Investigation of the influence of clathrate hydrate crystals on the structuring of homeopathic high dilutions

High dilutions (HD) of drugs used in homeopathy are mostly too dilute to contain original drug molecules. But evidences support their specific biological and therapeutic effects. The reason behind this is thought to be water structure characteristic of the original drug. Spectroscopic studies indicate that the specific water structure in HDs can be resolved into free water molecules, hydrogen bonding strength of water hydroxyl, number of hydrogen bonds and clathrate hydrate crystals (CHC). HDs are prepared in EtOH water solution by serial dilution and mechanical agitation, and are called potencies. The objective of the present study is to further confirm the presence of CHCs in the two potencies of three drugs. Electronic spectra of the HDs of the potencies indicate two broad peaks and marked difference in intensities of absorption. Furior Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectra of the test potencies and their control show difference in intensity shift and contour shape of OH stretching and bending bands. All the experimental data indicate the presence of CHCs in varying amounts in the test potencies.

Collusion and entanglement in the therapy of a patient with multiple personalities.

S.'s therapy demonstrates some of the ways in which countertransference interferes with therapy of a case presenting with multiple personalities. Fascination with S.'s alter personalities and the desire to prove their genuineness, made her therapist search for them and then repeatedly invoke their appearance. Part of the reason was his inexperience with such cases that induced him to "play it by the book," and use "personality-centered procedures" (looking for a different part, giving it a name, speaking to it, etc.) that have yet to be scientifically validated, instead of adhering to the basic principles of psychotherapy. At a deeper level, however, his excessive preoccupation with S.'s personalities was one kind of collusion with her resistance to deal with the focal issue of her sexual ambivalence. Proof of this resistance also surfaced later as a motivated shift of focus in therapy, and a weakening of the therapeutic alliance. By the time this was evident, sabotage of therapy had already occurred.