Allergenic differences among pollens of three Salsola species.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to Chenopodiaceae is a frequent cause of allergic respiratory diseases in geographic areas where sensitization to Salsola kali and Chenopodium album has been reported. The objective of this study was to evaluate the pattern of sensitization to 3 Salsola species in patients residing on the Mediterranean coast of south-eastern Spain. METHODS: S. kali, S. vermiculata and S. oppositifolia pollen extracts were prepared. Patients reporting respiratory and/or cutaneous symptoms were skin prick tested with the 3 Salsola extracts. Individuals with positive skin prick tests to at least 1 of the 3 Salsola species were included. Specific IgE was determined by direct ELISA. SDS-PAGE and 2-D analysis were conducted to elucidate the protein profile. The allergenic profile was investigated by immunoblot. Inhibition experiments were conducted to establish cross-reactivity between different species. RESULTS: 246 patients were included. 237 patients (96.3%) tested positive to S. oppositifolia, 189 (76.8%) to S. kali and 185 (75.2%) to S. vermiculata. Protein profile and immunoblot demonstrated similar patterns in all extracts, except in low-molecular-weight allergens of S. oppositifolia. Immunoblot inhibition experiments demonstrated that most high-molecular-weight allergens of S. oppositifolia were inhibited by S. kali whereas low-molecular-weight allergens were totally inhibited only by C. album. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the allergenic importance of other Salsola species, especially S. oppositifolia. We have demonstrated that the 3 species show a high degree of cross-reactivity, but S. oppositifolia shares more allergenic similarities with C. album than S. kali.

Sensitization to tomato peel and pulp extracts in the Mediterranean Coast of Spain: prevalence and co-sensitization with aeroallergens.

BACKGROUND: Tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum) are consumed world-wide. The prevalence of sensitization to tomatoes remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of skin test reactivity to tomato and to describe the characteristics of tomato-sensitized subjects. METHODS: Individuals attending for the first time during the period of the study to six Allergy centres, located along the Mediterranean coast of Spain, reporting respiratory and/or cutaneous symptoms, were included. All patients were skin prick tested with a battery of inhalant allergens and with peel and pulp of Canary tomato extracts. RESULTS: The study included 1734 individuals (757 males, 977 females; 31.9+/-17.8 years old). The prevalence of sensitization to tomato was 6.52% (113 patients; 65 males, 48 females; 29.5+/-13 years old). The peel extract was positive in 110 patients and the pulp extract in 47 patients; three patients were positive exclusively to pulp. Only 1.8% of individuals reported symptoms with tomato; 44% of them had skin test negative to both extracts. Among tomato-sensitized subjects, 16% reported symptoms with tomato, 97% were sensitized to inhalant aeroallergens, including 84% to pollens (mainly Artemisia vulgaris and Platanus hybrida), with differences between Northern and Southern centres. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence found of skin test sensitivity to tomato is high. Peel extracts detected most of the sensitized subjects. Most of the sensitized subjects were asymptomatic and some patients reported symptoms without skin test sensitivity. Positive subjects were very frequently sensitized to pollens, suggesting allergen cross-reactivity. Regional differences may exist, possibly related to the pattern of sensitization to cross-reacting pollens.

Tolerance of a Salsola kali extract standardized in biological units administered by subcutaneous route. Multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: Sensitivity to Salsola kali is a frequent cause of allergic respiratory disease in various regions of Spain. However, there are very few articles in which this allergen has been studied. METHODS AND RESULTS: In order to evaluate the tolerance of this extract, a prospective study has been performed. This study was observational, multi-centred and open, involving 88 patients with allergic respiratory disease due to sensitivity to Salsola, aged between 5 and 52 years. The administration of the extract was performed subcutaneously, through one of two treatment schedules: cluster (8 doses in 4 visits) or conventional (13 doses in 12 visits). A total of 42 adverse reactions were registered, in 26 patients (35 local reactions in 21 patients and 7 systemic reactions in 6 patients). Among the 7 systemic reactions, 4 were registered with the cluster protocol and 2 with the conventional protocol (p = 0.329). In no patients were serious adverse reactions registered. CONCLUSION: The subcutaneous administration of a Salsola extract is safe and well tolerated, both when administered using a conventional schedule and when using a cluster schedule.

Clinical efficacy and safety of a depigmented and glutaraldehyde polymerized therapeutic vaccine of Parietaria judaica.

BACKGROUND: The inhalation of Parietaria judaica pollen is a common cause of allergic respiratory diseases in the Mediterranean area. The objective of this study was to investigate the safety and clinical efficacy of a chemically modified (depigmented and glutaraldehyde-polymerized) vaccine of Parietaria judaica. METHODS AND RESULTS: Thirty patients with a well-documented clinical history of seasonal rhinitis and clinical sensitivity to Parietaria judaica pollen were included in a randomized trial during 12 months. The study was conducted following good clinical practices and appropriate consent forms were signed. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 15 individuals; group A received the modified extract and group C did not receive specific immunotherapy. Any adverse event was recorded to assess safety. Symptom scores, symptomatic medication use and the results of specific nasal challenges (before and after 12 months of treatment) were recorded to evaluate clinical efficacy. The treatment schedule consisted of an incremental phase of 5 injections and a maintenance dosage of 0.5 ml per month. Each patient received 14 injections during this period. All the patients completed the trial and no adverse reactions related to immunotherapy were recorded. A significant difference (p < 0.001) in symptom scores and overall use of symptomatic medication was observed between the two groups, being both scores lower in group A. No significant differences in nasal sensitivity existed before treatment among the 2 groups. However, after 12 months, a significant difference (p < 0.05) was observed only in group A patients, who showed a significant improvement in specific nasal challenges. CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy with depigmented and glutaraldehyde-polymerized extract of Parietaria judaica pollen is safe and effective to treat patients with allergic rhinitis and clinical sensitivity to this pollen.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of two preseasonal regimens of glutaraldehyde modified, tyrosine-adsorbed parietaria pollen extract over a period of three years in monosensitive patients.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy over a period of three years (1988-90) of two preseasonal dosage regimens of a Parietaria allergoid (Bencard Tyrosine Parietaria) in patients who were only sensitive to this pollen. Fifty patients were included (14 men and 36 women, age: mean, 28 years; range, 14-47 years). Twenty five patients (group A) were treated each january with the basic course of Bencard Tyrosine Parietaria. This consisted of injecting subcutaneously 0.5 ml from each of three vials, with one week between each injection. A further injection using the vial with the highest dose was given one week later. Each january and february, twenty five patients (group B) were treated with the basic course of Bencard Tyrosine Parietaria, repeating the last dose five times, with one week between each injection. Immunotherapy with a tyrosine-adsorbed Parietaria judaica allergoid is an effective method for mitigating nasal (p < 0.0001), bronchial (p < 0.005), conjunctival (p < 0.001) and palatal itching symptoms (p < 0.0001) in patients who are sensitive to this pollen. Sensitivity to Parietaria pollen, as verified by skin test and nasal challenge, decreased during immunotherapy (p < 0.001). Histamine release by peripheral blood basophils decreased during the course of the study, falling from 43.5 ng/ml to 12.3 ng/ml in group A and from 42.9 ng/ml to 10.0 ng/ml in group B; during the second and third years, IgG levels were increased one and four months after starting treatment with the extract, while this was not the case after ten months; IgE levels were also increased. Finally, overall tolerance to this immunotherapy product was good in almost all patients.

[Comparative study between 10 and 20 mg of cetirizine in the symptomatic treatment of seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis]. / Estudio comparativo entre 10 y 20 mg de cetirizina en el tratamiento sintomático de la rinoconjuntivitis alérgica estacional.

Our patients with seasonal allergic rhinoconjunctivitis usually present severe clinical symptoms. A single daily dose of cetirizine 10 mg might be insufficient for these patients. To investigate this hypothesis we compared clinical efficacy and adverse side effects between two daily doses of cetirizine, 10 and 20 mg. We designed a comparative open randomized study, including 38 patients, with hay fever sensitized to local pollens (grass, olive, parietaria judaica, chenopodium album, artemisia vulgaris and plantago lanceolata) diagnosed by clinical history and a positive skin prick test (wheal > 3 mm), 20 women and 18 men, aged 17 to 57 years (x: 31.32 +/- 9.73), living in the same geographic area. Randomly, after a week run in period, 21 subjects received a daily dose of cetirizine 10 mg during 2 weeks, and the other 17 received 10 mg twice a day. The symptomatic score used was based on: sneezes number, nasal itching, nasal secretion, nasal congestion, ocular itching, lacrimation, weight gain, sedation and additional methylprednisolone usage. All symptoms were scored on a 0-3 scale (0: absent; 1: mild; 2: moderate; 3: severe). A mean 8 points daily score during the previous week was required for recruitment. Nasal eosinophilia was determined at baseline and at the end of treatment. The study was conducted in may 1992. We did not find significant differences between the two groups, except in sneezes number and sedation. Both groups improved their symptoms, in comparison with the basal week (p < 0.01) and reduced their oral steroid use (p < 0.01).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cost-effectiveness of various methods of diagnosing hypersensitivity to Alternaria.

This study was undertaken for two reasons: 1) It is more difficult to diagnose hypersensitivity to molds than to other allergens, so an evaluation of diagnostic tests was needed. 2) Alternaria is the principal cause of mold sensitization in our area. Sixty-six patients (20 +/- 4 years) were selected and divided into two groups. Group A was made up of patients with rhinitis and/or asthma due to Alternaria sensitization. Group B consisted of patients sensitized to other allergens and patients with nonrespiratory allergic disorders. Skin tests (prick and intradermal), challenge tests (conjunctival, nasal, and bronchial), and specific IgE determination were performed for all patients. A biologically standardized extract of Alternaria tenuis (Alergia e Inmunología Abelló, S. A., Madrid, Spain) obtained from a single batch was used for all tests. Our diagnostic criterion was a clinical history of rhinitis or asthma that coincided with the results of nasal/bronchial challenge. The diagnostic value of the other tests was compared to this criterion. In the group of rhinitic patients, skin tests and conjunctival challenge were more sensitive than specific IgE determination. In asthmatic patients, the most sensitive techniques were nasal and conjunctival challenges, followed by prick and intradermal skin tests, and, lastly, serum specific IgE determination. When rhinitis and asthma were considered jointly, the most sensitive test was conjunctival challenge, followed by skin-prick and intradermal tests. All tests had the same specificity, regardless of disorder. Nasal challenge was positive in all patients. Skin tests are easy to perform, cheap, non-traumatic for the patient, and sufficiently specific and sensitive for the diagnosis of Alternaria hypersensitivity.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

[Immediate hypersensitivity to fruits and vegetables and pollenosis]. / Hipersensibilidad inmediata a frutas y verduras y polinosis.

Various works have been published, mainly by Scandinavian authors, in which a partial immunological identity has been found to exist between birch pollen and hazelnut and apple. However, our attention has been particularly drawn to the high proportion of people who are allergic to the apple and other fruits, which in some cases has been as much as 50 and 70%, and in whom an oral pruritus alone is considered sufficient a symptom of allergies to certain foodstuffs. However due to the fact that the incidence of allergies to fruit in patients who suffer from pollen-related allergies is much lower in this area, being in the order of 7%, and because of the absence of birch, we decided to carry out our investigation in the opposite direction to that chosen by the Scandinavian researchers. That is to say, from the point of view of patients suffering from allergies to fruits and vegetables (these being the foodstuffs which most frequently produce allergic reactions in our own particular environment) we decided to investigate: 1) which foodstuffs, according to clinical history, are most frequently responsible for producing allergies; 2) their possible co-existence with pollen related allergies; 3) which pollens are responsible for producing a higher rate of positive results in patients; 4) and finally, by means of the RAST inhibition technique, to discover it a cross-reactivity might exist between these pollens and the peanut or the pea. We chose 40 patients (19 females and 21 males), between the ages of 5 and 49 years old, whose clinical history showed beyond a shadow of a doubt that they displayed symptoms of immediate hypersensitivity after the ingestion of certain fruits and/or vegetables. The technique employed in the skin tests was that of scratch of the skin from the backs of the patients (in a prone position), systematically using fresh natural foodstuffs, and at the same time trying to ensure that they were of the same type as those that had originally produced the above-mentioned symptoms in the patients. On 193 occasions we carried out passive transfers (the Prausnitz-Küstner method or P.K.), and on 13 patients we carried out oral provocative tests (cases with positive scratch and uncertain clinical histories). With regard to the pollens, we used glycerine-based antigens of the type: Lolium perenne, Olea europeae, Artemisia vulgaris and Parietaria officinalis of Dome/Hollister-Stier, and the Bencard gramineae.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Selective growth in serum-free hormone-supplemented medium of tumor cells obtained by biopsy from patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung.

Fifteen tumor-containing specimens were obtained directly from patients with small cell carcinoma of the lung and tested for their ability to grow in serum-supplemented medium and in serum-free medium supplemented with hydrocortisone, insulin, transferrin, estrogen, and selenium (HITES). The tumor cells replicated in 14 of 15 cases (93%) in the HITES medium and in 10 of 15 cases (67%) in the serum-supplemented medium. The neoplastic origin of the cells growing in the HITES medium was confirmed by standard cytologic criteria, by DNA content analysis using flow cytometry, and by their ability to form colonies in agarose and tumors in athymic nude mice. While the tumor cells had very similar morphologies in both media, the serum-free medium did not support the growth of nonmalignant stromal cells, and essentially pure cultures of replicating tumor cells were obtained 7-10 days after plating. The selectivity of the HITES medium was demonstrated by the failure of cells to grow in 20 specimens cytologically negative for small cell carcinoma and in 9 of 10 specimens containing other tumor types (including other types of lung cancer). The results demonstrate that a chemically defined medium, determined by work on tissue culture-adapted human tumor lines, can support the selective growth of tumor specimens obtained directly from patients. Such selective formulas are probably specific for different tumor types and thus could be used for diagnosis, drug sensitivity testing in vitro, and identification of factors regulating tumor growth. All of these have direct application to patient treatment.