Randomized trial of intracardiac echocardiography-guided slow pathway ablation.

PURPOSE: Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation of the slow pathway (SP) in atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) is highly effective; however, it may require prolonged fluoroscopy and RF time. We postulated that visualization of the SP region with intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) could decrease ablation time, minimize radiation exposure, and facilitate SP ablation compared to the standard, fluoroscopy-guided approach. METHODS: In our study, we randomized 91 patients undergoing electrophysiologic study and SP ablation for AVNRT into 2 groups: fluoroscopy-only (n = 48) or ICE-guided (n = 43) group. Crossover to ICE-guidance was allowed after 8 unsuccessful RF applications. RESULTS: Mapping plus ablation time (mean ± standard deviation: 18.8 ± 16.1 min vs 11.6 ± 15.0 min, p = 0.031), fluoroscopy time (median [interquartile range]: 4.9 [2.93-8.13] min vs. 1.8 [1.2-2.8] min, p < 0.001), and total ablation time (144 [104-196] s vs. 81 [60-159] s, p = 0.001) were significantly shorter in the ICE group. ICE-guidance was associated with reduced radiation exposure (13.2 [8.2-13.4] mGy vs. 3.7 [1.5-5.8] mGy, p < 0.001). The sum of delivered RF energy (3866 [2786-5656] Ws vs. 2283 [1694-4284] Ws, p = 0.002) and number of RF applications (8 [4.25-12.75] vs. 4 [2-7], p = 0.001) were also lower with ICE-guidance. Twelve (25%) patients crossed over to the ICE-guided group. All were treated successfully thereafter with similar number, time, and cumulative energy of RF applications compared to the ICE group. No recurrence occurred during the follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ICE-guidance during SP ablation significantly reduces mapping and ablation time, radiation exposure, and RF delivery in comparison to fluoroscopy-only procedures. Moreover, early switching to ICE-guided ablation seems to be an optimal choice in challenging cases.

Is adenosine useful for the identification of atrial fibrillation triggers?

INTRODUCTION: Both isoproterenol (Iso) and adenosine (Ado) are used to induce atrial fibrillation (AF) in the electrophysiology lab. However, the utility of Ado has not been systematically established. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare Ado to Iso for the induction of paroxysmal AF. METHODS: Forty patients (16 women; mean age, 60 ± 12 years) with paroxysmal AF, presenting for ablation were prospectively included of whom 36 (90%) received Ado (18-36 mg) and/or Iso (3-20 µg/min incremental dose) in a randomized order (26 [72%] received both drugs). RESULTS: AF was induced with Iso in 15 of 32 (47%) and with Ado in 12 of 30 (40%) patients (P = 0.9). Iso-triggered AF started from the left pulmonary veins (PVs) in 11 of 15 (73%), from the right PVs in 3 of 15 (20%), and from the coronary sinus (CS) in 1 of 15 (7%) cases. Ado-induced AF episodes originated from the left PVs in 6 of 12 (50%), from the right atrium (RA) in 4 of 12 (33%), and from the CS in 2 of 12 (17%) cases. Altogether, Iso-induced AF was more likely initiated from the PVs (93%) compared with Ado (50%) ( P = 0.02). Ado-induced non-PV triggers were not predictive of arrhythmia recurrence after PV isolation. CONCLUSION: Ado much more frequently induces non-PV triggers, especially from the RA. The clinical significance of these foci, however, is questionable.

Isolated left atrial posterior wall tachycardia.

A case of macroreentry tachycardia of the isolated posterior left atrium is presented after surgical and subsequent catheter ablation.

Role of triggering pulmonary veins in the maintenance of sustained paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Triggers from thoracic veins have been implicated not only in the initiation, but also in the perpetuation of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). To investigate their role we studied the distribution and stability of dominant frequencies (DFs) during PAF and the response to isolation of the triggering pulmonary vein (PV). METHODS AND RESULTS: Triggering structures inducing PAF were identified during isoproterenol challenge in 26 patients (15 males, 55 ± 8.5 years). During sustained PAF, sequential recordings were made with a decapolar circular mapping catheter from each PV and the left atrial posterior wall (LAPW), together with coronary sinus (CS) and right atrium (RA) recordings. DF was determined using fast Fourier transformation. Recordings were repeated after ≥15 minutes of PAF. Radiofrequency ablation was directed first at the triggering PVs. PAF initiated from the PVs in 24 patients and from RA in two. There was a significant frequency gradient from the triggering structure to the PVs, CS, LAPW, and RA (P < 0.0001). During the second recording, DF decreased at all sites (P < 0.02), but the frequency gradient remained unchanged. Despite isolation of the triggering PV, PAF continued in 53% of patients, although DF measured in the CS was lower. AF termination occurred with contralateral PV isolation in half of the remaining patients and further AF slowing was noted in the rest. CONCLUSIONS: Triggering structures harbor the fastest activity during sustained PAF pointing to their leading role in arrhythmia perpetuation. However, nontriggering PVs also seem to contribute to PAF maintenance.

Surgical technique and the mechanism of atrial tachycardia late after open heart surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Diverse atrial tachycardias (ATs) can develop after open heart surgery. The aim of our study was to examine the determinants of the mechanism of postoperative AT. METHODS AND RESULTS: One hundred patients with AT occurring at least 3 months after open heart surgery were studied. Patients were grouped according to the atrial incision applied at the time of surgery. During 127 electrophysiology procedures, 151 ATs were studied. Eighty-eight patients had cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI)-dependent atrial flutter (AFL), 49 patients had at least one non-CTI-dependent AFL and 11 patients had focal AT. While CTI-dependent AFL was equally prevalent across groups, the finding of a non-CTI-dependent AFL was progressively more common as more extensive atriotomy was applied (p < 0.001). Among patients who had right atrial (RA) operations, RA incisional tachycardia was the most common non-CTI-dependent circuit, while the finding of perimitral or left atrial (LA) roof-dependent AFL was associated with LA atriotomy (p = 0.002 and p = 0.041, respectively). After adjustment for possible confounders, surgical group remained independent predictor of non-CTI-dependent AFLs (p < 0.001). No predictor was identified for focal AT, which originated from typical predilection sites and in 36% from the vicinity of surgical scar. Radiofrequency ablation was highly effective for all ATs, but the recurrence rate of AFL and atrial fibrillation was high at 22% and 27%, respectively, during 19 ± 15 months of follow-up. CONCLUSION: While CTI-dependent AFL is the most common AT late after open heart surgery, atypical AFL becomes progressively more common with more extensive atriotomy. Right atrial incisional tachycardia is the dominant non-CTI-dependent AFL after opening of the RA, while a perimitral or roof-dependent LA circuit can be expected after LA operations.

Is there a relationship between complex fractionated atrial electrograms recorded during atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm fractionation?

BACKGROUND: Ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may require adjunctive methods of substrate modification. Both ablation-targeting complex fractionated atrial electrograms (CFAEs) recorded during AF and fractionated electrograms recorded during sinus rhythm (sinus rhythm fractionation [SRF]) have been described. However, the relationship of CFAEs with SRF is unclear. METHODS: Twenty patients (age 62 ± 9 years, 13 males) with persistent AF and 9 control subjects without organic heart disease or AF (age 36 ± 6 years, 4 males) underwent detailed CFAE and SRF left atrial electroanatomic maps. The overlap in left atrial regions with CFAEs and SRF was compared in the AF population, and the distribution of SRF was compared among patients with AF and normal controls. Propagation maps were analyzed to identify the activation patterns associated with SR fractionation. RESULTS: SRF (338 ± 150 points) and CFAE (418 ± 135 points) regions comprised 29% ± 14% and 25% ± 15% of the left atrial surface area, respectively. There was no significant correlation between SRF and CFAE maps (r = .2; P = NS). On comparing patients with AF and controls, no significant difference was found in the distribution of SRF between groups (P = .74). Regions of SRF overlapped areas of wave-front collision 75% ± 13% of the time. CONCLUSIONS: (1) There is little overlap between regions of CFAEs during AF and regions of SRF measured in the time domain or the frequency domain, (2) the majority of SRF appears to occur in regions with wave-front collision, (3) the distribution of SRF is similar in patients with AF and normal controls, suggesting that this may not have an important role in AF maintenance and may not be a suitable ablation target.

Electrogram analysis at the His bundle region and the proximal coronary sinus as a tool to predict left atrial origin of focal atrial tachycardias.

AIMS: Early activation at the His bundle (HB) region or proximal coronary sinus (CS) during focal atrial tachycardias (FATs) often necessitates biatrial mapping. Analysis of CS electrograms (EGMs) consisting of a near-field (N) component from CS musculature and a far-field (F) component from left atrial (LA) myocardium can uncover LA activation preceding right atrial (RA) activation. A similar pattern might be observed at the HB. METHODS AND RESULTS: Eight patients underwent RA and LA pacing testing the hypothesis that N and F components originating from the RA and LA septum are present in the HB atrial EGM (Pacing group). In this group N preceded F (N-F sequence) in all, while F preceded N (F-N sequence) in seven of eight patients during RA and LA pacing, respectively. Twenty-seven patients with FAT demonstrating earliest activation at the HB or proximal CS during limited RA mapping were also studied (FAT group). Two observers analysed the EGMs at the earliest site during FAT. They found an N-F sequence in 17 (94%) and 16 (89%) of 18 RA FAT and an F-N sequence in seven (78%) and eight (89%) of nine LA FAT, respectively. The F-N sequence predicted the need for LA access with a sensitivity of 78 and 89% and a specificity of 94 and 89%. CONCLUSION: Near-field and F components from RA and LA activation can be identified in the HB atrial EGM. Earliest atrial EGM analysis at the HB or CS can predict the need for LA access during FAT ablation.