Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
JAMA ; 325(4): 353-362, 2021 01 26.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33427870

RESUMEN

Importance: Antibiotics are an effective and safe alternative to appendectomy for managing uncomplicated acute appendicitis, but the optimal antibiotic regimen is not known. Objective: To compare oral antibiotics with combined intravenous followed by oral antibiotics in the management of computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Appendicitis Acuta (APPAC) II multicenter, open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from April 2017 until November 2018 in 9 Finnish hospitals. A total of 599 patients aged 18 to 60 years with computed tomography-confirmed uncomplicated acute appendicitis were enrolled in the trial. The last date of follow-up was November 29, 2019. Interventions: Patients randomized to receive oral monotherapy (n = 295) received oral moxifloxacin (400 mg/d) for 7 days. Patients randomized to receive intravenous antibiotics followed by oral antibiotics (n = 288) received intravenous ertapenem (1 g/d) for 2 days followed by oral levofloxacin (500 mg/d) and metronidazole (500 mg 3 times/d) for 5 days. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary end point was treatment success (≥65%) for both groups, defined as discharge from hospital without surgery and no recurrent appendicitis during 1-year follow-up, and to determine whether oral antibiotics alone were noninferior to intravenous and oral antibiotics, with a margin of 6% for difference. Results: Among 599 patients who were randomized (mean [SD] age, 36 [12] years; 263 [44%] women), 581 (99.7%) were available for the 1-year follow-up. The treatment success rate at 1 year was 70.2% (1-sided 95% CI, 65.8% to ∞) for patients treated with oral antibiotics and 73.8% (1-sided 95% CI, 69.5% to ∞) for patients treated with intravenous followed by oral antibiotics. The difference was -3.6% ([1-sided 95% CI, -9.7% to ∞]; P = .26 for noninferiority), with the confidence limit exceeding the noninferiority margin. Conclusion and Relevance: Among adults with uncomplicated acute appendicitis, treatment with 7 days of oral moxifloxacin compared with 2 days of intravenous ertapenem followed by 5 days of levofloxacin and metronidazole resulted in treatment success rates greater than 65% in both groups, but failed to demonstrate noninferiority for treatment success of oral antibiotics compared with intravenous followed by oral antibiotics. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03236961; EudraCT Identifier: 2015-003633-10.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicitis/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Aguda , Administración Intravenosa , Administración Oral , Adulto , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Antibacterianos/efectos adversos , Apendicectomía , Apendicitis/diagnóstico por imagen , Apendicitis/cirugía , Quimioterapia Combinada , Ertapenem/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Levofloxacino/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Metronidazol/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Moxifloxacino/uso terapéutico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Adulto Joven
2.
BMC Surg ; 10: 24, 2010 Aug 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20684783

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: To analyse in a prospective trial the long-term results of Lichtenstein hernioplasty performed by surgical trainees. METHODS: Training of tension-free Lichtenstein hernia operation was started in our ambulatory unit as an outpatient procedure under local anaesthesia in 1996. After performing 36 teaching operations together with residents and their supervising specialist, 281 patients were operated during 1996-2000 either by one senior consultant (n = 141) or by 12 surgical trainees (n = 140). After 10 years, 247 (88%) patients were available for the long-term assessment. RESULTS: After one month postoperatively, the rate of wound infections (consultant 1.1%, residents 0.7%) and hematomas (consultant 1.1%, residents 3.0%) were low and not related to surgeon's training level (ns). Only 6 (2.1%) clinically evident recurrences were found after 10 years: two after specialist repair and four after trainee repair (ns). Although one third of the patients reported some discomfort after 3 and 10 years, 93-95% of the patients were very satisfied with the operation, with no statistical difference between the surgeons. CONCLUSION: Ambulatory open mesh repair under local anaesthesia was a safe operation and the long-term results were acceptable among the patients operated by surgical trainees.


Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Cirugía General/educación , Cirugía General/normas , Hernia Inguinal/cirugía , Auditoría Médica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anestesia Local , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Mallas Quirúrgicas , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA