Resistant Cytomegalovirus Infection After Renal Transplantation: Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Resistant cytomegalovirus (R-CMV) is an emerging problem in the renal transplantation population. The most frequent CMVs are high-resistance mutations (UL97 gene). METHODS: We describe our experience in management of R-CMV after renal transplant at our center (2012-2016). RESULTS: We encountered 3 cases of R-CMV infection after renal transplant (all primary infections). All 3 patients received induction therapy with corticosteroids, tacrolimus, and mycophenolate mofetil. The first patient (basiliximab induction, preemptive CMV) developed CMV replication on day +53, which responded poorly both to standard-dose valganciclovir (vGCV) and high-dose ganciclovir (GCV) (creatinine clearance [CrCl] >70 mL/min; vGCV 900 mg twice daily for 50 days and GCV 7.5 mg/kg twice daily for 8 days). Hematologic toxicity occurred. The R-CMV test was positive and foscarnet (FOS) was initiated (90 mg/kg twice daily for 21 days). The second patient presented CMV infection (day +30, thymoglobulin induction, CMV prophylaxis), which was not controlled with the high dose (CrCl 23 mL/min; GCV 3.5 mg/kg twice daily and vGCV 900 mg twice daily), resulting in severe neutropenia. R-CMV was detected and FOS initiated (FOS 50 mg/kg twice daily for 7 days and 50 mg/kg every 2 days for 13 days). The third patient's infection occurred on day +22 (basiliximab induction, preemptive CMV). Standard-dose vGCV was uneffective (CrCl >70 mL/min, vGCV 900 mg twice daily) and it did not respond to the high dose (GCV 7.5 mg/kg twice daily and vGCV 2700 mg/d). Moderate hematologic toxicity occurred. R-CMV was diagnosed and FOS treatment begun (FOS 70 mg/kg per day for 2 weeks). CONCLUSIONS: Resistant CMV infection may be severe due to viral infection and side effects of high-dose antiviral treatment. We presented 3 cases requiring the use of FOS in the absence of response or toxic effects from the usual treatment, with an optimal sustained response (temporary in case 2) and without serious side effects.

[Treatment of hyperphosphatemia with sevelamer in patients with chronic renal failure]. / Tratamiento de la hiperfosfatemia con sevelamer en pacientes con insuficiencia renal crónica avanzada.

UNLABELLED: Sevelamer is a recent phosphate binder that is mineral-free, and represents a great advance in the treatment of hyperphosphatemia in patients with hypercalcemia and/or gastric intolerance to calcium-based phosphate binders. The communications about the experience with the use of sevelamer in patients non-yet in dialysis is scanty. The aim of our study is to investigate retrospectively the gastrointestinal tolerance of sevelamer, their efficacy as phosphate binder and other parameters in a group of 89 patients with chronic renal failure in predialysis. We have analysed the effects of sevelamer at baseline and after 1, 3 and 6 months on the following data and parameters: calcium, phosphate, intact PTH, venous bicarbonate, urea, creatinine, creatinine clearance, side-effects, number of patients that were discontinued, and co-treatment during the study period with phosphate-based binders, calcitriol, lipid-lowering drugs and sodium bicarbonate. RESULTS: 19 patients (21.3%) refused to continue with sevelamer at the first month (16 patients had digestive intolerance and 3 several symptoms). Serum phosphate fell at 3 months (5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl basal vs 4.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dl, p = 0.02) and 6 months (5 +/- 0.8 mg/dl basal vs 4.7 +/- 0.9 mg/dl, p = 0.07). Serum calcium fell at 6 months (9.8 +/- 0.7 mg/dl basal vs 9.4 +/- 0.6 mg/dl, p = 0.03). Venous bicarbonate and iPTH were unchanged, but the quantity of sodium bicarbonate administered increased significantly. Blood cholesterol fell at 1 months (193 +/- 49 mg/dl basal vs 173 +/- 52 mg/dl, p = 0.001) and 3 months (205 +/- 49 mg/dl basal vs 170 +/- 49 mg/dl, p = 0.004), in spite of a significant reduction of the dose of statins. CONCLUSIONS: Sevelamer is an effective phosphate binder in predialysis patients and also reduces significantly the serum cholesterol, improving the blood lipid profile. The levels of venous bicarbonate remained unchanged, at expenses of an increment in the dose of sodium bicarbonate supplementation.