Beneficial Effects of Remote Medical Care for Patients with Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasia during the COVID-19 Pandemic.

BACKGROUND: Hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) needs high-quality care and multidisciplinary management. During the COVID-19 pandemic, most non-urgent clinical activities for HHT outpatients were suspended. We conducted an analytical observational cohort study to evaluate whether medical and psychological support, provided through remote consultation during the COVID-19 pandemic, could reduce the complications of HHT. METHODS: A structured regimen of remote consultations, conducted by either video-calls, telephone calls, or e-mails, was provided by a multidisciplinary group of physicians to a set of patients of our HHT center. The outcomes considered were: number of emergency room visits/hospitalizations, need of blood transfusions, need of iron supplementation, worsening of epistaxis, and psychological status. RESULTS: The study included 45 patients who received remote assistance for a total of eight months. During this period, 9 patients required emergency room visits, 6 needed blood transfusions, and 24 needed iron supplementation. This was not different from what was registered among the same 45 patients in the same period of the previous year. Remote care also resulted in better management of epistaxis and improved quality of life, with the mean epistaxis severity score and the Euro-Quality of Life-Visual Analogue Scale that were significantly better at the end than at the beginning of the study. DISCUSSION: Remote medical care might be a valid support for HHT subjects during periods of suspended outpatient surveillance, like the COVID-19 pandemic.

Radon-enriched hot spring water therapy for upper and lower respiratory tract inflammation.

Background Radon-222-enriched hot spring therapy, which is characterized by a safe level of radioactivity, is used for the treatment of rheumatic disorders, and its efficacy has already been studied in several clinical trials. Radon-water inhalation therapy for the treatment of upper and lower airway inflammatory diseases is used in many hot springs centers. However, its application has not been reviewed to date. Methods We systematically searched the PubMed and Scopus databases for clinical trials published in the last 20 years in which objective parameters of upper and lower airway function had been tested before and after radon-enriched inhalation treatment. Results Four prospective studies were found: 1 asthma trial, 1 placebo-controlled chronic rhinosinusitis trial, 1 upper respiratory tract inflammation with nasal obstruction trial, and 1 case-control allergic rhinitis trial. Patients were treated with nasal inhalations of radon-enriched water for 12 to 28 days and were assessed at baseline and after therapy. After 2 weeks of treatment, nasal resistance decreased, flow increased, mucociliary clearance was enhanced, ciliated-to-muciparous cell ratio increased, and %FEV1 increased in asthmatic patients. Conclusion Radon-enriched inhalation therapy improves objective indicators of nasal function in allergic rhinitis and chronic rhinosinusitis, and causes relief of pulmonary obstruction in asthma.

A prospective open-label study to assess the efficacy and safety of a herbal medicinal product (Sinupret) in patients with acute rhinosinusitis.

AIMS: We present a multicenter, prospective, open-label study to assess the efficacy and safety of a phytomedicine. The aim of the research was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 14 days of treatment with Sinupret for acute rhinosinusitis. Sinupret is a herbal preparation used to restore and maintain the physiological function of the membranes in the sinus cavity. METHODS: Sixty patients with acute rhinosinusitis based on the EPOS guidelines were enrolled in the study. Thirty patients were treated with Sinupret Forte, while 30 patients were treated with intranasal fluticasone furoate. The criteria for the evaluation of efficacy were the major symptom scores according to the investigator and the Health-Related Quality of Life score. The criteria used to evaluate safety were the number of patients with adverse events, the patients' vital signs, and laboratory safety. RESULTS: All patients considered showed significant improvements in symptoms. Among the patients treated with Sinupret, none had an adverse event, while 3 patients treated with fluticasone furoate had minor adverse events. The patients' vital signs and laboratory values were normal. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that this phytomedicinal preparation has a significant level of efficacy in acute rhinosinusitis and that treatment is safe.