Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 26
Filtrar
Más filtros

Bases de datos
País/Región como asunto
Tipo del documento
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38483414

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of the present study was to determine if imaging findings of unilateral lumbar nerve root compression (ULNRC) impact performance on a coordinated motor performance task and to determine if there were correlations between motor performance and self-reported clinical measures. METHODS: People with back pain (N = 45) were stratified into 3 groups based on combinations of: lumbar imaging; and clinical presentation for ULNRC. Group 1 included people with imaging of lumbar nerve root compression, who presented with neurological deficit. Group 2 people demonstrated imaging evidence of nerve compression, without motor, sensory or reflex change. Group 3 participants possessed only degenerative changes on lumbar imaging films, and were neurologically intact. Performance measures included behavioral and kinematic variables from an established lower limb Fitts' Task requiring movements to targets of different difficulties. Self-reported measures of disability, function and pain were collected. Analysis of variance for between and within group variables were conducted, and Pearson correlation compared performance with self-reported measures. RESULTS: All groups yielded main effects for movement time with increasing task difficulty as predicted by Fitts' Law. A main effect revealed Group 1 participants performed less accurately than Group 3 participants. Positive correlations were predominantly found between self-report measures and motor performance for Group 2 and Group 3. CONCLUSION: Imaging, and self-reported measures alone did not predict function, however, Fitts' task performance accuracy effectively differentiated groups.

2.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 66(2): 107-117, 2022 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36275079

RESUMEN

Background: Non-pharmacologic treatment, including chiropractic care, is now recommended instead of opioid prescriptions as the initial management of chronic spine pain by clinical practice guidelines. Chiropractic care, commonly including spinal manipulation, has been temporally associated with reduced opioid prescription in veterans with spine pain. Purpose: To determine if chiropractic management including spinal manipulation was associated with decreased pain or opioid usage in financially disadvantaged individuals utilizing opioid medications and diagnosed with musculoskeletal conditions. Methods: A retrospective analysis of quality assurance data from a publicly funded healthcare facility was conducted. Measures included numeric pain scores of spine and extremity regions across three time points, opioid utilization, demographics, and care modalities. Results: Pain and opioid use significantly decreased concomitant with a course of chiropractic care. Conclusions: A publicly funded course of chiropractic care temporally coincided with statistically and clinically significant decreases in pain and opioid usage in a financially disadvantaged inner-city population.


Contexte: Conformément aux directives de pratique clinique, un traitement non pharmacologique, notamment des soins chiropratiques, à la place de prescriptions d'opioïdes est désormais recommandé dans le traitement initial de la douleur chronique à la colonne vertébrale. Les soins chiropratiques, qui comprennent habituellement la manipulation vertébrale, ont été liés de manière provisoire à une consommation réduite d'opioïdes sur ordonnance chez les vétérans souffrant de douleurs à la colonne vertébrale. Objectif: Déterminer si un traitement chiropratique, y compris la manipulation vertébrale, était lié à une diminution de la douleur ou de la consommation d'opioïdes chez les personnes défavorisées sur le plan financier utilisant des médicaments à base d'opioïdes et souffrant de problèmes musculosquelettiques. Méthodologie: Une analyse rétrospective des données sur l'assurance de la qualité provenant d'un établissement de soins de santé financé par l'État a été menée. Les mesures portaient sur des résultats numériques de la douleur à la colonne vertébrale et des extrémités des membres à trois moments différents, la consommation d'opioïdes, des données démographiques et les modes de soins. Résultats: La douleur et la consommation d'opioïdes ont sensiblement diminué dans le cadre de soins chiropratiques. Conclusions: Une diminution importante de la douleur et de la consommation d'opioïdes observée de façon statistique et clinique a coïncidé de manière provisoire avec des soins chiropratiques financés par l'État dans un groupe de personnes défavorisées sur le plan financier vivant au centre-ville.

3.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 45(3): 171-178, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35907658

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine whether chiropractic clinicians modulate spinal manipulation (SM) thrust characteristics based on visual perception of simulated human silhouette attributes. METHODS: We performed a cross-sectional within-participant design with 8 experienced chiropractors. During each trial, participants observed a human-shaped life-sized silhouette of a mock patient and delivered an SM thrust on a low-fidelity thoracic spine model based on their visual perception. Silhouettes varied on the following 3 factors: apparent sex (male or female silhouette), height (short, average, tall), and body mass index (BMI) (underweight, healthy, obese). Each combination was presented 6 times for a total of 108 trials in random order. Outcome measures included peak thrust force, thrust duration, peak preload force, peak acceleration, time to peak acceleration, and rate of force application. A 3-way repeated measures analysis of variance model was used to for each variable, followed by Tukey's honestly significant difference on significant interactions. RESULTS: Peak thrust force was reduced when apparent sex of the presented silhouette was female (F1,7 = 5.70, P = .048). Thrust duration was largely invariant, except that a BMI by height interaction revealed a longer duration occurred for healthy tall participants than healthy short participants (F4,28 = 4.34, P = .007). Compared to an image depicting obese BMI, an image appearing underweight lead to reduced peak acceleration (F2,5 = 6.756, P = .009). Clinician time to peak acceleration was reduced in short compared to tall silhouettes (t7 = 2.20, P = .032). CONCLUSION: Visual perception of simulated human silhouette attributes, including apparent sex, height, and BMI, influenced SM dose characteristics through both kinetic and kinematic measures. The results suggest that visual information from mock patients affects the decision-making of chiropractic clinicians delivering SM thrusts.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Manipulación Espinal , Quiropráctica/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Obesidad/terapia , Delgadez
4.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 35(5): 1075-1084, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35253731

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Osteoarthritis (OA) is one of the most prevalent and disabling musculoskeletal diseases worldwide. There is preliminary evidence from experimental studies and consensus documents that chiropractic management may alleviate spine and/or extremity OA related pain in the short term. OBJECTIVE: This research explores the potential relationship of a pragmatic course of care, including soft tissue therapy, spinal manipulation, and other treatments commonly delivered by chiropractors, to spine and extremity pain in patients with OA. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from the chiropractic program at a publicly funded healthcare facility was conducted. The primary outcome measures for patients diagnosed with spine and/or extremity OA (n= 76) were numeric pain scores of each spinal and extremity region at baseline and discharge, and a change score was determined. RESULTS: Statistically significant improvements that exceed a clinically meaningful difference in pain numeric rating scale scores were demonstrated by point change reductions from baseline to discharge visits. Change scores exceeding a minimally clinically important difference of "2-points" were present in the sacroiliac (-2.91), extremity (-2.84), cervical (-2.73), thoracic (-2.61), and lumbar (-2.59) regions. CONCLUSION: Patients diagnosed with OA in a socioeconomically disadvantaged community demonstrated reductions in mean pain scores in both a clinically meaningful and statistically significant manner concurrent with a course of chiropractic care.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Manipulación Quiropráctica , Dolor Musculoesquelético , Osteoartritis , Canadá , Atención a la Salud , Humanos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Osteoartritis/terapia , Dimensión del Dolor , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento
5.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 45(9): 633-640, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37294217

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe patient demographics and pain changes for women over the course of care in a chiropractic program. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of a prospective quality assurance database from the Mount Carmel Clinic (MCC) in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. Pain scores were reported on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale. Baseline and discharge Numeric Rating Scale scores were compared for each spinal and extremity region through Wilcoxon signed rank tests to determine if clinically meaningful or statistically significant differences were present. RESULTS: The sample population attained was 348 primarily middle-aged (mean = 43.0, SD = 14.96) women with obesity (body mass index = 31.3 kg/m2, SD = 7.89) referred to the MCC chiropractic program by their primary care physician (65.2%) for an average of 15.6 (SD = 18.49) treatments. Clinically meaningful median baseline to discharge changes in pain by spine region were observed (Cervical = -2, Thoracic = -2, Lumbar = -3, Sacroiliac = -3), each of which yielded statistical significance (P < .001). CONCLUSION: This retrospective analysis found that the MCC chiropractic program serves middle-aged women with obesity experiencing socioeconomic challenges. Pain reductions were reported, regardless of the region of complaint, temporally associated with a course of chiropractic care.


Asunto(s)
Dolor de la Región Lumbar , Persona de Mediana Edad , Humanos , Femenino , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Tratamiento Conservador , Estudios Transversales , Obesidad , Factores Socioeconómicos
6.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 29(1): 8, 2021 02 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33596925

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A small proportion of chiropractors, osteopaths, and other manual medicine providers use spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) to manage non-musculoskeletal disorders. However, the efficacy and effectiveness of these interventions to prevent or treat non-musculoskeletal disorders remain controversial. OBJECTIVES: We convened a Global Summit of international scientists to conduct a systematic review of the literature to determine the efficacy and effectiveness of SMT for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of non-musculoskeletal disorders. GLOBAL SUMMIT: The Global Summit took place on September 14-15, 2019 in Toronto, Canada. It was attended by 50 researchers from 8 countries and 28 observers from 18 chiropractic organizations. At the summit, participants critically appraised the literature and synthesized the evidence. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health, and the Index to Chiropractic Literature from inception to May 15, 2019 using subject headings specific to each database and free text words relevant to manipulation/manual therapy, effectiveness, prevention, treatment, and non-musculoskeletal disorders. Eligible for review were randomized controlled trials published in English. The methodological quality of eligible studies was assessed independently by reviewers using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) criteria for randomized controlled trials. We synthesized the evidence from articles with high or acceptable methodological quality according to the Synthesis without Meta-Analysis (SWiM) Guideline. The final risk of bias and evidence tables were reviewed by researchers who attended the Global Summit and 75% (38/50) had to approve the content to reach consensus. RESULTS: We retrieved 4997 citations, removed 1123 duplicates and screened 3874 citations. Of those, the eligibility of 32 articles was evaluated at the Global Summit and 16 articles were included in our systematic review. Our synthesis included six randomized controlled trials with acceptable or high methodological quality (reported in seven articles). These trials investigated the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT for the management of infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, and migraine. None of the trials evaluated the effectiveness of SMT in preventing the occurrence of non-musculoskeletal disorders. Consensus was reached on the content of all risk of bias and evidence tables. All randomized controlled trials with high or acceptable quality found that SMT was not superior to sham interventions for the treatment of these non-musculoskeletal disorders. Six of 50 participants (12%) in the Global Summit did not approve the final report. CONCLUSION: Our systematic review included six randomized clinical trials (534 participants) of acceptable or high quality investigating the efficacy or effectiveness of SMT for the treatment of non-musculoskeletal disorders. We found no evidence of an effect of SMT for the management of non-musculoskeletal disorders including infantile colic, childhood asthma, hypertension, primary dysmenorrhea, and migraine. This finding challenges the validity of the theory that treating spinal dysfunctions with SMT has a physiological effect on organs and their function. Governments, payers, regulators, educators, and clinicians should consider this evidence when developing policies about the use and reimbursement of SMT for non-musculoskeletal disorders.


Asunto(s)
Asma/terapia , Cólico/terapia , Dismenorrea/terapia , Hipertensión/terapia , Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Enfermedades no Transmisibles/terapia
7.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(5): 335-342, 2019 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31272711

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine clinicians' ability to modulate spinal manipulation (SM) thrust characteristics based on their tactile perception of pressure and volitional intensity. METHODS: In a cross-sectional, within-participants design, 13 doctors of chiropractic delivered SM thrusts of perceived least, appropriate, or greatest intensity of their perceived safe output level for an SM thrust on low-fidelity thoracic spine models of 4 different pressure levels. The participants performed SM over the course of 96 trials in a randomized order on combinations of thrust intensity and pressure. Dependent variables included normalized preload force, thrust force, thrust duration, peak acceleration, time to peak acceleration, and displacement. For all dependent measures, 2-factor within-participants analysis of variance models with repeated measures on both factors were performed. RESULTS: Preload force increased with intensity (F2,24 = 9.72; P < .001) and model pressure (F3,36 = 4.27; P = .011). Participants modulated thrust force and displacement as each also increased with intensity escalation (F2,24 = 22.53, P < .001; F2,18 = 45.20, P < .001). The highest accelerations were observed during the greatest intensity. Increased thrust force was delivered at higher model pressures (F3,36 = 6.43; P < .001). A significant interaction demonstrated that as volitional thrust intensity increased, greater displacement was attained, particularly on low pressure models (F6,54 = 11.06; P < .001). Thrust duration and time to peak acceleration yielded no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Spinal manipulation thrust dosage was modulated by the chiropractors' tactile perception of pressure and volitional intensity.


Asunto(s)
Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Percepción del Tacto , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Estudios Transversales , Retroalimentación , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Presión
8.
Int J Neurosci ; 129(11): 1066-1075, 2019 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31220973

RESUMEN

Aim: The present study describes the training effects of a novel motorized bicycle-like device for individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury. Methods: Participants were five individuals with motor incomplete spinal cord injury (56 ± 7 years). Four of five participants received two 30-min sessions of training: one with, and one without, mechanical stimulation on the plantar surface of the foot; soleus paired H-reflex depression was examined before and after each session. Three of five participants received 24 sessions of 30-min of training (long-training). Following the long-training, balance, walking and spasticity improvements were assessed using validated clinical outcome measures, in addition to the H-reflex assessment. Results: One cycling session with mechanical stimulation yielded 14% and 32% more reflex depression in participants with moderate spasticity (n = 2/4). The same trend was not observed in non-spastic participants (n = 2/4). All participants who participated in the long-training had spasticity and showed reduced spasticity, improved walking speed, endurance and balance. Conclusions: Overall, participants with spasticity showed increased soleus H-reflex suppression after one training session with mechanical stimulation and reduced spasticity scores after long training. We interpret this as evidence that the training influenced both presynaptic and postsynaptic inhibitory mechanisms acting on soleus motoneurons. Therefore, this training has the potential to be a non-invasive complementary therapy to reduce spasticity after incomplete spinal cord injury.


Asunto(s)
Terapia por Ejercicio/instrumentación , Espasticidad Muscular/rehabilitación , Músculo Esquelético , Rehabilitación Neurológica , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Parálisis/rehabilitación , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/rehabilitación , Anciano , Ciclismo , Diseño de Equipo , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Femenino , Reflejo H/fisiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Espasticidad Muscular/etiología , Rehabilitación Neurológica/instrumentación , Rehabilitación Neurológica/métodos , Parálisis/etiología , Estimulación Física , Prueba de Estudio Conceptual , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones
9.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(3): 159-166, 2019.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31029468

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study are to report the responses of emergency department (ED) clinicians regarding the characteristics and management of patients with noncardiac chest pain (NCCP) and to explore clinician experiences with the current standard of care and whether nonpharmacologic or nonsurgical referral options would be considered. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was delivered to 40 ED clinicians from hospitals in Winnipeg, Manitoba from 2012 to 2013. Data were reduced descriptively and thematically summarized to assess the characteristics of patients with NCCP along with the responses of ED clinicians regarding the management of NCCP. RESULTS: The survey response was 27 (67.5% response rate). They reported that patients with NCCP comprised a considerable amount of ED care and are a variable and heterogeneous population. Respondents agreed (63.0%) that onsite and on-call providers for NCCP referral would assist in patient management. Further, ED clinicians (66.7%) would consider referring patients with NCCP to a nonpharmacologic, nonsurgical clinical research study. CONCLUSION: Clinicians in this study wanted better access to on-site referrals and outpatient clinics for patients experiencing NCCP after discharge and would consider nonpharmacologic or nonsurgical referral.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dolor en el Pecho/diagnóstico , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Adulto , Dolor en el Pecho/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos
10.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 42(1): 23-33, 2019 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30955909

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to quantify the impact of a single lumbar spinal manipulation (SM) intervention on the leg movement performance of degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) patients in a small-scale registered randomized clinical trial. METHODS: Participants with LSS (n = 14) were tested at baseline for pain, lumbar range of motion, and behavioral or kinematic motor performance (using an established Fitts' Law foot-pointing task), then underwent covariate adaptive randomization to receive SM or no intervention. Postintervention all dependent measures were repeated. Experimenters were blinded to patient group allocation. University ethics board approval was attained. RESULTS: For the primary outcome movement time, there was no significant difference between groups. As predicted by Fitts' Law, all participants had longer movement times as task difficulty increased. Secondary kinematic outcomes yielded no significant between-group differences. Consistent with Fitts' Law, kinematic measures changed significantly with task difficulty. Pairwise comparisons revealed the kinematic variables were more adversely affected by greater movement amplitudes than target size changes. No exploratory differences in pain or lumbar range of motion were observed. CONCLUSION: Changes in motor performance were not observed in this chronic pain population after a single SM intervention compared with a control group. Given the sample size, the study may have been underpowered to detect meaningful differences. Fitts' Law was observed for the lower extremity-pointing task for an LSS population and may provide an objective measure of motor performance.


Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/fisiología , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiopatología , Manipulación Espinal , Movimiento/fisiología , Estenosis Espinal/fisiopatología , Estenosis Espinal/rehabilitación , Fenómenos Biomecánicos/fisiología , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Método Simple Ciego
11.
Complement Ther Clin Pract ; 35: 301-307, 2019 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31003674

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The presence of spinal pain in young people has been established as a risk factor for spinal pain later in life. Recent clinical practice guidelines recommend spinal manipulation (SM), soft tissue therapy, acupuncture, and other modalities that are common treatments provided by chiropractors, as interventions for spine pain. Less is known specifically on the response to chiropractic management in young people with spinal pain. The purpose of this manuscript was to describe the impact, through pain measures, of a pragmatic course of chiropractic management in young people's spinal pain at a publicly funded healthcare facility for a low-income population. METHODS: The study utilized a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected quality assurance data attained from the Mount Carmel Clinic (MCC) chiropractic program database. Formal permission to conduct the analysis of the database was acquired from the officer of records at the MCC. The University of Manitoba's Health Research Ethics Board approved all procedures. RESULTS: Young people (defined as 10-24 years of age) demonstrated statistically and clinically significant improvement on the numeric rating scale (NRS) in all four spinal regions following chiropractic management. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present study provide evidence that a pragmatic course of chiropractic care, including SM, mobilization, soft tissue therapy, acupuncture, and other modalities within the chiropractic scope of practice are a viable conservative pain management treatment option for young people.


Asunto(s)
Terapias Complementarias/métodos , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Manipulación Quiropráctica/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria , Canadá , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
12.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 41(4): 265-293, 2018 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29606335

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to develop a clinical practice guideline on the management of acute and chronic low back pain (LBP) in adults. The aim was to develop a guideline to provide best practice recommendations on the initial assessment and monitoring of people with low back pain and address the use of spinal manipulation therapy (SMT) compared with other commonly used conservative treatments. METHODS: The topic areas were chosen based on an Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality comparative effectiveness review, specific to spinal manipulation as a nonpharmacological intervention. The panel updated the search strategies in Medline. We assessed admissible systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials for each question using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews and Cochrane Back Review Group criteria. Evidence profiles were used to summarize judgments of the evidence quality and link recommendations to the supporting evidence. Using the Evidence to Decision Framework, the guideline panel determined the certainty of evidence and strength of the recommendations. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi technique. The guideline was peer reviewed by an 8-member multidisciplinary external committee. RESULTS: For patients with acute (0-3 months) back pain, we suggest offering advice (posture, staying active), reassurance, education and self-management strategies in addition to SMT, usual medical care when deemed beneficial, or a combination of SMT and usual medical care to improve pain and disability. For patients with chronic (>3 months) back pain, we suggest offering advice and education, SMT or SMT as part of a multimodal therapy (exercise, myofascial therapy or usual medical care when deemed beneficial). For patients with chronic back-related leg pain, we suggest offering advice and education along with SMT and home exercise (positioning and stabilization exercises). CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal approach including SMT, other commonly used active interventions, self-management advice, and exercise is an effective treatment strategy for acute and chronic back pain, with or without leg pain.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador/normas , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Dolor de la Región Lumbar/terapia , Manipulación Espinal/normas , Adulto , Canadá , Quiropráctica/normas , Terapias Complementarias/normas , Humanos , Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Revisiones Sistemáticas como Asunto , Resultado del Tratamiento
13.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 25: 38, 2017.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29255593

RESUMEN

Background: Research funds are limited and a healthcare profession that supports research activity should establish research priority areas. The study objective was to identify research priority areas for the Canadian chiropractic profession, and for stakeholders in the chiropractic profession to rank these in order of importance. Methods: We conducted a modified Delphi consensus study between August 2015 and May 2017 to determine the views of Canadian chiropractic organisations (e.g. Canadian Chiropractic Association; provincial associations) and stakeholder groups (e.g. chiropractic educational institutions; researchers). Participants completed three online Delphi survey rounds. In Round 1, participants suggested research areas within four broad research themes: 1) Basic science; 2) Clinical; 3) Health services; and 4) Population health. In Round 2, researchers created sub-themes by categorising the areas suggested in Round 1, and participants judged the importance of the research sub-themes. We defined consensus as at least 70% of participants agreeing that a research area was "essential" or "very important". In Round 3, results from Round 2 were presented to the participants to re-evaluate the importance of sub-themes. Finally, participants completed an online pairwise ranking activity to determine the rank order of the list of important research sub-themes. Results: Fifty-seven participants, of 85 people invited, completed Round 1 (response rate 67%). Fifty-six participants completed Round 2, 55 completed Round 3, and 53 completed the ranking activity. After three Delphi rounds and the pairwise ranking activity was completed, the ranked list of research sub-themes considered important were: 1) Integration of chiropractic care into multidisciplinary settings; 2) Costs and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care; 3) Effect of chiropractic care on reducing medical services; 4) Effects of chiropractic care; 5) Safety/side effects of chiropractic care; 6) Chiropractic care for older adults; 7) Neurophysiological mechanisms and effects of spinal manipulative therapy; 8) General mechanisms and effects of spinal manipulative therapy. Conclusions: This project identified research priority areas for the Canadian chiropractic profession. The top three priority areas were all in the area of health services research: 1) Integration of chiropractic care into multidisciplinary settings; 2) Costs and cost-effectiveness of chiropractic care; 3) Effect of chiropractic care on reducing medical services.


Asunto(s)
Quiropráctica , Prioridades en Salud , Manipulación Quiropráctica , Investigación , Canadá , Consenso , Técnica Delphi , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
14.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 61(3): 190-195, 2017 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29430047

RESUMEN

Our research group recently published a Delphi study that identified Canadian chiropractic profession research priority areas. At the same time, the Canadian Chiropractic Research Foundation (CCRF) was developing their own research priority areas. In this commentary, we discuss the results of the Delphi study, compare and contrast these results to the research priorities of the CCRF, and report new data from a survey about where members of the chiropractic profession think that available research funding should be spent. Ongoing dialogue is needed with all Canadian chiropractic stakeholders to turn these research priorities into action.


Notre groupe de recherche a publié les résultats d'une étude Delphi visant à connaître les priorités de recherche dans le domaine canadien de la chiropratique. Parallèlement, la Fondation canadienne pour la recherche pour la recherche en chiropratique (CCRF) a établi ses propres priorités. Dans les présents commentaires, nous examinerons les résultats de l'étude Delphi, nous les comparerons aux priorités de recherche établis par la CCRF et nous présenterons les résultats d'un sondage mené auprès de membres de la profession pour connaître leurs opinions sur la façon dont les fonds de recherche devraient servir. Un dialogue continu s'impose entre tous les intervenants du domaine de la chiropratique au Canada pour que ces priorités de recherche se traduisent en mesures concrètes.

15.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 39(8): 523-564.e27, 2016 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27836071

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The objective was to develop a clinical practice guideline on the management of neck pain-associated disorders (NADs) and whiplash-associated disorders (WADs). This guideline replaces 2 prior chiropractic guidelines on NADs and WADs. METHODS: Pertinent systematic reviews on 6 topic areas (education, multimodal care, exercise, work disability, manual therapy, passive modalities) were assessed using A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) and data extracted from admissible randomized controlled trials. We incorporated risk of bias scores in the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Evidence profiles were used to summarize judgments of the evidence quality, detail relative and absolute effects, and link recommendations to the supporting evidence. The guideline panel considered the balance of desirable and undesirable consequences. Consensus was achieved using a modified Delphi. The guideline was peer reviewed by a 10-member multidisciplinary (medical and chiropractic) external committee. RESULTS: For recent-onset (0-3 months) neck pain, we suggest offering multimodal care; manipulation or mobilization; range-of-motion home exercise, or multimodal manual therapy (for grades I-II NAD); supervised graded strengthening exercise (grade III NAD); and multimodal care (grade III WAD). For persistent (>3 months) neck pain, we suggest offering multimodal care or stress self-management; manipulation with soft tissue therapy; high-dose massage; supervised group exercise; supervised yoga; supervised strengthening exercises or home exercises (grades I-II NAD); multimodal care or practitioner's advice (grades I-III NAD); and supervised exercise with advice or advice alone (grades I-II WAD). For workers with persistent neck and shoulder pain, evidence supports mixed supervised and unsupervised high-intensity strength training or advice alone (grades I-III NAD). CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal approach including manual therapy, self-management advice, and exercise is an effective treatment strategy for both recent-onset and persistent neck pain.


Asunto(s)
Manipulación Quiropráctica , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Lesiones por Latigazo Cervical/terapia , Humanos , Modalidades de Fisioterapia
16.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 59(4): 363-72, 2015 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26816049

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The burden of fees for chiropractic services rendered often falls on the patient and must be provided out-of-pocket regardless of their socioeconomic status and clinical need. Universal healthcare coverage reduces the financial barrier to healthcare utilization, thereby increasing the opportunity for the financially disadvantaged to have access to care. In 2011 the Canadian Province of Manitoba initiated a pilot program providing access to chiropractic care within the Mount Carmel Clinic (MCC), a non-secular, non-profit, inner city community health centre. OBJECTIVE: To describe the initial integration of chiropractic services into a publically funded healthcare facility including patient demographics, referral patterns, treatment practices and clinical outcomes. METHOD: A retrospective database review of chiropractic consultations in 2011 (N=177) was performed. RESULTS: The typical patient referred for chiropractic care was a non-working (86%), 47.3(SD=16.8) year old, who self-identified as Caucasian (52.2%), or Aboriginal (35.8%) and female (68.3%) with a body mass index considered obese at 30.4(SD=7.0). New patient consultations were primarily referrals from other health providers internal to the MCC (71.2%), frequently primary care physicians (76%). Baseline to discharge comparisons of numeric rating scale scores for the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, sacroiliac and extremity regions all exceeded the minimally clinically important difference for reduction in musculoskeletal pain. Improvements occurred over an average of 12.7 (SD=14.3) treatments, and pain reductions were also statistically significant at p<0.05. CONCLUSION: Chiropractic services are being utilized by patients, and referring providers. Clinical outcomes indicate that services rendered decrease musculoskeletal pain in an inner city population.


CONTEXTE: Les frais de chiropratique sont souvent imputés aux patients et doivent être déboursés de la poche de ces derniers, et ce, quels que soient leur situation socioéconomique et leurs besoins cliniques. La couverture maladie universelle réduit les obstacles financiers au recours aux soins de santé, augmentant ainsi les possibilités pour les personnes défavorisées sur le plan financier d'avoir accès aux soins. En 2011, la province canadienne du Manitoba a lancé un programme pilote offrant l'accès à la chiropratique au sein de la Mount Carmel Clinic (MCC), un centre de santé communautaire confessionnel du centre-ville sans but lucratif. OBJECTIF: Décrire l'intégration initiale de la chiropratique dans un établissement de soins de santé financé par l'État en fournissant des données démographiques, des tendances d'acheminement, des pratiques de traitement et des résultats cliniques relatifs aux patients. MÉTHODE: Un examen rétrospectif de la base de données des consultations en chiropratique en 2011 (N = 177) a été réalisé. RÉSULTATS: Le patient type aiguillé vers des soins en chiropratique était une personne de 47,3 ans (écart-type = 16,8) inactive (86 %), qui se considérait comme étant Caucasienne (52,2 %) ou Aborigène (35,8 %), et de sexe féminin (68,3 %) possédant un indice de masse corporelle de 30,4 (écart-type = 7,0) associé à l'obésité. Les consultations de nouveaux patients consistaient principalement en des aiguillages d'autres intervenants en matière de santé du MCC (71,2 %), souvent des médecins de premier recours (76 %). Les données de référence pour élargir les comparaisons des résultats obtenus sur l'échelle d'évaluation numérique pour les régions cervicale, thoracique, lombaire, sacro-iliaque et des extrémités des membres étaient toutes supérieures à la différence minimale cliniquement importante relative à la réduction de la douleur musculo-squelettique. Les améliorations sont apparues après une moyenne de 12,7 traitements (écart-type = 14,3). De plus, les réductions de la douleur étaient également importantes sur le plan statistique au niveau de p < 0,05. CONCLUSION: Les patients et les intervenants en matière de santé aiguillant les patients ont recours à la chiropratique. Les résultats cliniques indiquent que les soins dispensés ont pour effet de réduire la douleur musculo-squelettique chez une population du centre-ville.

17.
Man Ther ; 20(2): 342-8, 2015 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25458144

RESUMEN

This study used an observational design to examine the kinematics of spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) by determining the acceleration characteristics of the manipulative input at the cervical, thoracic, and lumbar spinal regions. Studies of SMT have been restricted to measuring the forces that result from the manipulative input. Several studies have indicated the rate of force development is a key parameter of clinically delivered SMT. Despite this, the movement strategies employed during SMT, including acceleration, have not been directly measured. Participants (n = 29) were recruited from a private practice chiropractic clinic. A wireless accelerometer attached to the clinician's hand was used to characterize the thrust phase of the SMT treatments. Significant differences were found across each spinal region for acceleration amplitude parameters (p < 0.0001). Post-hoc analysis indicated that amplitudes significantly increased in order from thoracic to cervical to lumbar regions (p < 0.0001). Spinal level was also a significant factor in determining the temporal parameters of hand acceleration during SMT (p < 0.0005). This study provides a description of the acceleration properties of clinically delivered SMT. Consistent with that reported for SMT forces, acceleration amplitudes varied significantly across spinal regions with relatively little differences in acceleration latencies. Notably, acceleration amplitudes and latencies were not associated with each other within spinal regions. These findings indicate that changes in acceleration amplitude, rather than latency, are used to tailor SMT to individuals.


Asunto(s)
Aceleración , Dolor de Espalda/terapia , Manipulación Espinal/métodos , Dolor de Cuello/terapia , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Adulto , Dolor de Espalda/diagnóstico , Fenómenos Biomecánicos , Vértebras Cervicales/fisiopatología , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Mano/fisiología , Humanos , Vértebras Lumbares/fisiopatología , Masculino , Dolor de Cuello/diagnóstico , Dimensión del Dolor , Relaciones Profesional-Paciente , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Vértebras Torácicas/fisiología , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
J Manipulative Physiol Ther ; 37(8): 602-9, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25213019

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective of this study was to quantify the lower extremity movements and capabilities of a population with lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) compared with healthy age-matched controls under conditions of strain and no strain. The secondary objective was to identify challenging movement conditions for a population with LSS, on a lower limb aiming task with different levels of difficulty, compared with healthy age-matched controls under conditions of strain and no strain. METHODS: Using a nonrandomized, controlled, before-and-after design, LSS patients (n = 16) and healthy controls (n = 16) performed 2 blocks of great toe-pointing movements to a series of projected squares. Following block 1, participants completed a 12-minute progressive exercise treadmill test. Pointing movements were analyzed using 3D motion analysis. Behavioral and kinematic measures evaluated performance. RESULTS: Both groups' reaction times (RTs) lengthened as task difficulty increased. An interaction revealed that LSS patients were more adversely impacted by task difficulty, F (3,372) = 4.207; P = .006. The progressive exercise treadmill test facilitated RT for both groups, F (1,124) = 5.105; P = .026. Control participants showed less variability in time-to-peak velocity poststrain, a benefit not shared by LSS patients, t (31) = 2.149; P = .040. CONCLUSION: A lower extremity movement task captured differences under strain between healthy and LSS populations. The lower extremity Fitts' Law task accurately measured differences between healthy and LSS participants. For the subjects in this study, strain was sufficient to prevent LSS patients from demonstrating improvement in the variability of the ballistic phase of movement execution, whereas LSS patients' movement performance remained unchanged. This study also showed that regardless of strain, as task difficulty increased, LSS patients were more adversely impacted in the planning and execution of their lower limb movements than healthy control participants. The lower extremity motor control task (Fitts' task) can be used as a performance-based outcome measure to measure differences between healthy and LSS populations.


Asunto(s)
Extremidad Inferior/fisiopatología , Vértebras Lumbares , Estenosis Espinal/fisiopatología , Caminata , Adulto , Anciano , Prueba de Esfuerzo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud
20.
J Can Chiropr Assoc ; 58(2): 170-83, 2014 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24932021

RESUMEN

Somatosensory evoked potentionals (SEPs) can be used to elucidate differences in cortical activity associated with a spinal manipulation (SM) intervention. The purpose of this narrative review is to overview the origin and application of SEPs, a neurophysiological technique to investigate neuroplasticity. Summaries of: 1) parameters for SEP generation and waveform recording; 2) SEP peak nomenclature, interpretation and generators; 3) peaks pertaining to tactile information processing (relevant to both chiropractic and other manual therapies); 4) utilization and application of SEPs; 5) SEPs concurrent with an experimental task and at baseline/control/pretest; 6) SEPs pain studies; and 7) SEPs design (pre/post) and neural reorganization/neuroplasticity; and 8) SEPs and future chiropractic research are all reviewed. Understanding what SEPs are, and their application allows chiropractors, educators, and other manual therapists interested in SM to understand the context, and importance of research findings from SM studies that involve SEPs.


Les potentiels évoqués somesthésiques (PES) peuvent servir à élucider les différences dans l'activité corticale liée à une manipulation vertébrale (MV). La présente revue narrative a pour objet de donner un aperçu de l'origine et de l'application des PES, une technique neurophysiologique servant à étudier la neuroplasticité. Les sujets suivants feront l'objet de résumés : 1) paramètres pour la génération de PES et l'enregistrement des formes d'ondes; 2) nomenclature, interprétation et générateurs du point maximum de PES; 3) points maximums relatifs au traitement de l'information tactile (pertinent pour la chiropratique et les autres thérapies manuelles); 4) l'utilisation et l'application des PES; 5) PES en même temps qu'une tâche expérimentale et au point de référence/prétest; 6) les PES et les études sur la douleur; 7) conception des PES (pré/post) et réorganisation neuronale/neuroplasticité; 8) les PES et la recherche future en chiropratique. Comprendre ce que sont les PES ainsi que leur application permet aux chiropraticiens, aux éducateurs et aux autres thérapeutes manuels qui s'intéressent à la MV de comprendre le contexte et l'importance des conclusions des recherches sur la MV où l'on a recours aux PES.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA