Detection of novel therapies using a multi-national, multi-institutional registry of cutaneous immune-related adverse events and management.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) remain a prevalent and common sequelae of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy, often necessitating treatment interruption and prolonged immune suppression. Treatment algorithms are still poorly defined, based on single-institution case reports without adequate safety assessments, and subject to publication bias. METHODS: Data in this registry were collected through a standardized REDCap form distributed to dermatologists via email listserv. RESULTS: Ninety-seven cirAEs were reported from 13 institutions in this registry. Topical and systemic steroids were the most common treatments used; however, targeted treatment matched to disease morphology was identified at numerous sites. Novel cirAE therapy uses that to our knowledge have not been previously described were captured including tacrolimus for the treatment of follicular, bullous, and eczematous eruptions and phototherapy for eczematous eruptions. Moreover, further evidence of cirAE treatment applications sparsely described in literature were also captured in this study including dupilumab and rituximab for bullous eruptions, phototherapy for lichenoid and psoriasiform eruptions, and acitretin for psoriasiform eruptions, among others. No serious adverse events were reported. Numerous targeted therapeutics including dupilumab, rituximab, and psoriasis biologics, among others, were associated with a cirAE grade improvement of ≥2 grades in every patient treated. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that a multi-institutional registry of cirAEs and management is not only feasible but that the information collected can be used to detect, evaluate, and rigorously assess targeted treatments for cirAEs. Further expansion and modification to include treatment progression may allow for sufficient data for specific treatment recommendations to be made.

Risk Factors for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Immunotherapy Toxicity Among Older Adults with Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Immune checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy (IO) is revolutionizing cancer care but can lead to significant toxicity. This study seeks to describe potential risk factors for immune-related adverse events (irAEs) specifically among older adults. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study at a single academic comprehensive cancer center based on chart review data abstracted by physicians. For patients aged ≥70 years, frequency, type, and grade of irAEs and their association with baseline patient demographics, comorbidities, mobility, and functional status were characterized using bivariate analysis. Based on those results, multivariable logistic regressions were constructed to model the association between these characteristics with any grade and grade 3 or higher irAEs. RESULTS: Data were analyzed for 238 patients aged ≥70 years who received IO for mostly (≥90%) advanced cancer between 2011 and 2018. Thirty-nine percent of older adults experienced an irAE and 13% experienced one that was grade 3 or higher. In the multivariable analysis, depression was associated with an increased incidence of any grade irAE, while decreased life-space mobility was associated with an increased incidence of grade ≥3 irAEs. CONCLUSION: Most characteristics of special interest among older adults, include fall risk, weight loss, cognitive limitations, and hearing loss, were not associated with irAEs in our study. However, decreased life-space mobility and depression are potential risk factors for IO toxicity among older adults with advanced cancer. Interventions designed to evaluate and mitigate modifiable risk factors for treatment-related toxicity are needed, and the results of this study may be useful for guiding those efforts.

Metastatic Adrenocortical Carcinoma: a Single Institutional Experience.

Adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) is a rare malignancy with limited data to guide the management of metastatic disease. The optimal treatment strategies and outcomes of patients with metastatic ACC remain areas of active interest. We retrospectively reviewed patients with ACC who were treated with systemic therapy between January 1997 and October 2016 at The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center. Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards regression models were used for survival analysis. We identified 65 patients diagnosed with ACC during the given time period, and 36 patients received systemic therapy for distant metastatic disease. Median age at diagnosis was 50 (range 28-87). Median overall survival (OS) from time of diagnosis of ACC was 27 months (95% CI 19.6-39.3), and median OS from time of systemic treatment for metastatic disease was 18.7 months (95% CI 9.3-26.0). Clinical characteristics at time of initiation of systemic therapy were assessed, and presence of bone metastases (p = 0.66), ascites (p = 0.19), lung metastases (p = 0.12), liver metastases (p = 0.47), as well as hormonal activity of tumor (p = 0.19), were not prognostic for survival. Six patients with liver metastases treated with systemic therapy who received liver-directed therapy with either transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) or selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) had longer survival than those who did not (p = 0.011). Our data expands the knowledge of clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with ACC and suggests a possible role for incorporating liver-directed therapies for patients with hepatic metastases.