Intrathecal magnesium as analgesic adjuvant for spinal anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy and safety of intrathecal magnesium as analgesic adjuvant has been tested by several clinical trials in recent years. We performed a meta-analysis of the available literature. METHODS: Randomized clinical trials comparing a 50 to 100 mg dose of intrathecal magnesium sulfate versus placebo in addition to an intrathecal local anesthetic and/or opiate for a below-umbilicus procedure were included. Medline, LILACS, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar databases were searched. A random analysis was performed and heterogeneity was tested for. The size of the effect for quantitative outcomes was calculated as standard mean difference (SMD, neutral=0); and as odds ratio (OR, neutral=1) for dichotomous outcomes. RESULTS: Twelve studies totaling 817 patients were included. The "time to first analgesia request" was at least 35 minutes longer when intrathecal magnesium was included in the intervention (SDM 0.94, 95%CI 0.51 to 1.37, P<0.001). The "onset time to sensory block" (SDM 0.64, 95%CI 0.15 to 1.12, P=0.01) and the "time to maximal motor block" (SDM 0.97, 95%CI 0.28 to 1.67, P=0.006) were 2.4 minutes slower with intrathecal magnesium. There was no difference in "time to full motor recovery, incidence of pruritus, postoperative nausea and vomiting, bradicardia, low blood pressure and urinary retention". No cases of respiratory depression or neurotoxicity were recorded in these studies. CONCLUSION: The inclusion of 50 to 100 mg of intrathecal magnesium in a spinal anesthetic prolongs opiate analgesia duration; no safety concerns have been identified by the included clinical studies but additional evidence is advised.

[Septic shock. Update of treatment using hypertonic saline and antidiuretic hormone-vasopressin]. / Shock séptico. Actualización en tratamiento con suero salino hipertónico y hormona antidiurética-vasopresina.

Safety in the use of small volumes of hypertonic saline solution for hypovolaemic shock and in the treatment of intracranial hypertension has been demonstrated in studies in the field of resuscitation. There is little experience of this for septic shock in humans. Beneficial immunomodulatory effects have been detected in pre-clinical studies. Interactions with the pituitary-adrenal axis and with the secretion of anti-diuretic hormone are varied and suggestive, but are not sufficiently understood. On the other hand, vasopressin has cardiovascular, osmoregulatory, and coagulation effects, and also acts on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis. There is a relative deficit of vasopressin in septic shock. Its use in these patients does not seem to have any advantages as regards mortality, but may be beneficial in patients at risk from acute renal failure, or those who receive corticosteroids. Terlipressin is a vasopressin analogue that has also been studied. The synergy between vasopressin and hypertonic saline is a hypothesis that is mainly supported in pre-clinical studies. The use of hypertonic saline solution in septic shock, although promising, is still experimental, and must be restricted to the field of controlled clinical trials.