Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Hum Genet ; 104(6): 1088-1096, 2019 06 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31104772

RESUMEN

Conceptual frameworks are useful in research because they can highlight priority research domains, inform decisions about interventions, identify outcomes and factors to measure, and display how factors might relate to each other to generate and test hypotheses. Discovery, translational, and implementation research are all critical to the overall mission of genomic medicine and prevention, but they have yet to be organized into a unified conceptual framework. To fill this gap, our diverse team collaborated to develop the Genomic Medicine Integrative Research (GMIR) Framework, a simple but comprehensive tool to aid the genomics community in developing research questions, strategies, and measures and in integrating genomic medicine and prevention into clinical practice. Here we present the GMIR Framework and its development, along with examples of its use for research development, demonstrating how we applied it to select and harmonize measures for use across diverse genomic medicine implementation projects. Researchers can utilize the GMIR Framework for their own research, collaborative investigations, and clinical implementation efforts; clinicians can use it to establish and evaluate programs; and all stakeholders can use it to help allocate resources and make sure that the full complexity of etiology is included in research and program design, development, and evaluation.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica , Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Genética Médica , Genómica/métodos , Medicina de Precisión/métodos , Enfermedades Raras/genética , Proyectos de Investigación , Humanos , Modelos Teóricos
2.
Am J Sports Med ; 43(1): 128-37, 2015 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25451791

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Diagnostic imaging represents the fastest growing segment of costs in the US health system. This study investigated the cost-effectiveness of alternative diagnostic approaches to meniscus tears of the knee, a highly prevalent disease that traditionally relies on MRI as part of the diagnostic strategy. PURPOSE: To identify the most efficient strategy for the diagnosis of meniscus tears. STUDY DESIGN: Economic and decision analysis; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A simple-decision model run as a cost-utility analysis was constructed to assess the value added by MRI in various combinations with patient history and physical examination (H&P). The model examined traumatic and degenerative tears in 2 distinct settings: primary care and orthopaedic sports medicine clinic. Strategies were compared using the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). RESULTS: In both practice settings, H&P alone was widely preferred for degenerative meniscus tears. Performing MRI to confirm a positive H&P was preferred for traumatic tears in both practice settings, with a willingness to pay of less than US$50,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Performing an MRI for all patients was not preferred in any reasonable clinical scenario. The prevalence of a meniscus tear in a clinician's patient population was influential. For traumatic tears, MRI to confirm a positive H&P was preferred when prevalence was less than 46.7%, with H&P preferred above that. For degenerative tears, H&P was preferred until the prevalence reaches 74.2%, and then MRI to confirm a negative was the preferred strategy. In both settings, MRI to confirm positive physical examination led to more than a 10-fold lower rate of unnecessary surgeries than did any other strategy, while MRI to confirm negative physical examination led to a 2.08 and 2.26 higher rate than H&P alone in primary care and orthopaedic clinics, respectively. CONCLUSION: For all practitioners, H&P is the preferred strategy for the suspected degenerative meniscus tear. An MRI to confirm a positive H&P is preferred for traumatic tears for all practitioners. Consideration should be given to implementing alternative diagnostic strategies as well as enhancing provider education in physical examination skills to improve the reliability of H&P as a diagnostic test. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Alternative diagnostic strategies that do not include the use of MRI may result in decreased health care costs without harm to the patient and could possibly reduce unnecessary procedures.


Asunto(s)
Artroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Ortopedia/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Lesiones de Menisco Tibial , Procedimientos Innecesarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Técnicas de Apoyo para la Decisión , Reacciones Falso Negativas , Reacciones Falso Positivas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Anamnesis , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ortopedia/métodos , Ortopedia/estadística & datos numéricos , Examen Físico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Prevalencia , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Rotura/diagnóstico , Rotura/economía , Rotura/epidemiología , Rotura Espontánea/diagnóstico , Rotura Espontánea/economía , Rotura Espontánea/epidemiología , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Estados Unidos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA