RESUMEN
Tumor immunology has changed the landscape of cancer treatment. Yet, not all patients benefit as cancer immune responsiveness (CIR) remains a limitation in a considerable proportion of cases. The multifactorial determinants of CIR include the genetic makeup of the patient, the genomic instability central to cancer development, the evolutionary emergence of cancer phenotypes under the influence of immune editing, and external modifiers such as demographics, environment, treatment potency, co-morbidities and cancer-independent alterations including immune homeostasis and polymorphisms in the major and minor histocompatibility molecules, cytokines, and chemokines. Based on the premise that cancer is fundamentally a disorder of the genes arising within a cell biologic process, whose deviations from normality determine the rules of engagement with the host's response, the Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer (SITC) convened a task force of experts from various disciplines including, immunology, oncology, biophysics, structural biology, molecular and cellular biology, genetics, and bioinformatics to address the complexity of CIR from a holistic view. The task force was launched by a workshop held in San Francisco on May 14-15, 2018 aimed at two preeminent goals: 1) to identify the fundamental questions related to CIR and 2) to create an interactive community of experts that could guide scientific and research priorities by forming a logical progression supported by multiple perspectives to uncover mechanisms of CIR. This workshop was a first step toward a second meeting where the focus would be to address the actionability of some of the questions identified by working groups. In this event, five working groups aimed at defining a path to test hypotheses according to their relevance to human cancer and identifying experimental models closest to human biology, which include: 1) Germline-Genetic, 2) Somatic-Genetic and 3) Genomic-Transcriptional contributions to CIR, 4) Determinant(s) of Immunogenic Cell Death that modulate CIR, and 5) Experimental Models that best represent CIR and its conversion to an immune responsive state. This manuscript summarizes the contributions from each group and should be considered as a first milestone in the path toward a more contemporary understanding of CIR. We appreciate that this effort is far from comprehensive and that other relevant aspects related to CIR such as the microbiome, the individual's recombined T cell and B cell receptors, and the metabolic status of cancer and immune cells were not fully included. These and other important factors will be included in future activities of the taskforce. The taskforce will focus on prioritization and specific actionable approach to answer the identified questions and implementing the collaborations in the follow-up workshop, which will be held in Houston on September 4-5, 2019.
Asunto(s)
Inmunoterapia , Neoplasias/terapia , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Comités Consultivos , Animales , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/inmunología , Congresos como Asunto , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Humanos , Oncología Médica/organización & administración , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/inmunología , Sociedades Médicas/organización & administración , Resultado del Tratamiento , Microambiente Tumoral/genéticaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: VEGF promotes an immunosuppressive microenvironment and contributes to immune checkpoint inhibitor resistance in cancer. We aimed to assess the activity of the VEGF receptor tyrosine-kinase inhibitor axitinib plus the anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor pembrolizumab in patients with sarcoma. METHODS: This single-centre, single-arm, phase 2 trial was undertaken at a tertiary care academic medical centre in Miami, FL, USA, and participants were recruited from all over the USA and internationally. Patients were eligible if they were aged 16 years or older, and had histologically confirmed advanced or metastatic sarcomas, including alveolar soft-part sarcoma (ASPS); measurable disease with one site amenable to repeated biopsies; an ECOG performance status of 0-1; and progressive disease after previous treatment with at least one line of systemic therapy (unless no standard treatment existed or the patient declined therapy). The first five patients were enrolled in a lead-in cohort and were given axitinib 5 mg orally twice daily and pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously for 30 min on day 8 and every 3 weeks for cycles of 6 weeks for up to 2 years. Thereafter, patients received escalating doses of axitinib (2-10 mg) plus flat dose pembrolizumab according to the schedule above. The primary endpoint was 3-month progression-free survival. All patients were evaluable for survival and safety analyses. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02636725, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between April 19, 2016, and Feb 7, 2018, of 36 patients assessed for eligibility, 33 (92%) were enrolled and given study treatment (intention-to-treat population and safety population), 12 (36%) of whom had ASPS. With a median follow-up of 14·7 months (IQR 10·1-19·1), 3-month progression-free survival for all evaluable patients was 65·6% (95% CI 46·6-79·3). For patients with ASPS, 3-month progression-free survival was 72·7% (95% CI 37·1-90·3). The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events included hypertension (five [15%] of 33 patients), autoimmune toxicities (five [15%]), nausea or vomiting (two [6%]), and seizures (two [6%]). Serious treatment-related adverse events occurred in seven (21%) patients, including autoimmune colitis, transaminitis, pneumothorax, haemoptysis, seizures, and hypertriglyceridemia. There were no treatment-related deaths. INTERPRETATION: Axitinib plus pembrolizumab has manageable toxicity and preliminary activity in patients with advanced sarcomas, particularly patients with ASPS, warranting further investigation in randomised controlled trials. FUNDING: Merck, Pfizer, American Cancer Society, and Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Terapia Recuperativa , Sarcoma de Parte Blanda Alveolar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Axitinib/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias Encefálicas/secundario , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Sarcoma de Parte Blanda Alveolar/patología , Neoplasias de los Tejidos Blandos/patología , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
Numerous natural compounds have been extensively investigated for their potential for cancer prevention over the decades. Curcumin, from Curcuma longa, is a highly promising natural compound that can be potentially used for chemoprevention of multiple cancers. Curcumin modulates multiple molecular pathways involved in the lengthy carcinogenesis process to exert its chemopreventive effects through several mechanisms: promoting apoptosis, inhibiting survival signals, scavenging reactive oxidative species (ROS), and reducing the inflammatory cancer microenvironment. Curcumin fulfills the characteristics for an ideal chemopreventive agent with its low toxicity, affordability, and easy accessibility. Nonetheless, the clinical application of curcumin is currently compromised by its poor bioavailability. Here, we review the potential of curcumin in cancer prevention, its molecular targets, and mechanisms of action. Finally, we suggest specific recommendations to improve its efficacy and bioavailability for clinical applications.
Asunto(s)
Anticarcinógenos/uso terapéutico , Curcumina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Animales , HumanosRESUMEN
Curcumin as an anticancer agent was investigated in regards to its ability to regulate the switching of cancer cells from survival to necrotic cell death. At higher concentrations, curcumin induced ROS production leading to JNK and p38 phosphorylation in DU-145 prostate cancer cells. Of the MAP kinases, ERK or p38/JNK were phosphorylated earlier during curcumin treatment, and were responsible for curcumin-induced cell survival at early time of treatment with the help of phosphorylated Akt, while significant amounts of ROS production in later periods stimulated cell death with caspase degradation. In addition to autophagic signaling, necrosis was dominant with little apoptotic cell death. Caspase activation was completely prohibited by procaspase degradation, which contributed to curcumin-induced early necrosis. At the later incubation period (24h), cytotoxicity caused by curcumin peaked, at which time survival or proliferation signals, such as phosphorylated Akt and phosphorylated ERK, was almost completely diminished. Curcumin-induced ROS were shown to function, biphasically depending on the incubation period; facilitating survival, in the earlier incubation period, and necrotic death in the later. Based on all of these results, we concluded that curcumin contributes to a complex signaling network, affecting cell survival and necrotic cell death, which in turn could inhibit apoptotic cell death.