Effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations of bronchial hyperresponsiveness and bronchial inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that patients with allergic rhinitis have lower airway inflammation and a higher prevalence of bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) regardless of asthma. OBJECTIVE: To investigate markers of lower airway inflammation in nonasthmatic children with seasonal allergic rhinitis (SAR) before and during pollen season and the effect of nasal triamcinolone acetonide on seasonal variations in these parameters. METHODS: Thirty-two nonasthmatic children with SAR in response to grass and/or weed pollens were recruited and separated into 2 groups. Group 1 was treated with triamcinolone acetonide (220 microg once daily) for 6 weeks, and group 2 received no intranasal corticosteroid treatment. Bronchial responsiveness to methacholine [concentration that caused a decrease in forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 20% (PC20)], eosinophil counts in sputum and peripheral blood, and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) levels in sputum and serum were measured before and during grass pollen season. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients completed the study. During the pollen season, methacholine PC20 significantly decreased in both groups when compared with the corresponding preseasonal values (P = .01 and P = .003, respectively). The mean percentage of sputum eosinophils increased significantly during the pollen season compared with preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 (12.7% +/- 2.1% vs 16.5% +/- 2.1%, P = .007, and 11.0% +/- 2.0% vs 20.2% +/- 1.4%, P = .003, respectively). Median [interquartile ranges (IQR)] sputum ECP levels were significantly higher during the pollen season when compared with the preseasonal values in group 1 and group 2 [7.5 microg/L (3.5-36.0 microg/L) vs 35.5 microg/L (13.0-71.7 microg/L), P = .04, and 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L) vs 69.0 microg/L (39.0-195.0 microg/L), P = .003, respectively], as were the serum ECP levels [6.0 microg/L (2.0-13.0 microg/L) vs 19.0 microg/L (14.0-43.5 microg/L), P = .004, and 6.0 microg/L (3.0-7.0 microg/L) vs 18.0 microg/L (6.0-36.0 microg/L), P = .001, respectively]. Although the mean number of eosinophils in blood increased during the pollen season in both groups, it was only significant in group 2 (70.0 +/- 20.0 vs 161.6 +/- 29.0, P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: Although prophylactic nasal corticosteroid treatment provides significant reduction of nasal symptoms and rescue antihistamine use, there is no significant prevention in the seasonal increase of bronchial inflammation and methacholine BHR.

Complementary and alternative medicine in children with asthma.

BACKGROUND: The popularity of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), particularly for chronic conditions such as asthma, is growing rapidly, but little is known about its use in asthmatic children. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent, characteristics, and possible predictors of CAM use in a group of Turkish children with asthma. METHODS: The parents of asthmatic children were invited to participate in a questionnaire-based survey of 13 worldwide and 5 local methods of CAM. Current asthma treatment, asthma exacerbations, emergency admittances and hospitalizations due to exacerbations, and parental education levels were investigated as predictors that influenced the use of CAM. RESULTS: Of the 304 asthmatic children (mean +/- SEM age, 10.5 +/- 0.2 years; range, 1-16 years), 49% (n = 150) had used some form of CAM previously, and 38% had used CAM within the previous year. The most popular forms of CAM were quail eggs (79%), herbal medicine (31%), Turkish wild honey (26%), speleotherapy (5%), and royal jelly (5%). The respondents learned about CAM through friends (61%), relatives (25%), the media (9%), and physicians (6%). Age, sex, and mother's and father's education levels were insignificant between the groups that used and did not use CAM (P = 0.40, P = 0.18, P = 0.15, and P = 0.09, respectively). The use of regular asthma treatment, the use of inhaled corticosteroids, asthma exacerbations, emergency admittances, and treatment score were significantly high in the CAM group (P = 0.006, P = 0.03, P = 0.008, P = 0.02, and P = 0.02, respectively). A significantly high percentage of respondents in the CAM group had considered using CAM for their child's asthma in the future (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Asthmatic children in whom the disease is not well controlled are more likely to use CAM as complementary therapy.