Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Clin Cancer Res ; 22(18): 4545-9, 2016 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27401247

RESUMEN

On December 11, 2015, the FDA approved uridine triacetate (VISTOGARD; Wellstat Therapeutics Corporation) for the emergency treatment of adult and pediatric patients following a fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose regardless of the presence of symptoms, and of those who exhibit early-onset, severe, or life-threatening toxicity affecting the cardiac or central nervous system, and/or early onset, unusually severe adverse reactions (e.g., gastrointestinal toxicity and/or neutropenia) within 96 hours following the end of fluorouracil or capecitabine administration. Uridine triacetate is not recommended for the nonemergent treatment of adverse reactions associated with fluorouracil or capecitabine because it may diminish the efficacy of these drugs, and the safety and efficacy of uridine triacetate initiated more than 96 hours following the end of administration of these drugs has not been established. The approval is based on data from two single-arm, open-label, expanded-access trials in 135 patients receiving uridine triacetate (10 g or 6.2 g/m(2) orally every 6 hours for 20 doses) for fluorouracil or capecitabine overdose, or who exhibited severe or life-threatening toxicities within 96 hours following the end of fluorouracil or capecitabine administration. Ninety-six percent of patients met the major efficacy outcome measure, which was survival at 30 days or survival until the resumption of chemotherapy, if prior to 30 days. The most common adverse reactions were vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. This article summarizes the FDA review of this New Drug Application, the data supporting approval of uridine triacetate, and the unique regulatory situations encountered by this approval. Clin Cancer Res; 22(18); 4545-49. ©2016 AACR.


Asunto(s)
Acetatos/farmacología , Acetatos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas , Neoplasias/terapia , Uridina/análogos & derivados , Acetatos/química , Animales , Antineoplásicos/química , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Capecitabina/efectos adversos , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Neoplasias/diagnóstico , Uso Excesivo de Medicamentos Recetados , Proyectos de Investigación , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration , Uridina/química , Uridina/farmacología , Uridina/uso terapéutico
2.
Clin Cancer Res ; 21(19): 4257-61, 2015 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26187614

RESUMEN

On December 19, 2014, the FDA approved olaparib capsules (Lynparza; AstraZeneca) for the treatment of patients with deleterious or suspected deleterious germline BRCA-mutated (gBRCAm) advanced ovarian cancer who have been treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. The BRACAnalysis CDx (Myriad Genetic Laboratories, Inc.) was approved concurrently. An international multicenter, single-arm trial enrolled 137 patients with measurable gBRCAm-associated ovarian cancer treated with three or more prior lines of chemotherapy. Patients received olaparib at a dose of 400 mg by mouth twice daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The objective response rate (ORR) was 34% with median response duration of 7.9 months in this cohort. The most common adverse reactions (≥20%) in patients treated with olaparib were anemia, nausea, fatigue (including asthenia), vomiting, diarrhea, dysgeusia, dyspepsia, headache, decreased appetite, nasopharyngitis/pharyngitis/upper respiratory infection, cough, arthralgia/musculoskeletal pain, myalgia, back pain, dermatitis/rash, and abdominal pain/discomfort. Myelodysplatic syndrome and/or acute myeloid leukemia occurred in 2% of the patients enrolled on this trial.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Aprobación de Drogas , Genes BRCA1 , Genes BRCA2 , Mutación de Línea Germinal , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ováricas/genética , Ftalazinas/uso terapéutico , Piperazinas/uso terapéutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Animales , Antineoplásicos/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ováricas/patología , Ftalazinas/farmacología , Piperazinas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/farmacología , Inhibidores de Poli(ADP-Ribosa) Polimerasas/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos
3.
J Biol Chem ; 277(42): 39350-9, 2002 Oct 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12177050

RESUMEN

Vav family proteins are members of the Dbl family of guanine nucleotide exchange factors and activators of Rho family small GTPases. In addition to the Dbl homology (DH) domain important for guanine nucleotide exchange factor catalytic function, all Dbl family proteins contain an adjacent pleckstrin homology (PH) domain that serves to regulate DH domain activity. Although the role of the PH domain in Vav function has been evaluated extensively, its precise role and whether it serves a distinct role in different Vav proteins remain unresolved. Additionally, the precise role of an adjacent cysteine-rich domain (CRD) in regulating DH domain function is also unclear. In this study, we evaluated the contribution of these putative protein-protein or protein-lipid interaction domains to Vav signaling and transforming activity. In contrast to previous observations, we found that the PH domain is critical for Vav transforming activity. Similarly, the CRD was also essential and served a function distinct from that of the PH domain. Although mutation of either domain reduced Vav membrane association, addition of plasma membrane targeting sequences to either the CRD or PH domain mutant proteins did not restore Vav transforming activity. This result contrasts with other Dbl family proteins, where a membrane targeting sequence alone was sufficient to restore the loss of function caused by mutation of the PH domain. Furthermore, green fluorescent protein fusion proteins containing the PH domain or CRD, or both, failed to target to the plasma membrane, suggesting that these two domains also serve regulatory functions independent of promoting membrane localization. Finally, we found that phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activation may promote Vav membrane association via phosphatidylinositol 3,4,5-triphosphate binding to the PH domain.


Asunto(s)
Proteínas Sanguíneas/química , Proteínas de Ciclo Celular , Cisteína/química , Fosfoproteínas/química , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/química , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas/metabolismo , Células 3T3 , Animales , Catálisis , Línea Celular , Membrana Celular/metabolismo , ADN Complementario/metabolismo , Eliminación de Gen , Genes Reporteros , Humanos , Ratones , Microscopía Confocal , Mutación , Fosfatos de Fosfatidilinositol/metabolismo , Mutación Puntual , Unión Proteica , Estructura Terciaria de Proteína , Proteínas Proto-Oncogénicas c-vav , Transducción de Señal , Fracciones Subcelulares/metabolismo , Transfección , Dominios Homologos src
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA