Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Bases de datos
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31658965

RESUMEN

The aim of this work was to describe optimized dosing regimens of ceftolozane-tazobactam for critically ill patients receiving continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). We conducted a prospective observational pharmacokinetic study in adult critically ill patients with clinical indications for ceftolozane-tazobactam and CVVHDF. Unbound drug concentrations were measured from serial prefilter blood, postfilter blood, and ultrafiltrate samples by a chromatographic assay. Population pharmacokinetic modeling and dosing simulations were performed using Pmetrics. A four-compartment pharmacokinetic model adequately described the data from six patients. The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) extraction ratios for ceftolozane and tazobactam were 0.76 ± 0.08 and 0.73 ± 0.1, respectively. The mean ± SD sieving coefficients were 0.94 ± 0.24 and 1.08 ± 0.30, respectively. Model-estimated CVVHDF clearance rates were 2.7 ± 0.8 and 3.0 ± 0.6 liters/h, respectively. Residual non-CVVHDF clearance rates were 0.6 ± 0.5 and 3.3 ± 0.9 liters/h, respectively. In the initial 24 h, doses as low as 0.75 g every 8 h enabled cumulative fractional response of ≥85% for empirical coverage against Pseudomonas aeruginosa, considering a 40% fT>MIC (percentage of time the free drug concentration was above the MIC) target. For 100% fT>MIC, doses of at least 1.5 g every 8 h were required. The median (interquartile range) steady-state trough ceftolozane concentrations for simulated regimens of 1.5 g and 3.0 g every 8 h were 28 (21 to 42) and 56 (42 to 84) mg/liter, respectively. The corresponding tazobactam concentrations were 6.1 (5.5 to 6.7) and 12.1 (11.0 to 13.4) mg/liter, respectively. We suggest a front-loaded regimen with a single 3.0-g loading dose followed by 0.75 g every 8 h for critically ill patients undergoing CVVHDF with study blood and dialysate flow rates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Cefalosporinas/farmacocinética , Cefalosporinas/uso terapéutico , Hemodiafiltración/métodos , Tazobactam/farmacocinética , Tazobactam/uso terapéutico , Lesión Renal Aguda/tratamiento farmacológico , Lesión Renal Aguda/microbiología , Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Cefalosporinas/administración & dosificación , Intervalos de Confianza , Terapia de Reemplazo Renal Continuo , Enfermedad Crítica , Humanos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Estudios Prospectivos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/efectos de los fármacos , Pseudomonas aeruginosa/patogenicidad , Tazobactam/administración & dosificación
2.
Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther ; 17(3): 201-210, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30668931

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: The intravenous (IV) formulation of fosfomycin has been re-introduced in clinical practice mainly to overcome treatment failures against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Appropriate dosing schedules of the IV formulation have not yet been established. Areas covered: The mechanism of action and resistance development, commercial IV formulations, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, IV dosing regimens for the treatment of MDR infections along with efficacy and safety issues were reviewed. Data regarding specific MDR pathogens, daily doses and patients' outcomes, gaps in the current literature, and in progress research agenda are presented. Expert opinion: The doses of fosfomycin IV range between 12 and 24 grams/day depending on the severity of infection. The efficacy and safety of the commonly administered doses have been shown mainly in observational non-comparative trials. The optimal dose ensuring maximal efficacy with minimal toxicity along with the most appropriate co-administered antibiotic(s) need further evaluation. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter associated with maximum efficacy has not yet been established, although, the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for the free unbound fraction of fosfomycin versus the MIC (fAUC/MIC) may be linked to optimal treatment. RCTs and other comparative studies are underway to address gaps of knowledge in adult patients and neonates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Infecciones Bacterianas/tratamiento farmacológico , Fosfomicina/administración & dosificación , Administración Intravenosa , Adulto , Antibacterianos/farmacocinética , Antibacterianos/farmacología , Área Bajo la Curva , Infecciones Bacterianas/microbiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Farmacorresistencia Bacteriana Múltiple , Fosfomicina/farmacocinética , Fosfomicina/farmacología , Humanos , Recién Nacido , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA