Guidewire-catheter induced hydrodissection to assist radiofrequency ablation for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma with iodized oil retention in patients with failed artificial ascites due to perihepatic adhesion.

PURPOSE: We aimed to evaluate the usefulness of guidewire-catheter induced hydrodissection (GIH) to assist radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for subcapsular hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with iodized oil retention in patients with failed artificial ascites due to perihepatic adhesion. METHODS: This retrospective study included 17 patients with small subcapsular HCC ineligible for ultrasonography-guided RFA who received RFA under guidance of fluoroscopy and cone-beam computed tomography immediately after iodized oil transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) between April 2011 and January 2016. In the study patients, creation of artificial ascites to protect the perihepatic structures failed due to perihepatic adhesion and GIH was attempted to separate the perihepatic structures from the ablation zone. The technical success rate of GIH, technique efficacy of RFA with GIH, local tumor progression (LTP), peritoneal seeding, and complications were evaluated. RESULTS: The technical success rate of GIH was 88.24% (15 of 17 patients). Technique efficacy was achieved in all 15 patients receiving RFA with GIH. During an average follow-up period of 48.1 months, LTP developed in three patients. Cumulative LTP rates at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years were 13.3%, 20.6%, 20.6%, and 20.6%, respectively. No patient had peritoneal seeding. Two of the 15 patients receiving RFA with GIH had a CIRSE grade 3 liver abscess, but none had complications associated with thermal injury to the diaphragm or abdominal wall near the ablation zone. CONCLUSION: GIH can be a useful method to assist RFA for subcapsular HCC with iodized oil retention in patients with failed artificial ascites due to perihepatic adhesion.

Efficacy of RECIST and mRECIST criteria as prognostic factors in patients undergoing repeated iodized oil chemoembolization of intermediate stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Given that transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is usually a repeated procedure for treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), repeated radiologic response assessments rather than a single time point assessment may have different clinical implications through the repeated course of TACE. PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of RECIST and mRECIST criteria as a survival predictor across early time points after repeated TACE of HCC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Ninety-eight patients with intermediate stage HCC received repeated iodized oil TACE. Treatment response was assessed according to RECIST and mRECIST criteria at 1, 3, and 6 months after initial TACE. Cox proportional model was used for survival analysis and the predicting power of each time point response was evaluated with C-statistics and time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Inter-method agreement was assessed with the κ coefficient. RESULTS: mRECIST was not applicable in 15 patients because of patchy uptake of iodized oil after TACE. On multivariate analysis, responders at 6 months by RECIST, responders at 3 months, and 6 months by mRECIST showed better survival than non-responders (P < 0.05). Predicting power of response criteria improved over time and mRECIST at 6 months showed the best performance. The degree of agreements was poor or fair between RECIST and mRECIST. CONCLUSION: mRECIST predicted long-term survival as early as 3 months after TACE of intermediate stage HCC. The predicting power of the uni-dimensional response criteria tended to be stronger over time.

Postbiopsy arterioportal fistula in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: clinical significance in transarterial chemoembolization.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine, retrospectively, the frequency of postbiopsy arterioportal fistula in hepatocellular carcinoma and its significance in transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-one patients who underwent percutaneous liver biopsy for diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma were referred for TACE. The control population comprised 161 patients referred during the same period who underwent TACE without biopsy. We determined that an arterioportal fistula was present by opacification of the portal vein during the arterial phase of angiography or by opacification with iodized oil during TACE. We considered hepatocellular carcinoma to be responsive to TACE when the sum of iodized oil retention in the tumor and a low-attenuation area on CT was greater than 50% of tumor size. We compared the frequency of arterioportal fistula and the rate of tumor response to TACE in both groups and also evaluated possible factors associated with postbiopsy arterioportal fistula, such as age, sex, Child-Pugh score, tumor size, average number of needle passes, average distance that the needle traversed normal liver before reaching the mass, and average interval between biopsy and TACE. RESULTS: Twenty-three (56.1%) of 41 patients in the biopsy group and 19 (11.8%) of 161 patients in the control group had an arterioportal fistula (p < 0.001). The rate of tumor response to TACE was 87.8% (36/41) in the biopsy group and 87.0% (140/161) in the control group (p = 0.5932). Of the possible related factors, only tumor size correlated negatively with the occurrence of arterioportal fistula. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous liver biopsy in hepatocellular carcinoma patients apparently increases the rate of arterioportal fistula but does not seem to affect the rate of tumor response to TACE.