Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Más filtros

Métodos Terapéuticos y Terapias MTCI
Tipo del documento
País de afiliación
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Rev. iberoam. micol ; 32(1): 34-39, ene.-mar. 2015. ilus
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-132894

RESUMEN

Background. Candida guilliermondii has been recognized as an emerging pathogen showing a decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and considerably high echinocandin MICs. Aims. Evaluate the in vitro activity of anidulafungin in comparison to amphotericin B and fluconazole against different isolates of C. guilliermondii, and their efficacy in an immunosuppressed murine model of disseminated infection. Methods. The in vitro susceptibility of four strains against amphotericin B, fluconazole and anidulafungin was performed by using a reference broth microdilution method and time-kill curves. The in vivo efficacy was evaluated by determination of fungal load reduction in kidneys of infected animals receiving deoxycholate AMB at 0,8 mg/kg i.v., liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg i.v., fluconazole at 50 mg/kg, or anidulafungin at 10 mg/kg. Results. Amphotericin B and anidulafungin showed fungicidal activity, while fluconazole was fungistatic for all the strains. In the murine model, liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg/day was effective in reducing the tissue burden in kidneys of mice infected with any of the tested strains. However, amphotericin B, anidulafungin and fluconazole were only effective against those strains showing low MIC values. Conclusions. Liposomal amphotericin B showed the higher activity and efficacy against the two strains of C. guilliermondii, in contrast to the poor effect of fluconazole and anidulafungin. Further studies with more isolates of C. guilliermondii representing a wider range of MICs should be carried out to assess whether there is any relationship between MIC values and anidulafungin efficacy (AU)


Antecedentes. Candida guilliermondii es un patógeno emergente, con reducida sensibilidad al fluconazol y a las equinocandinas. Objetivos. Evaluar la actividad in vitro de la anidulafungina, en comparación con la de la anfotericina B y el fluconazol, frente a C. guilliermondii y su eficacia en un modelo animal de infección diseminada. Métodos. La sensibilidad in vitro se valoró mediante microdilución en caldo y curvas de mortalidad. La eficacia in vivo se evaluó mediante la determinación de la carga fúngica en riñón de ratones inmunosuprimidos con infección diseminada por C. guilliermondii tratados con anfotericina B desoxicolato (0.8 mg/kg i.v.), anfotericina B liposomal (10 mg/kg i.v.), fluconazol (50 mg/kg) o anidulafungina (10 mg/kg). Resultados. La anfotericina B y la anidulafungina mostraron actividad fungicida, mientras que el fluconazol fue fungistático frente a todas las cepas. En el modelo murino, la anfotericina B liposomal redujo para todas las cepas la carga fúngica en riñones, mientras que la anfotericina B desoxicolato, la anidulafungina y el fluconazol fueron efectivas solo en aquellos animales infectados con las cepas de menor valor de concentración mínima inhibitoria (CMI). Conclusiones. La anfotericina B liposomal mostró la mayor actividad y eficacia frente a C. guilliermondii, en contraste con el limitado efecto del fluconazol y de la anidulafungina. Se necesitan estudios que incluyan cepas con un rango más amplio de CMI que permitan determinar la relación entre la actividad in vitro y la eficacia de la anidulafungina (AU)


Asunto(s)
Animales , Masculino , Femenino , Ratones , Candida , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candida/metabolismo , Antifúngicos/metabolismo , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Modelos Animales , Ácido Desoxicólico/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Evaluación de Eficacia-Efectividad de Intervenciones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana/métodos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Fluconazol/metabolismo , Fluconazol/farmacocinética , Fluconazol/uso terapéutico , Anfotericina B/uso terapéutico
2.
Rev Iberoam Micol ; 32(1): 34-9, 2015.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24594291

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Candida guilliermondii has been recognized as an emerging pathogen showing a decreased susceptibility to fluconazole and considerably high echinocandin MICs. AIMS: Evaluate the in vitro activity of anidulafungin in comparison to amphotericin B and fluconazole against different isolates of C. guilliermondii, and their efficacy in an immunosuppressed murine model of disseminated infection. METHODS: The in vitro susceptibility of four strains against amphotericin B, fluconazole and anidulafungin was performed by using a reference broth microdilution method and time-kill curves. The in vivo efficacy was evaluated by determination of fungal load reduction in kidneys of infected animals receiving deoxycholate AMB at 0,8 mg/kg i.v., liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg i.v., fluconazole at 50 mg/kg, or anidulafungin at 10 mg/kg. RESULTS: Amphotericin B and anidulafungin showed fungicidal activity, while fluconazole was fungistatic for all the strains. In the murine model, liposomal amphotericin B at 10 mg/kg/day was effective in reducing the tissue burden in kidneys of mice infected with any of the tested strains. However, amphotericin B, anidulafungin and fluconazole were only effective against those strains showing low MIC values. CONCLUSIONS: Liposomal amphotericin B showed the higher activity and efficacy against the two strains of C. guilliermondii, in contrast to the poor effect of fluconazole and anidulafungin. Further studies with more isolates of C. guilliermondii representing a wider range of MICs should be carried out to assess whether there is any relationship between MIC values and anidulafungin efficacy.


Asunto(s)
Anfotericina B/farmacología , Antifúngicos/farmacología , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Candidiasis Invasiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Equinocandinas/farmacología , Fluconazol/farmacología , Anidulafungina , Animales , Antifúngicos/uso terapéutico , Candida/aislamiento & purificación , Candidiasis Invasiva/etiología , Candidiasis Invasiva/microbiología , Enfermedades Transmisibles Emergentes/microbiología , Evaluación Preclínica de Medicamentos , Riñón/microbiología , Masculino , Ratones , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Neutropenia/complicaciones , Distribución Aleatoria , Especificidad de la Especie
3.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother ; 58(10): 6255-7, 2014 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25049245

RESUMEN

We evaluated the in vitro killing activity of voriconazole (VRC) and posaconazole (PSC) against two clinical isolates of Candida guilliermondii. The two drugs showed fungistatic activity against both isolates and were effective in reducing kidney fungal burden in a neutropenic murine model of disseminated candidiasis in infected mice. PSC was significantly more effective than VRC against one of the strains. The serum levels of PSC and VRC were above the corresponding MICs for these isolates.


Asunto(s)
Antifúngicos/farmacología , Azoles/farmacología , Candida/efectos de los fármacos , Pruebas de Sensibilidad Microbiana , Triazoles/farmacología , Voriconazol/farmacología
4.
Int J Antimicrob Agents ; 29(1): 79-83, 2007 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17134881
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA