Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 19(3): 244-251, 2020 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32414576

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent studies showed that sequential selective transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and portal vein embolization (PVE) provided better future liver remnant (FLR) regeneration rate and disease-free survival following surgery compared with PVE alone. The present study aimed to clarify whether preoperative sequential TACE and PVE before right hemihepatectomy can reduce postoperative hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence and improve long-term disease-free and overall survival. METHODS: Recurrence and survival outcomes were retrospectively evaluated in 205 patients with HCC who underwent right hemihepatectomy by a single surgeon from November 1993 to November 2017. Patients were divided into four groups according to the procedure performed before the surgery: sequential TACE and PVE (TACE-PVE), PVE-only, TACE-only, or naïve control groups. The baseline patient and tumor characteristics, postoperative outcomes, recurrence-free survival and overall survival were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline patient and tumor characteristics upon diagnosis were similar in all four groups, while sequential TACE and PVE were well tolerated. The TACE-PVE group had a higher mean increase in percentage FLR volume compared with that of the PVE-only group (17.46% ± 6.63% vs. 12.14% ± 5.93%; P = 0.001). The TACE-PVE group had significantly better overall and disease-free survival rates compared with the other groups (both P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Sequential TACE and PVE prior to surgery can be an effective therapeutic strategy for patients with HCC scheduled for major hepatic resection. The active application of preoperative sequential TACE and PVE for HCC would allow more patients with marginal FLR volume to become candidates for major hepatic resection by promoting compensatory FLR hypertrophy without the deterioration of basal hepatic functional reserve or tumor progression.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Quimioembolización Terapéutica , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Vena Porta , Adulto , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Terapia Combinada , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Aceite Etiodizado/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hepatectomía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Regeneración Hepática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Periodo Preoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Liver Transpl ; 24(7): 932-945, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29710388

RESUMEN

Both sorafenib and mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor (mTORi) have antitumor effects. This study aimed to evaluate their antitumor effects in liver transplantation (LT) recipients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence. We performed a laboratory study using sorafenib and mTORi and subsequently validated their survival benefit in a clinical LT setting. In the laboratory study, the HepG2.2.15 liver tumor cell line and 5 patient-derived graft HCC cell lines were used for in vitro cytotoxic studies. After treatment with everolimus and sorafenib, cell viability and apoptosis assays revealed noticeable cytotoxic effects with individual agents and augmented effects by combination therapy. An in vivo mouse study also demonstrated similar cytotoxic outcomes. In the clinical study including 232 LT recipients with HCC recurrence, the 3-month medication drop-out rate was 35.6% for sorafenib administration and 23.5% for mTORi administration. Postrecurrence survival rates were not different according to sorafenib administration (P = 0.17) but were significantly improved following mTORi administration (P < 0.001). In mTORi subgroups with and without sorafenib, there was no difference in the overall postrecurrence patient survival period (P = 0.26), indicating an absence of synergistic or additional antitumor effect from sorafenib. The median progression-free and overall survival period was 6.4 and 11.8 months, respectively, after sorafenib administration. Time of tumor recurrence and use of mTORi were independent risk factors. In conclusion, our laboratory study demonstrated synergistic antitumor effects of sorafenib and mTORi, but this was not reproduced in our clinical LT study. Our clinical result of mTORi administration showed improved postrecurrence survival, thus administering mTORi in LT recipients with HCC recurrence appears worthwhile. However, the antitumor effect of sorafenib on posttransplant recurrence was not determined in this retrospective study, thus requiring further studies with early start of sorafenib administration. Liver Transplantation 24 932-945 2018. © 2018 AASLD.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Trasplante de Hígado , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/tratamiento farmacológico , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Animales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/farmacología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Supervivencia Celular/efectos de los fármacos , Femenino , Células Hep G2 , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Ratones Endogámicos NOD , Ratones Desnudos , Ratones SCID , Persona de Mediana Edad , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/mortalidad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Estudios Retrospectivos , Análisis de Supervivencia , Factores de Tiempo , Ensayos Antitumor por Modelo de Xenoinjerto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA