Effect of biofeedback treatment on spinning top urethra in children with voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVES: Spinning top urethra (STU) deformity arises secondary to detrusor instability, leading to an increase in the intravesical pressure against a closed sphincter. We retrospectively analyzed the effect of biofeedback treatment on STU in children with dysfunctional voiding. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with STU and voiding dysfunction were enrolled in this study. The patients divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 49) were treated with simple bladder retraining with timed voiding, and group 2 (n = 72) were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 and 12 month later to determine the status of the STU after both therapies. RESULTS: The patient age range was 5 to 13 years (mean 8.1 +/- 1.9) in group 1 and 5 to 13 years (mean 8.2 +/- 1.7) in group 2. Group 1 consisted of 41 girls and 8 boys; group 2 consisted of 63 girls and 9 boys. Voiding cystourethrography revealed vesicoureteral reflux in 39 and 59 children in groups 1 and 2, respectively. The improvement rates of the biofeedback therapy in children with STU and vesicoureteral reflux were significantly greater than the children treated with timed voiding at 6 months and 1-year of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: For children admitted to urology clinics with urinary infection or complaints thought to be an unstable urinary bladder, proximal urethral dilation called STU is detected at a high frequency. It should be remembered that this situation can be related to vesicoureteral reflux and urinary bladder instability. Biofeedback training is a simple, effective, and well-tolerated treatment modality for these children.

Results of biofeedback treatment on reflux resolution rates in children with dysfunctional voiding and vesicoureteral reflux.

OBJECTIVES: It is well known that a relationship exists between vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and dysfunctional voiding, and the spontaneous resolution rate in older children is lower than the rate in younger children. In this study, we analyzed our experience with biofeedback treatment in older children with confirmed voiding dysfunction and VUR and investigated the effect of this treatment on the reflux resolution rates in these children. METHODS: A total of 78 children, 5 to 14 years old (mean age 9), with voiding dysfunction and VUR detected by voiding cystourethrography were treated with biofeedback therapy. Voiding cystourethrography was performed 6 months after completion of the biofeedback program to determine the reflux status. The treatment results were also documented as subjective and objective improvements. RESULTS: The reflux in 98 units (20 bilateral) was grade 1 in 26, grade 2 in 32, grade 3 in 28, and grade 4 in 12. At 6 months of follow-up, VUR had resolved on voiding cystourethrography in 62 units (63%), the grade had improved in 28 units (29%), and the reflux had remained unchanged in 8 units (8%). Among the older children treated with biofeedback, we also observed improvements in nocturnal enuresis (82%), daytime wetting (70%), constipation (78%), frequency (76%), infrequency (64%), urgency (71%), staccato voiding (81%), flattened voiding (81%), bladder overactivity (82%), detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (77%), spinning top urethra (67%), and urinary tract infection (80%). CONCLUSIONS: Biofeedback therapy is applicable in older children with dysfunctional voiding and VUR and yields greater resolution rates than the historical resolution rates.