therapies to treat bacterial infections are now under serious consideration and one possible option is the therapeutic use of specific phage particles that target bacterial pathogens. Bacteriophage therapy has essentially been re-discovered by modern medicine after widespread use of phage therapy in the pre-antibiotic era lost favor, at least in Western countries, after the introduction of antibiotics. We review the current therapeutic rationale and clinical experience with phage therapy as a treatment for invasive bacterial infection as novel alternative to antimicrobial chemotherapy.

Inter-α inhibitor proteins: a novel therapeutic strategy for experimental anthrax infection.

Human inter-α inhibitor proteins are endogenous human plasma proteins that function as serine protease inhibitors. Inter-α inhibitor proteins can block the systemic release of proteases in sepsis and block furin-mediated assembly of protective antigen, an essential stop in the intracellular delivery of the anthrax exotoxins, lethal toxin and edema toxin. Inter-α inhibitor proteins administered on hour or up to 24 h after spore challenge with Bacillus anthracis Sterne strain protected mice from lethality if administered with antimicrobial therapy (P < 0.001). These human plasma proteins possess combined actions against anthrax as general inhibitors of excess serine proteases in sepsis and specific inhibitors of anthrax toxin assembly. Inter-α inhibitor proteins could represent a novel adjuvant therapy for the treatment of established anthrax infection.

Advances in sepsis therapy.

During the past 3 years new insights have been gained into the fundamental elements that underlie the pathogenesis of sepsis, and after years of frustrating failures, progress in the basic understanding of sepsis has translated into successful new therapies. These new treatment strategies have significantly improved the outcome of patients experiencing the puzzling syndrome of severe sepsis. More effective supportive therapies with early, goal-oriented therapy including volume resuscitation, catecholamine therapy and transfusion improve the chances for survival in septic shock. Novel endocrine management with hydrocortisone replacement therapy for relative adrenal insufficiency in septic shock patients and strict blood glucose control provide a survival advantage in critically ill patients. Administering appropriate antimicrobial therapy, nutritional support and ventilation protocols with low tidal volumes have now been shown to benefit septic patients. Finally, human recombinant activated protein C (drotrecogin alfa), which ameliorates sepsis-induced disseminated intravascular coagulation and exerts several other favourable effects on endothelial cells, has been shown to reduce mortality in patients with severe sepsis. On the basis of newly discovered pathophysiological mechanisms of sepsis, several other adjuvant therapies for sepsis are in various stages of preclinical and clinical development. Individualised and optimal supportive care with efforts to reverse the precipitating cause of sepsis remains the mainstay of therapy for severe sepsis. How these new and often expensive regimens will fit into the standard treatment approach to sepsis remains to be defined by future clinical investigations.

Effect of anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody on clearance of Escherichia coli bacteremia and endotoxemia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of an anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody on the clearance of a bacteremic Escherichia coli challenge in the presence or absence of antimicrobial agents. DESIGN: Prospective randomized animal study. SETTING: University-affiliated research laboratory. SUBJECTS: New Zealand White rabbits weighing 1.5-2.5 kg. INTERVENTIONS: Animals were pretreated with either an anti-lapine CD14 monoclonal antibody (immunoglobulin G2a, 5 mg/kg intravenously) or an isotype control monoclonal antibody. The animals then were challenged with 1 x 10(6) E. coli 018:K1 in the presence or absence of ceftazidime (50 mg/kg intravenously). There were four groups of six animals randomized to receive either anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody without ceftazidime, isotype control monoclonal antibody without ceftazidime, anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody with ceftazidime, or isotype control antibody with ceftazidime. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Serial measurement of quantitative bacteremia and endotoxemia was performed over 24 hrs after the administration of the bacterial challenge. Animals also underwent necropsy with quantitative bacterial cultures from multiple organ tissue samples. The anti-lapine CD14 monoclonal antibody significantly impaired the bloodstream clearance of E. coli (p <.01) and increased quantitative counts of E. coli in tissue culture samples when compared with isotype control antibody in the absence of simultaneous administration of ceftazidime. No differences in quantitative bacteremia, endotoxemia, or organ tissue counts were found after anti-CD14 antibody and control antibody-treated animals in the presence of ceftazidime treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Anti-CD14 monoclonal antibody has the capacity to interfere with the innate immune response and systemic microbial clearance in experimental animals with E. coli bacteremia. The concomitant administration of effective antimicrobial therapy eliminated differences in the rate of microbial clearance between the control antibody and the CD14 monoclonal antibody. These results indicate that care should be taken in clinical trials with anti-CD14 monoclonal antibodies to ensure that adequate antimicrobial therapy is administered in the presence of systemic bacterial infection.