Non-pharmacological and pharmacological treatments for bone health after stroke: Systematic review with meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hemi-osteoporosis is a common secondary complication of stroke. No systematic reviews of pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents for post-stroke bone health have estimated the magnitude and precision of effect sizes to guide better clinical practice. OBJECTIVES: To examine the benefits and harms of pharmacological and non-pharmacological agents on bone health in post-stroke individuals. METHODS: Eight databases were searched (PubMed, Cochrane library, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Embase, PEDro, Clinicaltrils.gov and ICTRP) up to June 2023. Any controlled studies that applied physical exercise, supplements, or medications and measured bone-related outcomes in people with stroke were included. PEDro and the GRADE approach were used to examine the methodological quality of included articles and quality of evidence for outcomes. Effect sizes were calculated as standardized mean differences (SMD) and risk ratio (RR). Review Manager 5.4 was used for data synthetization. RESULTS: Twenty-four articles from 21 trials involving 22,500 participants (3,827 in 11 non-pharmacological and 18,673 in 10 pharmacological trials) were included. Eight trials were included in the meta-analysis. The methodological quality of half of the included non-pharmacological studies was either poor or fair, whereas it was good to excellent in 8 of 10 pharmacological studies. Meta-analysis revealed a beneficial effect of exercise on the bone mineral density (BMD) of the paretic hip (SMD: 0.50, 95 % CI: 0.16; 0.85; low-quality evidence). The effects of anti-resorptive medications on the BMD of the paretic hip were mixed and thus inconclusive (low-quality evidence). High-quality evidence showed that the administration of antidepressants increased the risk of fracture (RR: 2.36, 95 % CI 1.64-3.39). CONCLUSION: Exercise under supervision may be beneficial for hip bone health in post-stroke individuals. The effect of anti-resorptive medications on hip BMD is uncertain. The adverse effects of antidepressants on fracture risk among post-stroke individuals warrant further attention. Further high-quality studies are required to better understand this issue. REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42022359186.

Minimal Clinically Important Difference of Four Commonly Used Balance Assessment Tools in Individuals after Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Although balance is commonly assessed during the recovery of total knee arthroplasty (TKA), the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) values of frequently used balance assessment tools have not been established previously in this population. OBJECTIVE: To determine the MCID of four balance tests-ie, the Balance Evaluation Systems Test (BESTest), Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, and the Berg Balance Scale (BBS)-in individuals post-TKA. DESIGN: Prospective cohort. SETTING: Outpatient rehabilitation. PARTICIPANTS: Inclusion criteria: (1) first primary TKA with diagnosed knee osteoarthritis; (2) aged 50-85 years. EXCLUSION CRITERIA: (1) TKA due to rheumatoid arthritis of the knee or traumatic injury; (2) known medical conditions that influence balance ability. One hundred forty-six participants were recruited, and 134 of them with complete data were included in the analysis. INTERVENTIONS: Participants received individualized physiotherapy, consisting of electrotherapy for pain and edema control, mobilization and strengthening exercises, and gait and balance training, once or twice per week between assessments. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: Participants were assessed on the BESTest, Mini-BESTest, Brief-BESTest, BBS, and Functional Gait Assessment (FGA) 2 and 4 weeks after surgery. The FGA was used as the anchor reference measure to calculate the MCID of the other four balance tests. A distribution-based approach was also employed to derive the MCID (ie, standardized effect size of 0.5). RESULTS: The BESTest (area under curve [AUC] = 0.811, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.739-0.883) had the highest accuracy in detecting clinically important improvements on the FGA (≥4 points), followed by the Mini-BESTest (AUC = 0.782, 95% CI 0.704-0.860), Brief-BESTest (AUC = 0.701, 95% CI 0.618-0.795), and BBS (AUC = 0.586, 95% CI 0.490-0.682). The anchor- and distribution-based MCIDs were 6-8 for the BESTest, 1-2 for the Mini-BESTest, and 2-3 for the Brief-BESTest. CONCLUSIONS: Improvements exceeding MCIDs established above are indicative of significant progress in balance function post-TKA. The BBS is not a recommended tool due to its low AUC value.